SAY NO TO BASS PRO.. not at this cost..

  • oldrat
    Upper Midwest
    Posts: 1531
    #1270514

    LINK

    basically want to destroy wetlands to build a Bass Pro Shops..

    this is almost as good as Richfield giving Cabalas Millions of dollars with the promise that it would bring in tourism..

    it has failed miserably…

    Sorry.. Bass Pro can come but not at the loss of wetlands..the price is way too high..

    jetdriver
    Hudson WI
    Posts: 491
    #931206

    Did I miss something Looks they are trying to build a car lot not a Bass Pro Shop.
    Anyway, so much for Gov. Walker for Sportsmen

    Coreyhuberty
    Brainerd,MN
    Posts: 322
    #931211

    I heard they where going to build in Rodgers, but doesn’t make sense with Cabelas their……….guy at work could of been full of bs though.

    Randy Wieland
    Lebanon. WI
    Posts: 13613
    #931212

    Quote:


    Did I miss something Looks they are trying to build a car lot not a Bass Pro Shop.
    Anyway, so much for Gov. Walker for Sportsmen


    You may have missed it in the article. “The state Department of Natural Resources approved a permit for the project last year.” That was before Walker took office. Also, Bergstrom donated more money to Tom Barret than he did for Walker

    dougie
    Sobieski,Wi
    Posts: 464
    #931216

    Here’s a update. They are NO longer interested in the land.

    LINK

    drew-evans
    rochester MN
    Posts: 1099
    #931222

    never been to a bass pro shop but i them for backing out of this deal.

    wmahnke
    Eau Claire, WI
    Posts: 100
    #931236

    just because the press wrote it doesnt mean that its the whole truth just sayin

    oldrat
    Upper Midwest
    Posts: 1531
    #931241

    its good to hear that BPS isn’t going to contribute to destroying wetlands..

    wetlands must be preserved…there are too few of them to begin with.. now is not the time to destroy what we have left..

    not for a Bass Pro.. and certainly not for a Car dealership as well..

    Tom P.
    Whitehall Wi.
    Posts: 3532
    #931349

    It would sure be nice when something like this comes up they would put up pictures of the area in question. Why the DNR approved it then another part of the DNR tried to shut it down. What gives some one up there having power issues. YES I CAN ……NO YOU CAN`T

    bret_clark
    Sparta, WI
    Posts: 9362
    #931351

    Quote:


    It would sure be nice when something like this comes up they would put up pictures of the area in question. Why the DNR approved it then another part of the DNR tried to shut it down. What gives some one up there having power issues. YES I CAN ……NO YOU CAN`T


    I totally agree

    Being in a business that deals with DNR wet land permits on a regular basis I can tell you some of the areas the DNR considers wet lands would not support life unless they were rehabbed and the DNR has no intentions of sticking money into such areas. Why shouldn’t someone be able to improve these types of grounds?

    For the DNR it is all about the all mighty dollar purchasing permits in such situations and not protecting anything that might be living there. That is a liberals job

    Not saying that would be the case in this situation, very hard to tell without a visit or pictures as mentioned. Just saying at time the DNR steps way out of bounds with there power hungry attitude.

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m all about saving life filled wet lands, but against tire filled misquote heavens that support nothing, but are considered a wet land by the DNR!

    dougie
    Sobieski,Wi
    Posts: 464
    #931467

    In my opion (which doesn’t matter much) there is not much if any wildlife living in this area. If anybody knows Green Bay the area is on Lombardi Ave just off Hiway 41. The Packers own alot of land just east of this.

    bret_clark
    Sparta, WI
    Posts: 9362
    #931476

    Quote:


    In my opion (which doesn’t matter much) there is not much if any wildlife living in this area.


    That was my point and I can’t agree more in this type of situation.

    From the way it sounds, filling it won’t hurt a thing plus make the land useful once again.

    The whole thing over land like this is a battle on who is going to get money for permitting. Bass Pro probably backed out of it to avoid the hassle

    mbenson
    Minocqua, Wisconsin
    Posts: 3842
    #931608

    Here’s the part that ticks me off!!! Yes I want jobs created, but just like everything else DNR related, some politician wants to go over their head. Go through the process!!! Fill it in if it makes sense, but mitigate to keep the same amount of wetland (or as much as possible) and if it is a tire infested mosquito maker, make it so there is more flow in it… and it will still be a skeeter maker!!!

    Mark

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.