Look out!!! Here come the PACK!!!

  • chris-tuckner
    Hastings/Isle MN
    Posts: 12318
    November 16, 2009 at 12:17 am #1264908

    Boy does Dallas look bad!
    Bro in law playing me in Fantasy Football…Has Witten, Romo and Folk!!!

    riveratt
    Central Wisconsin US-of-A
    Posts: 1464
    November 16, 2009 at 12:30 am #816069

    It sure isn’t that the Packers look solid. I’m amazed at how poor Dallas looks. Is Romo even awake? Imagine if my Bears had Dallas today, it’d end up in triple OT waiting for someone to flip a coin to proclaim a winner.

    I suppose this win will keep away from TT and McFlurry for a few more days.

    Ted Wedul
    holmen, wi
    Posts: 765
    November 16, 2009 at 12:31 am #816071

    Tuck…after watching the vikes game earlier, I might have to take back my comment about their receiving corp being inferior to the packs… They are looking REALLY good!! Setting themselves up to make a deep run in the playoffs… Congrats.

    Brian Robinson
    central Neb
    Posts: 3914
    November 16, 2009 at 12:40 am #816074

    Let me get this straight: they get embarassed by the Bucs (THE BUCS!!!), but then win against the crygirls? I don’t get it. Just like the Eagles are always remembered for losing to the chokeland faders, the pack will be cited for losing to the bucs. Don’t let them get your hopes up, they’ll only let you down.

    jtimm
    Mora,MN
    Posts: 198
    November 16, 2009 at 12:02 pm #816135

    Don’t let them get your hopes up, they’ll only let you down.

    This is more of a quote for the Viking fans out there!

    b-curtis
    Farmington, MN
    Posts: 1438
    November 16, 2009 at 1:44 pm #816150

    I think the Queen fans need to thank the Packers as they can now hold their head up and say they have beaten a team with a winning record!

    I know everybody wants TT and MM fired, and it sounds like some feel that it was the Cowboys that just played bad and had nothing to do with the Packers (I bet if the Queens would have basically shut them out we would be hearing about how awesome MN D is), but I think Capers is a great Defensive coach. He built the Pitt D back in the day. I don’t think you just forget how to coach. I think giving him a couple years the Packer D will be one of the best in the league. Of course if you clean house, he would be gone too.

    barebackjack
    New Prague, MN.
    Posts: 1023
    November 16, 2009 at 7:22 pm #816239

    Quote:

    Boy does Dallas look bad!

    What you can note here is that He didnt say GB looked good which I would whole heartedly agree with.

    chris-tuckner
    Hastings/Isle MN
    Posts: 12318
    November 16, 2009 at 8:56 pm #816250

    Quote:

    Quote:

    Boy does Dallas look bad!

    What you can note here is that He didnt say GB looked good which I would whole heartedly agree with.

    I was waiting for someone to say that!!
    For you..

    Hey…Arron Rodgers ran one in and threw one, so I at least got the Fantasy points!

    nater3
    Webster City, IA
    Posts: 198
    November 16, 2009 at 9:31 pm #816261

    If you can’t admit that GB’s defense was on fire, then you are just blindly bias. Offense didn’t do anything special, but Romo looked terrible because they made him look that way. They shut down Barber and beat the snot out of Romo and blanket his receivers.

    riveratt
    Central Wisconsin US-of-A
    Posts: 1464
    November 17, 2009 at 2:24 am #816303

    Or maybe, and I’m just spitballing here, Dallas played so poor as to make the Packers D look that good. I’m guessing it was more of each than anyone of the other.

    garvi
    LACROSSE WI
    Posts: 1137
    November 17, 2009 at 2:42 pm #816361

    This really getting old everyone on here is so bias to there team it is sicking

    What happen to all the a win is a win BS that was going on earlier in the season but then the packers upset a team and it all changes to the other team just played bad.

    to all you couch potato coaches.

    And by the way the Bears still suck

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.