Harmless Football Talk

that must mean the Vikes are the best 1-2 team?

I am waiting for someone to analyze the Vikes and the Fudgies…. both have now faced the Lions and the results of each team should tell us something ??? Im waiting …

big G

The pack better deflate their heads and get it together. This is coming from a packers fan

I’m not sure if it is the Packers or Bears. I am 100% positive it’s not the Queens. Skol Vikes.

I will get the ball rolling…..

Vikings vs Lions = Vikes 14 point win
Fudgies vs Lions = Fudgies 2 point win

Doing the math….

big G

G,
Would you rather have beat the Lions by 14 points verses 2 points or be 3-1 verses 1-2? You might want to stick to music and leave the math to someone else.

math isn’t one of G’s strong points, he can count to 2 so give hime some credit.

Quote:

---

I will get the ball rolling…..

Vikings vs Lions = Vikes 14 point win
Fudgies vs Lions = Fudgies 2 point win

Doing the math….

big G

---

The Vikings have beat one team so far this year. The Packers have beat three teams. Neither team has looked very impressive in any of those victories.
What can you tell from the games so far this year? Not much other than if any of the teams from the NFC North want to go anywhere in the play-offs, they better get a whole lot better between now and the end of the year.

still living in the past there Big G?

Actually, I am looking to the future…. after seeing the Fudgies eek one out against the Lions and seeing the Bears (who beat the fudgies) get beat by the hapless Giants, I am liking our chances more and more…. The Fudgies are who I thought they were…. so far The future is bright, I have to wear

big G

Quote:

---

Actually, I am looking to the future…. after seeing the Fudgies eek one out against the Lions and seeing the Bears (who beat the fudgies) get beat by the hapless Giants, I am liking our chances more and more…. The Fudgies are who I thought they were…. so far The future is bright, I have to wear

big G

---

As the saying goes…..it’s you’re dream Big G. May as well make it whatever you want.

An ugly win is still a “w”.
Packers are less a running game, and like the “Tower of Power” lund85 said.
vikes are without recievers, pack without a running game, lions best team without a win, bears benefiting from great defensive play——think they all have things to work on.

As somebody who attended the packers game yesterday, let me just say that everyone who had them in the Super Bowl, must have missed the complete inability of their defense to get off the field last year and this year so far……

This must be fixed should they have aspirations in the playoffs.

Pal,
I’m still trying to figure out where in the heck they hid 8 of the Packers defenders in the 2nd half. All you could see in the second half was the 3 – 320# linemen trying to put pressure on the QB. The remaining 8 defenders were nowhere to be seen on the TV screen until either Hill or one of the recievers carried the ball 15 yards down field.

Now with Morgan Burnett out for the season, how much more are we going to have to watch Jarad Bush?

Quote:

---

Pal,
Now with Morgan Burnett out for the season, how much more are we going to have to watch Jarad Bush?

---

You won’t have to watch him at all since the bum that plays for the packers is named Jarrett Bush.

As I have a pretty sweet bird’s eye view of the field, the Packers rushed 3 quite a few times, and in fact a number of times dropped Matthews into coverage along with other D lineman. They really appear to have the same problem as last year, in that they cannot get a stop on 3rd down to get off the field. They did have 2-3 opportunities for turnovers they did not convert, which would have helped though.

Of course Nelson fumbling the kickoff right in front of me and also the offense only being on the field 4 times in the second half, of which 2 were turnovers and the other’s zero points was not helping much either.

If this is the D we have ( maybe it can improve ), the offense has to hold the ball much more than they did to keep them off the field. While they only gave up field goals in the 2nd half, we do not play the Lions every week. We do have to play a few teams that can find the end zone against our soft defense and zone coverages.

Pal

Quote:

---

after seeing the Fudgies

---

I must have missed something somewhere….

Where did the pack get this “nickname”?

Its a twist on the old term Viking fans have for Packer Backers. Here’s a clue…

So Viking backers are also

I don’t run around saying I love the pack…. or that I am a packer… although I do love a good piece of fudge, I refuse to pack it…. get it ???

It applies about as much as the queens….

big G

Quote:

---

although I do love a good piece of fudge, I refuse to pack it…. get it ???

It applies about as much as the queens….

---

Is St Cloud/Isle a suburb of San Francisco? I believe that is the only place this dialect can be deciphered.

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

although I do love a good piece of fudge, I refuse to pack it…. get it ???

It applies about as much as the queens….

---

Is St Cloud/Isle a suburb of San Francisco? I believe that is the only place this dialect can be deciphered.

---

I see you got it…. …from The Sand Prairie…. OMFG !!! I can type s l o w e r if you would like…

big G

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

although I do love a good piece of fudge, I refuse to pack it…. get it ???

It applies about as much as the queens….

---

Is St Cloud/Isle a suburb of San Francisco? I believe that is the only place this dialect can be deciphered.

---

I see you got it…. …from The Sand Prairie…. OMFG !!! I can type s l o w e r if you would like…

big G

---

Well it used to be harmless football talk anyway. (thread title)
Why so harsh Big G? Its only football! Is it really that personal to you?

“Harmless Football Talk” this post should have been axed the moment it was typed.

Nothing like a poster who posts an inflammatory bs poll and then sits back and never participates in the replies.

ET

I would have to agree with Cougareye. I’m goin fishin in a half hour!

Quote:

---

“Harmless Football Talk” this post should have been axed the moment it was typed.

Nothing like a poster who posts an inflammatory bs poll and then sits back and never participates in the replies.

ET

---

I just wanted to see how many “clever” Packer fans would actually vote without even questioning whether they were, in fact, the worst or the second worst 3-1 team in the NFL.

Mission accomplished.

Is that your way of finding serenity? I’m late, gotta go…

DaveB,
I hope you don’t hurt your arm patting yourself on the back.

After watching the first 4 weeks of the season, this clever Packer fan doesn’t have a problem picking the Packers and Bears as the teams that have looked the worst of the 3-1 teams. Do you really expect someone to say they have looked better than Atlanta, NO, Pitts, Jets, NE, Balt, or Houston?

I also think either the Vikings or Dallas are the best looking 1-2 teams out there.

I never expect any logic from Packer fans.

In fact, some of them were talking Super Bowl for the Pack a few weeks ago while others were pointing out that their defense looks like swiss cheese and their o-line is suspect.

I just think it is funny how fast green koolaid folks jump on and off the bandwagon regarding the current greatness of their team.