New Vikings Nickname

  • targaman
    Inactive
    Wilton, WI
    Posts: 2759
    November 15, 2009 at 8:53 pm #816035

    lame

    bigpike
    Posts: 6259
    November 15, 2009 at 9:03 pm #816037

    Purple Pukers

    Brian Robinson
    central Neb
    Posts: 3914
    November 15, 2009 at 9:17 pm #816038

    Too bad they don’t want one for the losers out in Oakland, because I’ve got a good one: chokeland faders.

    mike-g
    Bloomington,MN
    Posts: 556
    November 15, 2009 at 9:39 pm #816041

    More specifically, they’re looking for a nickname for the D front 4. (Williams x2, Allen & Edwards). Didn’t come up with it, but I like “Shock and AWWE!!”

    enright
    Austin, MN
    Posts: 9
    November 15, 2009 at 10:06 pm #816044

    Purple Reign was the one I submited, showed on the list of favorites during he game.

    LenH
    Wisconsin
    Posts: 2385
    November 15, 2009 at 10:14 pm #816045

    Star Caps Wall

    kooty
    Keymaster
    1 hour 15 mins to the Pond
    Posts: 18101
    November 15, 2009 at 11:05 pm #816053

    I like 3 men and a mullet. Funny stuff.

    jldii
    Posts: 2294
    November 15, 2009 at 11:09 pm #816054

    It wasn’t till only a few minutes left in the game that I thought of it and submitted it……………

    “The Minnesota Wrecking Crew”!

    haywardbound
    New Brighton, MN
    Posts: 1107
    November 15, 2009 at 11:50 pm #816062

    I did see Purple Reign on there during the game, I like that one. I guess mine is out if they are talking about the front 4.

    I thought I could go on Fox and vote, but I don’t see where.

    gregh
    s.e. minn
    Posts: 642
    November 16, 2009 at 12:02 am #816063

    Notice all the “HATERS” that have chimed in were from Wisconsin. One more thing…………Thanks Mike and Ted for allowing the “train to leave the station”

    barebackjack
    New Prague, MN.
    Posts: 1023
    November 16, 2009 at 12:11 am #816066

    I got it, I got it! “Thanks Green Bay”

    targaman
    Inactive
    Wilton, WI
    Posts: 2759
    November 16, 2009 at 12:51 am #816077

    I got it, I got it! You have a qb that will play maybe one more season and we got one that will play at least ten!

    james_walleye
    rochester, mn
    Posts: 325
    November 16, 2009 at 1:16 am #816083

    “the 4 norseman of the apocolypse” you see these guys lined up in front of you and you know the end is near…..

    bigpike
    Posts: 6259
    November 16, 2009 at 1:44 am #816084

    Not haters, just not lovers……

    gregh
    s.e. minn
    Posts: 642
    November 16, 2009 at 1:51 am #816085

    Quote:

    I got it, I got it! You have a qb that will play maybe one more season and we got one that will play at least ten!

    You better hope he last that long, as much time as he(Rogers) spends looking up at the lights he’ll be done after a couple more seasons

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 22418
    November 16, 2009 at 2:19 am #816086

    Quote:

    I got it, I got it! You have a qb that will play maybe one more season and we got one that will play at least ten!

    Let me get this right… you want 10 more seasons like this one ??? If your mgt keeps putting the team they are around Rogers, he will be talking MN before long too A L L A B O A R D !!!

    big G

    Mike Stephens
    WI.
    Posts: 1722
    November 16, 2009 at 2:32 am #816087

    Grape apes, Still chewing SKOL, and smokin dope

    rmartin
    United States
    Posts: 1434
    November 16, 2009 at 2:47 am #816090

    A hoper, a roper and 2 dopers.

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 22418
    November 16, 2009 at 1:31 pm #816142

    Some of these names seem like some would not be fans of the Front 4 ….

    I have a question, that we were discussing yesterday during the game, maybe some of you experts will know. On the play where AP had the ball punched out when he was streaking towards the end zone, the second the ball was punched out, wouldn’t the defensive player, have to take his hands off him ??? The player continued to “tackle” AP (by horsecollar no less)… wouldn’t that be defensive holding ??? It was a loose ball, AP did not have it… how could he tackle him ??? I think it was defensive holding, when he didn’t afford him the oppotunity to try to recover, but rather held and tackled him. What says you guys ???

    big G

    b-curtis
    Farmington, MN
    Posts: 1438
    November 16, 2009 at 1:35 pm #816145

    You can combine Drunk Driver and steroid maskers and go with “Droid”. How about “The Drunk and Drugies”, but that might confuse people with the QB. So maybe “The Drunk Cheaters”?

    b-curtis
    Farmington, MN
    Posts: 1438
    November 16, 2009 at 1:37 pm #816147

    G, I am assuming you are joking, right?

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 22418
    November 16, 2009 at 1:44 pm #816149

    No, I am not a ref ??? The question came up yesterday and my original thought was nobody is on “offense” with a loose ball. My thought was Detroit ball 1/2 the distance (10 yard line) for the horsecollar. If you watch the play, he grabs him by the pads at the neck, then punches the ball out… at a minimum, it was a horsecollar tackle. Do you have an answer ???

    big G

    b-curtis
    Farmington, MN
    Posts: 1438
    November 16, 2009 at 1:59 pm #816152

    I guess the horse collar is a judgment call, but it was all done in the motion of one tackle…I guess I don’t know how to explain it real well. It is not like the ball was knocked out and then they were running down the field and the guy horse collared him. I was talking about you thinking it should be defensive holding because poor AP wasn’t allowed to try to recover the ball. That happens on every fumble. I guess you haven’t had the opportunity to watch Favre fumble the ball much this year, but when he does fumble, the D guy will just lay on top of him.

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 22418
    November 16, 2009 at 2:37 pm #816161

    That was one guys opinion too… if it was done in one motion, then it was just a totally blown missed call. Nice work getting the Favre jab in there…

    big G

    bobberal
    St Cloud MN, Leech Lake
    Posts: 416
    November 16, 2009 at 2:40 pm #816162

    In true Minnesota fashion, It must have been a bad call….LOL

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 22418
    November 16, 2009 at 2:46 pm #816164

    There was no call…??? Can you read ??? Must be a true Fudgepacking fan…

    big G

    cougareye
    Hudson, WI
    Posts: 4145
    November 16, 2009 at 2:48 pm #816165

    G:

    I made the exact same comment to my wife when that play happened. I know I see it through purple tinted glasses, but being a ref for 18 years, my thought on that was holding. The only guy you can hold, trip, leg whip, contact in the back, etc. is the ball carrier. Once he stopped being the ball carrier, he cannot be held, which he clearly was. Not to mention horse collar!

    I’m not whining about the officiating, especially in a blow out win, I’m just saying it was odd, not a play you see everyday. And Edwards did not contact the QB helmet to helmet either.!!!

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 42 total)
1 2

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.