New 48 inch minimum for Muskies.

  • guideman
    Lake Vermilion, Tower, Minnesota
    Posts: 171
    #1292830

    Along with a number of other lakes Vermilion will have a new minimum size limt for Muskies this season.
    Having been a long time supporter of longer size limits, I’m very happy about the new regs. What’s your own thoughts on this good, bad or is it a waste of time.

    “Ace”

    marty28
    Mendota Heights, MN
    Posts: 280
    #522121

    I think this is a great idea. Although I would like to see it state-wide. Just makes the opportunity to catch trophy class muskies more favorable.

    robstenger
    Northern Twin Cities, MN
    Posts: 11374
    #522123

    On Vermillion, Mille Lacs, & Leech. I’m all for it. Glad to hear it go through on the Big V.

    jeremy-liebig
    mpls
    Posts: 1455
    #522142

    Great news! Glad to see it went through on those lakes for this year, probably more to come in the next few years or so. Gotta start somewhere.

    vikefanmn77
    Northfield,MN
    Posts: 1493
    #522205

    I dont know that this really makes a difference or not. Aside from a russian buddy of mine, Ive never heard of anyone keeping a ski…

    timmy
    Posts: 1960
    #522931

    I’m very much against it for several reasons that I won’t delve into here in order to avoid the inevitable flaming that results. I fully understand the reasoning behind it, but do not agree with the final decision.

    One thing I would like to note, though, is that the Ontario studies that I have read suggest that the ultra-high minimum length limits do nothing to help the size structure of a population. There are so few fish that get that big, that it becomes insignificant to protect them fully. With the heavy release ethic in place among musky fisherman, this protection does nothing additional. With the occasional big fish cuaght incidently by ‘tourists’, the major factor in mortality becomes poor handling. These incidentals are mostly caught in the summer months when temps are up and the fish are vulnerable to mis-handling. Mandated release of these big fish often results in dead fish anyway.

    Tim

    gary_wellman
    South Metro
    Posts: 6057
    #523042

    Quote:


    I dont know that this really makes a difference or not. Aside from a russian buddy of mine, Ive never heard of anyone keeping a ski…


    Lots of 30″ pike and 40″ muskies at most taxidermey shops!

    As far as a minimum length set. I’m a happy person!!!!!

    DaveB
    Inver Grove Heights MN
    Posts: 4497
    #539323

    If I have 20 musky cheeks in my freezer, am I over the limit?

    Bob Bowman
    MN
    Posts: 3548
    #540238

    Quote:


    If I have 20 musky cheeks in my freezer, am I over the limit?


    No, just tells me you must be friends with BrianK

    I am all for the 48″ mark

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.