I-Link , what’s your thoughts?

  • Jesse Krook
    Y.M.H.
    Posts: 6403
    #1295419

    Having a discussion in another thread has brought me to wonder how many of you have the I-Link ? If so give me your honest feedback to the pro’s AND con’s of the I-Link.

    I was told it is must have however for the way I fish I don’t see it to be beneficial (I am only guessing this). I like to work breaks and structure at multiple depths not just one so I see no need for it in my boat. Now, if I go fishing with somebody someday that has the I-Link and at the end of the day I get out of their boat saying to myself “geez, I don’t know how I have fished the last 30 years without one of those I-Link systems” , I will probably buy it. Until then I can probably still catch fish without it….. I hope

    #1140300

    Quote:


    I like to work breaks and structure at multiple depths not just one so I see no need for it in my boat


    Exact same reason I will be passing on the I-Link as well Jesse.

    Don’t get me wrong it is a very cool feature, but it’s something I don’t see myself benefiting from that much, especially since I’m running a tiller and spend a greater deal of time back trolling vs using my bow mount trolling motor.

    Eric Rehberg
    Eau Claire, WI
    Posts: 3071
    #1140306

    Well I just spent 3 days last week playing with one, and its great!! I dont believe your going to get much feedback from others as there is VERY few out there right now. A few things that I noticed those 3 days, It is all that it has been talked up to be. The contour following is great for those big flats or long shorelines. The waypoint and spotlock management right from the locator is quite nice also.
    For some people it will be a needed tool, for others it will just be an extra gadget. It really depends on the person and location/style of fishing.

    Joel Ballweg
    Sauk City, Wisconsin
    Posts: 3295
    #1140308

    I fully agree with what both of you are saying on working multiple depths along a breakline.
    However, there are times when I’ve found walleyes sticking to a very specific depth along a break.

    I do find it hard to believe that the I-link can control the boat well enough to avoid overlapping other depths to some degree. To what degree? I really don’t know but would like to find out.

    One thing I’m not sure about on the I-link:
    Is it working solely from information on the gps map or is it also taking into account info from sonar?

    If it’s working solely off map info, I really doubt that it can follow the breakline on a specific depth without some overlap of other depths.

    Good post though as I am also looking to learn more about how well the I-link actually does work.

    mike-west
    Amery, WI
    Posts: 1422
    #1140309

    Agree Jesse, after doign some research, I see no reason for it either. Not that a new gadget in boat isn’t always nice, but I see it doing little to imporve the way’s and methods I fish.
    Just my$.02

    Jesse Krook
    Y.M.H.
    Posts: 6403
    #1140311

    Eric,

    Are you guys running that in your boat this year ? If so then hopefully I’ll get a chance to fish with you or Dean sometime and check it out.

    igotone
    Posts: 1746
    #1140312

    I-link

    NO way No need

    kroger3
    blaine mn
    Posts: 1116
    #1140315

    Have not run it personally yet but do like the fact of the waypoint, spotlock management, and your recorded trails right on the Humminbird screen rather then in an imaginary place in a remote control…

    Im excited to use it for pitching jigs when you can mark half dozen way points and just tell it to go stop lock “over there” and no matter how may way points you have you can always come back and spot lock on them rather then hovering over a waypoint then hitting the spot lock on the remote.

    Follow contour will be handy at times but I am intrested in the other Humminbird intregrated features.

    Eric Rehberg
    Eau Claire, WI
    Posts: 3071
    #1140356

    Yes we will have one on our boat this year. As soon as we get them it will get put on. Im hoping to have it on by FYB but no promises there.

    Quote:


    Eric,

    Are you guys running that in your boat this year ? If so then hopefully I’ll get a chance to fish with you or Dean sometime and check it out.


    Eric Rehberg
    Eau Claire, WI
    Posts: 3071
    #1111148

    It works solely off the gps and lakemaster chip. There is no info gathered from the sonar. On a real steep breakline or really curvy line it will vary depth some, but from what I experienced it wasnt a whole lot.

    Quote:


    I fully agree with what both of you are saying on working multiple depths along a breakline.
    However, there are times when I’ve found walleyes sticking to a very specific depth along a break.

    I do find it hard to believe that the I-link can control the boat well enough to avoid overlapping other depths to some degree. To what degree? I really don’t know but would like to find out.

    One thing I’m not sure about on the I-link:
    Is it working solely from information on the gps map or is it also taking into account info from sonar?

    If it’s working solely off map info, I really doubt that it can follow the breakline on a specific depth without some overlap of other depths.

    Good post though as I am also looking to learn more about how well the I-link actually does work.


    Joel Ballweg
    Sauk City, Wisconsin
    Posts: 3295
    #1140416

    Thanks for the input pertaining to actual on water experience Eric.

    I’ll certainly be interested in hearing more about these features as people get a chance to use it more & more.
    All this info is very helpful for those of us who haven’t quite settled on which brand (hummingbird or lowrance) we may want to buy next when the time to upgrade comes around.

    hope4fish
    Posts: 30
    #1140506

    I haven’t had an opportunity to try one yet, so take my comments with a grain of salt……

    When I bought an I-Pilot last year, I was really excited for the I-Link to come out to tie the trolling motor together with the locator, but to be honest, I’m a bit disappointed in the features offered. I do think having the tracks, and spot locks on the locator and being able to control from there would be very nice, but the tolling by following a contour on the map chip doesn’t get me too excited. The map chips just aren’t anywhere near accurate enough for most lakes I fish for this to be useful. I do alot of trolling and typically fish shoreline breaks. In areas where the break is fairly steep, the depth can easily very by up to 10 feet from what the map says which would have my cranks digging bottom often times. When I manually try to troll along a depth contour by using the current “shading” available, I’m quite a bit out of my depth target much more than I’m in it. I suppose this is likely because I fish many lakes that aren’t as popular as the big tournament lakes, so the contour maps aren’t as accurate.

    What did I hope the I-link would do? I had hoped I could sit down on a computer with a lake map up and plot out trolling passes which I could later re-create on the water. This would allow me to take my knowledge of the lake into account (fix known inaccuracies in the map) and plan my trolling pass accordingly. Even better yet would be the ability to fix known problems with the contour lines. Right now what I often do when the contour lines are way off is I zig zag back and forth accross my targeted depth contour, and place a waypoint right on the right depth. If you put enough of these in a row along the shoreline break, you can follow it with the I-Pilot and record a track. Doing this manually is cool, but is a chore. Having the ability to save that and not having to re-create would be really cool!

    I just bought a new boat, but am passing on I-Link at this time.

    Denny O
    Central IOWA
    Posts: 5827
    #1140750

    Ok, I think I may have spured this thread.
    I’ll try to add my real comments latter.

    But for now, it was like my dad said when I bought my first new “1977” truck. I debated about “Power locks and Windows” for under $300.00 dollars.

    Dad said, “you might find how nice they are. Besides, you are buying a whole new truck, what is it going you cost you, less than one more payment?”

    So Jesse,
    I’ll let it go for that, for now.

    Fife
    Ramsey, MN
    Posts: 4056
    #1140838

    I am also looking into purchasing the I-Link, so I have been reading the other replies and look forward to hearing more.

    Here are my reasons for wanting to upgrade and from what I have read it should work well for those situations. Rigging or pulling spinners along the edge of a piece of structure. Often times on Mille Lacs mudflats, Walleyes will relate to the edges so I can pick a waypoint halfway down the edge and work along the break. I see it as an advantage that the maps are not spot on so I can work different depths along that edge, but still stay close to it. Many of the lakes I fish are mapped well, so this will work great for contour trolling. If I’m casting a shoreline, I can see the benefits of using the offset feature to stay 50 feet off of an edge and then cast towards it. If I have a good trolling run, I can tell it to turn around and follow the same trail. With the current system I would have to manually plot out a course and save it. It is easy enough to navigate to a waypoint and turn on spot lock manually, but maybe in the future I will see the value in being able to go to the spot on the GPS automatically.

    I’m hoping it can accomplish those things.

    Ben Garver
    Hickman, Nebraska
    Posts: 3149
    #1141220

    Great comments guys.

    I have a little concern on the depth contour tracking. I believe you can set it to follow waypoints in a similar way. If some contours were off I think you could plot waypoints to correct any depth differance. Am I understanding this correctly? If this is right, there’s no doubt I need one.

    Eric Rehberg
    Eau Claire, WI
    Posts: 3071
    #1141896

    Quote:


    Great comments guys.

    I have a little concern on the depth contour tracking. I believe you can set it to follow waypoints in a similar way. If some contours were off I think you could plot waypoints to correct any depth differance. Am I understanding this correctly? If this is right, there’s no doubt I need one.


    You are correct Ben. You have 2 choices there, you can follow the contour on the map chip or you can also plot out as many gps points as you want and it will connect the dots and go waypoint to waypoint!!

    average-joe
    Hudson, WI
    Posts: 2376
    #1142832

    As a muskie guy I do a ton of casting, so I think this is going to be a great tool for making boat control a breese

    I can’t wait to get one

    Jesse Krook
    Y.M.H.
    Posts: 6403
    #1145283

    Quote:


    Quote:


    Great comments guys.

    I have a little concern on the depth contour tracking. I believe you can set it to follow waypoints in a similar way. If some contours were off I think you could plot waypoints to correct any depth differance. Am I understanding this correctly? If this is right, there’s no doubt I need one.


    You are correct Ben. You have 2 choices there, you can follow the contour on the map chip or you can also plot out as many gps points as you want and it will connect the dots and go waypoint to waypoint!!


    WELL !!!! I didn’t know that !?!?!?! Oh well I can always buy one later. I’d still like to see it in action first hand rather than reading comments about it

Viewing 18 posts - 1 through 18 (of 18 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.