Should we start thinking of names for the new LA football team?
December 1, 2010 at 12:44 pm
#1269722
IDO » Forums » Fishing Forums » General Discussion Forum » Just trying to help
Should we start thinking of names for the new LA football team?
BK, I’m thinking since LA already has the “LA Kings”, it would only be appropraite for them to become the
“LA Q****s”
Yea, I saw that LA was trying to get a professional football team. The same could be said for Minnesota….
Quote:
Yea, I saw that LA was trying to get a professional football team. The same could be said for Minnesota….
<snicker…snicker>
Quote:
I’m thinking since LA already has the “LA Kings”, it would only be appropraite for them to become the
“LA Q****s”
Quote:
How about LA SPA. Spoiled, Pampered Athletes.
![]()
Let’s combine these two suggestions and call them the . . .
DRAMA QUEENS
Quote:
BK, I’m thinking since LA already has the “LA Kings”, it would only be appropraite for them to become the
“LA Q****s”
I hear they are going to bump up guide licenses for Captains named Brian who fish on pools 3 and 4 of the Mississippi to pay for a stadium. In Minnesota, I should add.
Where they go, where they stay, or what we call them doesn’t matter so much.
Just so long as we can’t accurately refer to them as
“the NFL team subsidized by the taxpayers of Minnesota”
Maybe we shouldn’t allocate any state money to the DNR. Let the resort owners and Chamber of Commerce’s do their own management and stocking. They are a bunch of collective millionaires anyway, why do they get state aid for their business.
Man I hate winter…
Millionaires.. Billionaires..they don’t get thier money from each other…but they will get it from somewhere.
Quote:
Maybe we shouldn’t allocate any state money to the DNR. Let the resort owners and Chamber of Commerce’s do their own management and stocking. They are a bunch of collective millionaires anyway, why do they get state aid for their business.
Man I hate winter…
Assuming Mark Holsten isn’t reappointed, the next commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources faces a challenge in convincing the public (and state lawmakers) that the agency needs to raise hunting and fishing fees.
The agency already is laying that groundwork by spending $71,000 to survey the opinions of 2,000 past and current license holders on license fees. The survey, conducted by Responsive Management of West Virginia, is just about completed. Read Entire Story Here<<
Might not be a bad idea Mr. Pug.
Quote:
Maybe we shouldn’t allocate any state money to the DNR. Let the resort owners and Chamber of Commerce’s do their own management and stocking. They are a bunch of collective millionaires anyway, why do they get state aid for their business.
Considering what happened shortly after we were fooled into voting a constitutional amendment to provide more dedicated DNR funding . . . I think the resort owners and Chambers of Commerce could be trusted to do the right things with those funds much more so than some d@3n bureaucrat in the ivory halls of St Paul.
<gets down off soapbox and goes to prepare for the Ice Fishing show >
hey can one of you tell me why the Lakers are the LA Lakers? are there a bunch of Lakes in the Los Angeles area?
does this have anything to do with a new football team?
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.