2005 Chevy Colorado for tow vehicle?

  • jeff_hansen
    Posts: 475
    #1267428

    This summer I’ll be in the market for a different truck. I will have the opportunity to get a good deal on an ’05 Chevy Colorado with the 5 cyl. Vortec. Has anyone had much towing experience with the Colorado? I’ll be pulling a ’09 Ranger 1750 Reata with a 150 Yamaha. I was able to try the rig out this weekend and it seemed to handle the boat well, but I’d like to hear about other people’s experiences before I purchase.

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 22538
    #868532

    5 cyl ??? Never even heard of it..

    big G

    jeff_hansen
    Posts: 475
    #868533

    Yep, two engine choices, 4 cyl. or the inline 5 cyl. (220hp)

    trumar
    Rochester, Mn
    Posts: 5967
    #868536

    Quote:


    Yep, two engine choices, 4 cyl. or the inline 5 cyl. (220hp)


    Tho, I have not had the chance to work on them yet ,I heard the engines(5cyl) was high maintenance

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 22538
    #868537

    Wow, I did not know that Chevy had a I5 gas engine. With 220 HP, I would think if your not towing over 5000lbs, it should be fine.

    big G

    coletrain01
    Rochester MN
    Posts: 193
    #868539

    my buddy had a 06 or 07 gmc canyon, basically the same thing but the gm version. had decent power but idk if i would want that for pulling a boat of your size. i would step up to a 1/2 ton imo.

    trumar
    Rochester, Mn
    Posts: 5967
    #868540

    a 242-hp, 3.7-liter five-cylinder

    From Edmunds.com

    Reviews of the Chevrolet Colorado have been lukewarm at best. Although this truck is roomier and better-handling than its predecessor, its engines, cabin accommodations and overall build quality have always fallen short alongside the more complete packages from Dodge, Nissan and Toyota.

    Steve Plantz
    SE MN
    Posts: 12240
    #868545

    I have never driven one but I am not a fan of mid size trucks. You do not gain that much more in MPG IMO and you loose space and power. If I was pulling that much boat I would go with a full size 1/2 ton as well.

    jeff_hansen
    Posts: 475
    #868546

    I’ve been kind of leaning towards the full size, but the only reason I’m considering the Colorado is because I put on a ton of driving miles (work, hunting, etc.)… the owner currently gets 22-24mpg on the highway. I currently own an ’02 Ford F150 Supercrew. It’s been a great truck but the mileage is not so great 12 – 16 mpg.

    deertracker
    Posts: 9253
    #868549

    I think you would be better off buying a little commuter car if it was in the buget.
    DT

    tom_gursky
    Michigan's Upper Peninsula(Iron Mountain)
    Posts: 4751
    #868552

    I was told by my local chevy dealer, who runs a 19′ Ranger, that I would be disappointed by the 5 cyl Colorado for pulling my 2003 1750 Crestliner.
    I currently run a 2004 F-150 4X4 Super Cab, 5.4 V8. They switched to the german injection system in 2004 and I get an ave 12 mpg pulling the boat… about 17 mpg w/o boat.
    All my 1/2 ton Silverado 4X4s with 5.3 V8s averaged 13 w/boat and 18 w/o boat.
    My 2005 Toyota Tundra 4.7L Ex/Cab 4X4 (285bhp) averaged 14 w/boat and 18-19 mpg w/o boat. That was a sweet truck…lost my job and had to sell her…

    Steve Plantz
    SE MN
    Posts: 12240
    #868554

    Not sure if this is an option for you or not but I have a second car for driving to work and runnig around town. I only use my truck when I need to tow my boat or camper or when I need to hawl something. This helps keep the miles off my truck and hopefully I will be able to keep it longer and not have to replace sooner like I would if I was driving it everyday. Yes this is a bigger expence up front but if you look at the big picture you will save money in the long term by saving money on gas and making your truck last longer.

    joshbjork
    Center of Iowa
    Posts: 727
    #868585

    Have one. Never pulled anything big with it. I would not have guessed the mpg was that high. Headlights go out a lot. I like the motor though. It’s a bit loud compared to a dakota but it really revs up and is fun to drive around. Does ok with a 1000# boat but that’s all I know.

    bob schroden
    Cold Spring, MN
    Posts: 281
    #868603

    I have a 2007 Colorado Crew Cab 4×4 with the I-5.
    I could not be happier with it. I have 30,000 miles on it so far and the only maintenance is the oil changes. The I-5 gets 20-21 MPG easy without pulling anything. It has plenty of pulling power for my 17′ boat. Overall it does everything I need out of it and it was 7-8K less than a full size. I have the 3LT with every option fully loaded.
    They hold their resale value VERY VERY well, much better than any full size. If you find a good deal on the 2005, I’d say go for it with no hesitation.

    buzzellc
    Central Wisconsin
    Posts: 1
    #868626

    I’ve got a 2006 GMC Canyon crew cab with the I5. I used to pull a 16′ Maritime Skiff with no problems and now pull my single axle enclosed work trailer. Mileage without a load has been 20 in town and 25 on the highway. Check the truck you are looking at to make sure it has the 3.73 rear end, they are available in a 3.42 which will cause the truck to hunt for gears under load. The I5 also has had issues with the valve train. Mine had the head replaced under warrenty at 60,000 miles. Other than that it has been a good truck. For what it’s worth I’ve had a Ford F150 Supercrew as well and really would prefer it over the Canyon

    Steve Plantz
    SE MN
    Posts: 12240
    #868647

    Welcome to In-Depth Outdoors buzzellc!!!

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.