gun control bill

putting this here because this forum is more heavily viewed. i was just alerted to this!!!!

there is a really bad gun control bill going thru st paul right now labeled NUCLEAR GUN CONTROL BILL IN MINNESOTA!! its been introduced by Sen John Marty and its really horrible if you are a gun owner.

the Mn gun owners caucus has it on there site with the details. i believe there is a petition to sign if your against it……. someone with more puter smarts should get that up so every outdoorsman and woman can sign it.

Petition

big_g wrote:

Petition

thanks big G!!!! signed!!!!!!

Signed also. Thanks for bringing this up here guy’s

Signed. Thanks for the head up.

Its SF 1723, introduced a month ago. Has not made it anywhere yet, and has a ton of removed language in it. Kind of long and confusing to be honest. Will need a lot of revisions and clarification before it gains any momentum.

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/text.php?number=SF1723&version=latest&session=ls93&session_year=2023&session_number=0

Knew something like this was coming since our state is under complete Dem control now. They plan to sneak in their egregious new laws rather than make a big fuss. Wearing plaid and fishing a couple hours on opener doesnt fool me.

Thanks to all that voted THESE PEOPLE in……..

i’m just a peon in the grand scheme of things here on IDO but i’d rather not this go political…..this is to important to me to get it zapped…….sign it and let’er buck!!!!

glenn57 wrote:

i’m just a peon in the grand scheme of things here on IDO but i’d rather not this go political…..this is to important to me to get it zapped…….sign it and let’er buck!!!!

HA! Thats funny. it’s 100% political

DTW

Signed.

Instead of making noise here, those who feel like sounding off should be writing to those legislators who support this stuff and let them know that you’ll be supporting every effort that comes along in removing them from the legislature come next voting time. Dumping your ideologies here does nothing.

Signed, Thanks Glenn

DTW wrote:

<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>glenn57 wrote:</div>
i’m just a peon in the grand scheme of things here on IDO but i’d rather not this go political…..this is to important to me to get it zapped…….sign it and let’er buck!!!!

HA! Thats funny. it’s 100% political

DTW

Yes asking for signatures to stop a proposed bill is basically the definition of political. Taking a guess here but I think Glenn just means he’s not looking to start a discussion on this post. Just wants to make everyone aware and then move on.

Honestly should just have a link to the bill and a link to the petition, then lock and sticky the thread.

Dumb question but can people from the great state of Wisconsin sign this? Also what are they trying to ban?

KP wrote:

Also what are they trying to ban?

I posted the legislative proposed bill above. Its quite long, with a lot of revision, addition, and other information in it.

gim wrote:

<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>KP wrote:</div>
Also what are they trying to ban?

I posted the legislative proposed bill above. Its quite long, with a lot of revision, addition, and other information in it.

The lazy in me was looking for the spark note version haha

KP wrote:

The lazy in me was looking for the spark note version haha

Haha ya its a long (and confusing) read. I went through it earlier and just gave up halfway through.

KP wrote:

The lazy in me was looking for the spark note version haha

This is the first paragraph of the bill will give you an idea: “modifying concealed carry of firearms; banning possession
of large capacity ammunition magazines, ghost guns, and other weapons;
prohibiting open carry of firearms”

A couple more laws they don’t enforce on criminals, and the bad guys should start complying. The logic.

CaptainMusky wrote:

This is the first paragraph of the bill will give you an idea: “modifying concealed carry of firearms; banning possession
of large capacity ammunition magazines, ghost guns, and other weapons;
prohibiting open carry of firearms”

If you continue on, there are exceptions to all of those and a fair amount of language has been removed. So simply stating that all of that in broad form is in the bill is not accurate, at least right now. Obviously can and likely will get revised again, if it makes it that far.

tswobda is 100% correct.i know its from st paul and political…… but the heart of the matter here is do you want this to be law

to Jimmy Jones point my state reps arent in favor from the info i can gather!!!!!

KP wrote:

The lazy in me was looking for the spark note version haha

Magazine restrictions, Red Flag Laws, and Universal Background checks aka gun registration would be the cliff notes version.

gim wrote:

If you continue on, there are exceptions to all of those and a fair amount of language has been removed. So simply stating that all of that in broad form is in the bill is not accurate, at least right now. Obviously can and likely will get revised again, if it makes it that far.

Yeah, but I am not reading all that. Just like politicians dont read the 1000 page bills they vote on. Its a farce.

CaptainMusky wrote:

ust like politicians dont read the 1000 page bills they vote on.

Lol that’s probably pretty accurate

Should I buy a gun now? I’m 40 yo and don’t own any gun but maybe now is the time?

canoebasser wrote:

Should I buy a gun now? I’m 40 yo and don’t own any gun but maybe now is the time?

Only buy one, if you will be responsible with it. Take some gun safety training and learn how to handle it first. You only need one, when you need one.

Thanks Glen for posting this I hope it doesn’t get pulled. I had posted the same about 2 weeks ago and wasn’t up for less than 30 minutes and got dusted. Good info here.

big_g wrote:

Only buy one, if you will be responsible with it. Take some gun safety training and learn how to handle it first. You only need one, when you need one.

Speaking of gun safety, remember when they actually did it through schools?

Signed

I wish I could sign, but being from Wisconsin I don’t think it would have any bearing on MN law.

Copied from @MinnesotaMiners twitter.

“There are 87 sheriffs in the state of Minnesota. Out of that 87 there are 76 that directly oppose the gun legislation currently sitting in this year’s legislative session”.