Pack winning!

  • francisco4
    Holmen, WI
    Posts: 3607
    December 8, 2009 at 4:54 am #1265175

    Looks like the Pack are going to pull this one out! The season is not over yet.

    FDR

    James Holst
    Keymaster
    SE Minnesota
    Posts: 18926
    December 8, 2009 at 6:24 am #821270

    Quote:

    Pack is back

    I’d love to see the Pack make the playoffs and force a Round 3 with the Vikings. That would be a battle for the ages.

    bigpike
    Posts: 6259
    December 8, 2009 at 6:32 am #821271

    Thompson bashers have gotten awefull quite as rookies Raji, Jones and Mathews continue to make plays week in and week out and make our D very formidable. Finely is continuing developing into the next superstar TE. Rodgers continues to develop into a perenial pro bowl QB. The NFL’s 1# ranked D was put together by Ted not Riverrat. Cmon haters, give us a little hate

    85lund
    Menomonie, WI
    Posts: 2317
    December 8, 2009 at 2:25 pm #821308

    I’m just looking forward to a fresh start for the Pack NEXT YEAR. You can’t win the big one every year, but it seems like a lot of Packer’s fans think we should.

    jeff_jensen
    cassville ,wis
    Posts: 3053
    December 8, 2009 at 2:36 pm #821315

    I couldn’t see the game very well with all of the yellow flags blocking my view Good win regardless. Encouraging to see the D respond well without Harris and Kampman. That Matthews kid sure has a feel for the game, fun player to watch

    b-curtis
    Farmington, MN
    Posts: 1438
    December 8, 2009 at 3:10 pm #821334

    Most of those PI calls were pretty ticky-tacky, both ways. And listening to those guys gushing about the Packers all night got to be a little much. But I do enjoy listening to Gruden. He makes me laugh, especially when they pull out old footage of him.

    The D is a lot better without Kampman. I feel bad for him as he is not an OLB, but it is nice not seeing a RB out in the flat burning him for a TD anymore. What a transformation by the D. They got a guy in there that has a great scheme and knows how to coach. But to be fair, the Pack is playing a much softer schedule than they did last year so that helps. But still to have the #1 D in total D is pretty impressive from where they were last year.

    kooty
    Keymaster
    1 hour 15 mins to the Pond
    Posts: 18101
    December 8, 2009 at 3:29 pm #821300

    This is all due to the Pack’s weak schedule. They are not that good.

    chomps
    Sioux City IA
    Posts: 3974
    December 8, 2009 at 3:34 pm #821341

    man the snow hitting the ground is hurting my head! $1 beers and free chili, my tab was $16, oh was there a game last night? Good day to leave early from work and bake Christmas cookies.

    b-curtis
    Farmington, MN
    Posts: 1438
    December 8, 2009 at 4:26 pm #821381

    The schedule reminds me of the Queens schedule. Let’s face it; both teams are not facing the hardest schedules ever created. The only team with the winning record the Pack has beaten is the Cowboys. And the only team the Queens have beaten (twice in case anybody forgot) is the Pack.

    rmartin
    United States
    Posts: 1434
    December 8, 2009 at 4:29 pm #821383

    Quote:

    This is all due to the Pack’s weak schedule. They are not that good.


    Sounds like sour grapes after Sunday nights whuppin’
    Speaking of weak schedules, both teams have nearly identical schedules with the exception of the queens playing Carolina and the NY Giants whereas the Packers played the Cowboys and the Buccaneers. The words “Over rated” comes to mind. If you’re gonna slam us…

    rkd-jim
    Fountain City, WI.
    Posts: 1606
    December 8, 2009 at 5:06 pm #821407

    Quote:

    This is all due to the Pack’s weak schedule. They are not that good.

    OOOOOHHH!!! Do I sense “QB envy”??? We have an up and coming star in the league…..and you have our “sloppy seconds” with nothing for the future except…….. “maybe I will…….maybe I won’t”!!!

    kooty
    Keymaster
    1 hour 15 mins to the Pond
    Posts: 18101
    December 8, 2009 at 5:15 pm #821414

    I would like to thank all of you for biting!! Funny the argument works for the Pack fans about the Vikes schedule.

    Packer fans are THE ultimate sports fans.

    igotone
    Posts: 1746
    December 8, 2009 at 5:26 pm #821425

    Quote:

    This is all due to the Pack’s weak schedule. They are not that good.

    Almost same teams played by both Minn and Green bay

    Soft I do not know, will they play each other again in playoffs, maybe and if so Minn may not B one and done.

    Minn has to try and go 2-2 in the next four games.
    With Bret finding the other team with his passes again it will B interesting

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    December 8, 2009 at 5:33 pm #821433

    Quote:

    I would like to thank all of you for biting!! Funny the argument works for the Pack fans about the Vikes schedule.

    Packer fans are THE ultimate sports fans.


    My guess is they weren’t confident to open the other threads before last night. Bring on round 3. I’d like nothing better than seeing Packer fans get their hopes up, only to be dashed. In fact, make round three nice and close where the Vikes pull it out at the end like Tiger Woods.

    James Holst
    Keymaster
    SE Minnesota
    Posts: 18926
    December 8, 2009 at 5:36 pm #821437

    Quote:

    Quote:

    I would like to thank all of you for biting!! Funny the argument works for the Pack fans about the Vikes schedule.

    Packer fans are THE ultimate sports fans.


    My guess is they weren’t confident to open the other threads before last night. Bring on round 3. I’d like nothing better than seeing Packer fans get their hopes up, only to be dashed. In fact, make round three nice and close where the Vikes pull it out at the end like Tiger Woods.

    A round three with the Pack, regardless of which side you root for, would be awesome.

    When it comes to making comparisons based on schedules… head to head is what counts.

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    December 8, 2009 at 5:47 pm #821443

    Quote:

    When it comes to making comparisons based on schedules… head to head is what counts.


    You mean like 2-0?
    I agree. Why not a round 3! That would be fun.

    If I had it my way the Packers and Viking would trade off winning super bowls every year and forget the rest of the league.

    chomps
    Sioux City IA
    Posts: 3974
    December 8, 2009 at 5:54 pm #821448

    I’m still waiting for the queens fearless poster child, big g to chime in here, he should, as always, have some infinite word of wisdom

    rmartin
    United States
    Posts: 1434
    December 8, 2009 at 7:56 pm #821514

    Quote:

    When it comes to making comparisons based on schedules… head to head is what counts.


    It is not who you play so much as when you play them.

    Quote:

    I would like to thank all of you for biting!!


    Some people take this fishing thing way too seriously

    bigpike
    Posts: 6259
    December 8, 2009 at 8:39 pm #821533

    Round three would be great, I cannot deny the Vikings have more talent this year and they are all in. It is pretty tough to beat the same team three times in the same year in football. The ratings would be wild and the Packers would come in with blood in there eyes plus the Vikings have coach Chili the winner of how many playoff games???

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 22456
    December 8, 2009 at 9:27 pm #821570

    Here I am chomps (I hang out on the Huntin side mostly now, what with Hunting season here and all) anyways, I have little to add, seems most “grasp” the obvious…. Head to head, Vikings 2, Fudgies 0… one even at mighty Lambow field…. Thanks for thinking of me

    big G

    eye_hunter
    Posts: 517
    December 9, 2009 at 10:15 pm #822065

    ok very dumb question, who is the queens. sorry guys, not a big football guy but i love the sport.

    chomps
    Sioux City IA
    Posts: 3974
    December 9, 2009 at 10:25 pm #822069

    these guys in white pants and pretty purple jerseys from Minnesota are the queens, big g is the official fan of the century and they inspired this!

    eye_hunter
    Posts: 517
    December 9, 2009 at 10:31 pm #822070

    so how did they get the name queens

    Mike Stephens
    WI.
    Posts: 1722
    December 9, 2009 at 10:39 pm #822072

    Chomps; I can hear your gear spinnin

    chomps
    Sioux City IA
    Posts: 3974
    December 9, 2009 at 10:50 pm #822076

    Quote:

    so how did they get the name queens

    Well it goes like this, they are all really men dressed in womens clothing, drive around in mini vans, elect former all star wrestlers as governors, quick to point out Iowa has no professional teams…duh!,complain unceasingly about their team being the laughing sock of the NFL, till now. They now have the bandwagon loaded up, and are ready to roll right into the Super Bowl. They tend to wear flip flops, and they like the sound they make walking out of the hair salon. We used to call them drag queens, that was too long so we shortened it up to just queens.

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 22456
    December 9, 2009 at 10:56 pm #822080

    And then there is that crazy soul, with any identity crisis from Iowa….CHOMPS

Viewing 27 posts - 1 through 27 (of 27 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.