Governor Dayton Wants to Crack-Down on Illegal Poaching

  • Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #1527832

    ST. PAUL, MN – As a life-long hunter and angler, Governor Mark Dayton has proposed significant reforms to Minnesota’s poaching laws this session. Governor Dayton is pushing hard to enact more stringent penalties for those who intentionally violate the state’s hunting and fishing laws. The Governor’s push for tougher poaching penalties comes in the wake of numerous high-profile instances of illegal poaching activity in Minnesota. By enacting more severe consequences for these crimes, Governor Dayton and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) hope to deter illegal poaching, and ensure these criminal acts are properly and thoroughly punished.

    “The recently reported instances of wanton and wasteful poaching in Minnesota should offend the sensibilities of all ethical and law-abiding hunters and anglers,” said Governor Dayton. “They are shameful criminal acts, and they should be treated as serious offenses by Minnesota laws. I ask our state’s sportsmen and sportswomen to join me in urging the legislature to increase the penalties for these disgusting abuses.”

    Governor Dayton’s poaching reform proposal would enact stiffer criminal penalties and longer license revocations for anyone who unlawfully take and possess significant numbers of wild animals. The Governor’s proposal would establish a new felony-level penalty for poaching, and revoke game and fish licenses and privileges for a period of up to ten years. Current law only includes up to a gross misdemeanor penalty for poaching and license revocations of up to only five years.

    “Gross over-limit violations are not accidental,” said DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr. “The reforms being championed by Governor Dayton this year reflect the values of responsible Minnesota hunters and anglers. This proposal would enact strong and appropriate penalties for those who intentionally disregard the ethical and legal boundaries of hunting and fishing in Minnesota.”

    Minnesota’s game and fish laws are intended to balance and maintain healthy populations of wild animals, recreational hunting and fishing opportunities, and sustainable commercial uses – now and for future generations. Under the Governor’s proposal, the felony penalty for poaching would apply to individuals who unlawfully take animals above a restitution value of $2,000. Gross over-limit penalty thresholds are based on the wildlife restitution values set in law, which include:

    Four or more deer
    Two or more trophy deer
    Five or more bears or turkeys
    Forty or more ducks, geese, pheasant, grouse, or salmon
    Sixty-seven or more walleye or Northern pike

    Recent Instances of Criminal Poaching in Minnesota

    Several egregious instances of illegal poaching have surfaced in the last several months, highlighting the need to enact stricter penalties to deter this criminal activity and safeguard wild game in Minnesota.

    Two Rare Bull Elk in Northwestern Minnesota – Just this week, two bull elk were illegally shot and killed near Grygla. The elk were killed by poachers an area that holds Minnesota’s smallest elk herd – an area has been closed to hunting since 2012. According to the DNR, these bulls represented about 10 percent of the known Grygla elk herd. The Grygla herd has declined in recent years, and is currently estimated at 18 elk – down from 20 counted last year, and 28 counted in 2013. Anyone with information about the illegal shooting of the two bulls, or the suspicious death of a bull elk in the Grygla area in fall of 2013, is urged to call the 24-hour, toll-free Turn In Poachers (TIP) hotline.
    28 Sets of Antlers Seized in Deer Poaching Case – In January of this year, the DNR seized 28 sets of antlers in a deer poaching investigation in Dawson, Minnesota. The antlers included 11 shoulder mounts, most of which were trophy class animals. Also seized were four sets of elk antlers and a set of mule deer antlers. In a freezer, officers also discovered a fully intact piebald deer, which was untagged and had been killed with a high-powered rifle. DNR officers also seized a freshly-killed eight-point whitetail buck, which investigators determined had been killed with a high-powered rifle. Suspects in the poaching case were charged with gross misdemeanors for transporting illegally taken big game, use of an artificial light to take deer, hunting during prohibited times, trespassing, and failure to register deer. Complaints from the public through the Turn In Poachers (TIP) hotline helped DNR officers uncover the scheme and press charges.

    Turn In Poachers

    Minnesota’s “Turn In Poachers” (TIP) program was formed in 1981 by concerned citizens who wanted to stop the illegal harvest of game and fish in Minnesota. TIP operates a 24-hour, toll-free hotline (800-652-9093) that Minnesotans can call to lodge complaints against suspected poachers. Cell phone users can also dial #TIP to file a complaint. The information and the person reporting poaching activity can be kept confidential. Those reporting violations are asked to obtain as much information as possible, and to report all violations as soon as possible. If an arrest is initiated, the person reporting the violation may be eligible for a reward of up to $1,000, depending upon the seriousness of the crime.

    suzuki
    Woodbury, Mn
    Posts: 18621
    #1527835

    As long as it doesn’t affect weekend poachers like my wife and I, no problem.
    It really is a healthier way to eat eggs!!

    Al Willits
    Posts: 11
    #1527843

    “”As a life-long hunter and angler, Governor Mark Dayton””

    I find that a bit humorous.

    Do agree in stiffer fines and such for gross over limits, but I think 67 walleys/northerns is a bit more than gross.

    Al

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #1527848

    I’m not sure a felony is the way to go. But I’m all for stiffer fines.

    BigWerm
    SW Metro
    Posts: 11636
    #1527860

    Would wanton waste fall under this as well? Like from say, a net?

    glenn57
    cold spring mn
    Posts: 11814
    #1527867

    Would wanton waste fall under this as well? Like from say, a net?

    whistling whistling whistling devil devil waytogo waytogo waytogo waytogo waytogo waytogo waytogo

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #1527905

    Would wanton waste fall under this as well? Like from say, a net?

    Absolutely, as long as you aren’t the member of a “sovereign nation”.

    Hunting4Walleyes
    MN
    Posts: 1552
    #1527911

    I’m all for the penalty that fits the crime. Correct me if I’m wrong but any theft over $1000 is prosecuted as a felony. Why should fish and game laws be any different? If the restitution cost for the fish/game you poached reaches $1000 you should be charged with a felony. After all they are stealing from everyone in the state when they choose to poach.
    I know some people might be worried by a guy keeping a few too many fish being charged with a felony. I doubt a few extra fish are going to reach $1000 in restitution so that will never affect the occasional opps… I had a couple extra. It’s going to affect the guys that absolutely thumbed their nose at the law and choose to be game hogs. There should be no kid gloves on when dealing with these hogs.

    outdoors4life
    Stillwater, MN
    Posts: 1500
    #1527939

    My first thought was….”Is there legal poaching?”

    CO’s have a tough job and it passing bills don’t change that.

    nhamm
    Inactive
    Robbinsdale
    Posts: 7348
    #1527959

    This is exactly why I would hate to be a politician. We ask for stiffer penalties then when they come out with it there’s very lil support. Just jokes and marginal its ok.

    Throw the law books at these criminals. In fact first, take the law books and crack em over the head with it and then slap a felony on their butts. These people know exactly what they’re doing and need a potential punch to the throat if they get caught, not a slap on the wrist they get now.

    Makes ya wonder if a Rep. Governor stepped up the different reaction we would be getting on here. coffee

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #1527973

    No different reaction from me.

    I just feel a snot nose kid having a gross over limit shouldn’t pay for that mistake for the rest of his life.

    No voting
    No guns
    No jobs that require background checks
    Jury exclusion

    This isn’t a violent crime towards another human.
    On the other hand, some of the fine I’ve seen are ridiculously low.

    I’m a fence sitter on this one at this point but I haven’t thought about it too much yet either.

    nhamm
    Inactive
    Robbinsdale
    Posts: 7348
    #1527980

    I just feel a snot nose kid having a gross over limit shouldn’t pay for that mistake for the rest of his life.

    The kid card?

    When I bought my first fishing license as a snot nose kid they also handed me a regulation book.

    I consider these serious burglaries to all of us sportsmen. And a year in the can punishment might seriously deter some of the knuckleheads now doing it.

    If we as sportsmen don’t stand for the change, then who will?

    TheFamousGrouse
    St. Paul, MN
    Posts: 11640
    #1527981

    Setting aside the question of how do I get signed up for legal poaching vs the illegal kind…

    I’m glad to see the proposal and I’m shocked that this has taken this long.

    Fines and criminal sanctions for poaching are laughably minor, especially given the fact that the reason there is so much poaching going on in the first place is because poachers know there is little chance of getting caught.

    Upping the fines and criminal charges may not do much to deter the hard core poacher who is doing it for money, but there’s a whole other category of poacher who is just as bad. This is the Freezer Filler Poacher who goes out every day and limits out on crappies and/or walleye and adds them to the 500 fillets he’s already got in the freezer.

    This kind of poacher is a game hog who sees himself as “not doing anything wrong” even though he’s stealing from everyone else. Because this kind of poacher is often a lakeshore cabin owner or a local resident who can fly under the radar of law enforcement, he’s seldom caught in any conventional spot check.

    Up the fines and bust them all and bust them hard. Don’t want to do the time? Don’t do the crime.

    Grouse

    Mike W
    MN/Anoka/Ham lake
    Posts: 13294
    #1528175

    I like the ideas but with who this is coming from do not trust it at all. “life long hunter and angler”? Seems to me this starts out with some fuzzy truth right there. Now if it started out with “Im putting my name on this to get hunter and fisherman votes” might of believed this. Have a funny feeling this is just another way for the state to raise more money through fines and possibly restrict access to the outdoors for those of us that are true hunters and anglers.

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.