Packers/Vikings………. Who Will Win At Lambeau?

  • DaveB
    Inver Grove Heights MN
    Posts: 4463
    #811924

    The Viking lines completely dominated on both sides of the football. I dont see the weather impacting them enough to for the Packers to complete. As always, they will have to get some Antonio Freeman style lucky bounces to win. Percy Harvin will have a monster day.

    Vikings 31 Pack 17

    kooty
    Keymaster
    1 hour 15 mins to the Pond
    Posts: 18101
    #811926

    If our Dline can get enough pressure with 4 guys(which they should with how poorly the GB O line has been playing), then I like our chances. What is the record for sacks in a game. I hope we break it this weekend.

    Wow, only Tuesday and the bashing has begun. Not that big of a game is it?

    steveo
    W Central Sconnie
    Posts: 4102
    #811935

    this is going to be a great game no doubt. it’s just that I don’t think Minny’s d line is going to play as fast on natural turf. that whole team is designed to play indoors on turf. the game being in GB levels the playing field a bit.

    jldii
    Posts: 2294
    #811939

    A couple things here.

    1. The Vikings lead the league in sacks. The Packers are on pace to give up a league record sacks this year.

    Advantage….Vikings

    2. Natural grass will negate the Vikings speed since they are built to play indoors. Not so at all. If you look at Kevin and Pat Williams, you’d know they are not “speed” players, and with their size, they are not going to be moved off the line on any surface.

    Advantage……Vikings, again.

    3. I heard reported that Green Bay went out and resigned Ahman Green. That along with begging Tauscher out of retirement pretty much sums up the Packers need to develope some sort of running game, because they do not have one, meaning they have to pass the ball, which brings up what I said already. (Refer to point #1)

    Advantage……Vikings again

    4. The Favre -v- Rogers match up. What can Rogers do that Favre can’t? What has Rogers done that Favre hasn’t done already, many times over? Lastly, as Tuckner has already pointed out, Favre knows how to play and win in Lamblow, in those weather conditions. He’s done it how many times?

    Advantage…..Vikings

    5. Last but not least, and I know this is going to really hurt you Packer fans. Coaching.

    Advantage……Yes, Vikings again!!

    6. Because it will be such an emotional moment at games end after beating his former team for the second time this year, Brett Favre will break into tears during his many post game interveiws with the local media.

    steveo
    W Central Sconnie
    Posts: 4102
    #811946

    Packers are number 8 in offense. Vikings are number 12.

    Rogers has a better qb rating than Favre.

    McCarthy’s record against Childress is far superior.

    take off the purple glasses dude.

    Scotty Wells pretty much shut Pat Williams out the first game.

    Allen is a monster no doubt. he will have to be dealt with. They brought Green back more for depth and blocking ability

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 22414
    #811949

    No matter what we say here… or the fact that NFL defense stats having “special team” stats in it…. (thats why sacks & tackles are more pertinent than yardage or point stats for a defense… they are watered down) doesn’t mean a hill of beans come monday. We will see who is spouting then…. I am confident I will be here…. will you ???

    big G

    barebackjack
    New Prague, MN.
    Posts: 1023
    #811952

    ME! Sunday Funday!!! Tippy Cup extravaganza!

    b-curtis
    Farmington, MN
    Posts: 1438
    #811962

    Go ahead and hang your hat on sacks if you think it is more important than points allowed. See you Monday.

    cougareye
    Hudson, WI
    Posts: 4145
    #811970

    The only team to beat the Vikings did so with a great pass rush. I don’t see the Pack getting to Favre and he’ll end up picking apart the Packers D.

    Harvin will be the difference maker!

    I’m looking forward to a great game!

    ET

    nater3
    Webster City, IA
    Posts: 198
    #811971

    You might recall an idiot named Mike Sherman who ran the franchise into the ground as coach and GM. He gave out insane contracts to overrated players that handcuffed the team. I didn’t say we wanted to remain the youngest team in the league. This is an awesome position to be in moving forward. We are currently competitive, young so we don’t have many players going anywhere soon, under the cap so we can sign areas of need such as the o line next season.

    By the way to the genius who said we had to beg Tauscher out of retirement. He never retired. He tore his ACL last season and it just happened to be the last year of his contract so they Packers waited to see how well he recovered before re-signing him. He just was cleared to play, that is why they waited to sign him. They were probably also hoping to not have to sign him and save money with younger players. That obviously didn’t work so well.

    sandbar
    Woodbury, MN
    Posts: 1027
    #811974

    I better throw my 2 cents in here. Since I am a die hard Viking fan, the Purple kool aid is always flowing. I thought the Vikes played a heck of a game against the Steelers last weekend. A few to many bad breaks cost them the game, some questionable calls on both sides of the ball didn’t help. But that’s the way it goes.

    Sunday should be a great game. I think Favre will step up and have a solid game. Harvin and Shank need to hold onto the ball this week. To many drops against the Steelers. Peterson should have a good game, he is due for 150+ yards on the ground.

    Allen and the William brothers could have a field day against the Packers offensive line. I am sure Green Bay is stressing pass protection this week. They aren’t playing the Browns Sunday, so they better be ready.

    Vikings – 31
    Packers – 17

    Skol Vikes!!

    steveo
    W Central Sconnie
    Posts: 4102
    #811979

    salient points Deano.
    these teams are almost identical. home field/turnovers is going to play huge this week just like it did in the first meeting. I’m a little concerned about our red zone offense vs the Vike defense. we will score long and often…

    docfrigo
    Wisconsin
    Posts: 1564
    #811985

    Had to repost after stepping back into reality.

    Packers 77
    Queens 10-in garbage time.

    kooty
    Keymaster
    1 hour 15 mins to the Pond
    Posts: 18101
    #811997

    Come on Ted(bonemover). I know you are reading this and it’s killing you not to reply.

    Vikes – 702
    Pack – 0 survivors.

    This is how it starts.

    Feel the pounding

    Try it

    How can you not love that sound!! All day long baby!!

    Wonder how she feels now???

    cougareye
    Hudson, WI
    Posts: 4145
    #812010

    As a Vikings fan, I’d like to propose that Kooty no longer speaks for the rest of us!!

    Seriously dude, those were the three worst Viking videos I’ve ever seen.

    Vikes still win 77-0 but come on!

    ET

    edited so that I don’t get in trouble like LJ!

    steveo
    W Central Sconnie
    Posts: 4102
    #812015

    look up “electric purple” on wiki.
    official “pride” color

    I ain’t sayin, I’m just sayin’

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 22414
    #812020

    I ain’t sayin either……

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 22414
    #812022

    Quote:


    Go ahead and hang your hat on sacks if you think it is more important than points allowed. See you Monday.


    Ask Rogers if sacks matter…..??? Points allowed don’t mean squat, when you score at least 1 more than the other team…. seems we did that last time ??? See you Monday

    big G

    bigpike
    Posts: 6259
    #812030

    I hate to ever admit I agree with big g but I do. The last two games the Packers played they gave up 6 points. The opponents: Lions and Browns. So it is pretty safe to say that stat is slanted a bit. It will be a tough game, if the Packers cannot protect Rodgers the Vikings will win no matter what, we will see what the Packers coaching staff learned from the last time they played the Vikings. 24-23 Packers

    steveo
    W Central Sconnie
    Posts: 4102
    #812034

    This is fun. Vikes also played both if those teams and gave up more than 6. Tells you nothing but we were better against like opponents.

    chris-tuckner
    Hastings/Isle MN
    Posts: 12318
    #812054

    Quote:


    salient points Deano.
    these teams are almost identical.

    we will score long and often…


    SteveO….Love ya like a brutha…But really?? Name two running backs on the pack that are = to Peterson and Taylor. Tight ends, Vikes win…the only place I think we are even is the receiving corps. Most of the cold games I have seen (On TV) in Lambeau was when Rodgers was on the side lines in the hand muffs while his mentor #4 was out playing in it. Remember also that GB’s defense has to defend on natural turf. Does that mean they are “Designed” to play on natural turf?
    Anyways, I hope Rodgers does well. He has been making me a boatload of Fantasy points every Sunday passing because they have no running game. I just hope it’s not a blow out either way. I would love to see a good hard faught game.

    muskyman
    Arkansaw, Wisconsin
    Posts: 945
    #812061

    Passing Yards
    Aaron Rodgers GB 384 yds
    Brett Favre Min 271 yds

    Rushing Yards
    Ryan Grant GB 51 yds
    Adrian Peterson Min 55 yds

    Receiving Yards
    Jermichael Finley GB 128 yds
    Bernard Berrian Min 75 yds

    Well I hate to break it to all you Viking fans but…the only reason you guys won last time is your pro bowl Jared Allen up against our rookie left tackle. You can bet that won’t be the same game this time. Clifton will be back at his post and Allen won’t fair so well this time. And I sure hope AP has a few more yards to take the load off Brent, we all know what happens when he plays from behind. Oh yeah and your best DB is hurt I hear? Must be your turn to put a rookie on the field! Rodgers had 384 yards last time, you’d better hope that isn’t the case this time. The only way the Queens win is if their D gives Brent 20 and 30 yard fields

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 22414
    #812062

    Quote:


    This is fun. Vikes also played both if those teams and gave up more than 6. Tells you nothing but we were better against like opponents.


    With your analogy then this should cinch the decision for you…how did the Fudgepackers do against, lets not say “like opponents” but “THE OPPONENTS”… Brett Favre and his Vikings last go around…..

    Your right !!! This is FUN

    big G

    riveratt
    Central Wisconsin US-of-A
    Posts: 1464
    #812069

    Quote:


    we all know what happens when he plays from behind.



    I know I know! He sets the record for come from behind wins? I think he is at 41 right now. Most QBs never even play in 41 NFL games much less come from behind and win in that many, lol.

    fireline
    Rochester
    Posts: 813
    #812072

    What ever team show up to play !!!!

    bzzsaw
    Hudson, Wi
    Posts: 3478
    #812076

    G… What happened to your hair???? That picture is hillarious. Its gonna be a cold winter though.

    Packers 28
    Vikings 12

    (Jarrad Allen scores 6 safeties on the Pack)

    chris-tuckner
    Hastings/Isle MN
    Posts: 12318
    #812077

    Quote:


    Passing Yards
    Aaron Rodgers GB 384 yds
    Brett Favre Min 271 yds

    Rushing Yards
    Ryan Grant GB 51 yds
    Adrian Peterson Min 55 yds

    Receiving Yards
    Jermichael Finley GB 128 yds
    Bernard Berrian Min 75 yds

    Well I hate to break it to all you Viking fans but…the only reason you guys won last time is your pro bowl Jared Allen up against our rookie left tackle. You can bet that won’t be the same game this time. Clifton will be back at his post and Allen won’t fair so well this time. And I sure hope AP has a few more yards to take the load off Brent, we all know what happens when he plays from behind. Oh yeah and your best DB is hurt I hear? Must be your turn to put a rookie on the field! Rodgers had 384 yards last time, you’d better hope that isn’t the case this time. The only way the Queens win is if their D gives Brent 20 and 30 yard fields


    Ryan Grant:
    Wk Date Opp Att Yds TD Fum Pts
    1 09/13/09 CHI 16 61 1 0 6
    2 09/20/09 CIN 14 46 1 1 6
    3 09/27/09 @STL 26 99 0 0 0
    4 10/05/09 @MIN 11 51 0 0 0
    5 BYE – – – – – –
    6 10/18/09 DET 24 90 0 0 0
    7 10/25/09 @CLE 27 148 1 0 14

    Adrian Peterson:
    Wk Date Opp AttYds TD Fum Pts
    1 09/13/09 @CLE 25 180 3 0 30
    2 09/20/09 @DET 15 92 1 1 6
    3 09/27/09 SF 19 85 0 0 0
    4 10/05/09 GB 25 55 1 1 6
    5 10/11/09 @STL 15 69 2 0 12
    6 10/18/09 BAL 22 143 0 0 8
    7 10/25/09 @PIT 18 69 1 0 6

    I dunno…looks like fuzzy Lambeau math to me.

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 22414
    #812079

    Quote:


    G… What happened to your hair???? That picture is hillarious. Its gonna be a cold winter though.

    (Jarrad Allen scores 6 safeties on the Pack)


    OK… that was good….

    big G

    steveo
    W Central Sconnie
    Posts: 4102
    #812080

    Tuck
    these teams are very, very close to each other. Vikes pass rush is superior. I will give you that. Peterson is a monster but has been fairly benign this year especially the first game against the Pack.. Grant is statiscally behind AP but not by much. I don’t know if Clifton will play this game or not. When healthy he has owned mullet boy dating back to his KC days.
    Vikes are a .500 club outdoors. Yeah, I know one game was against Cleveland but they laid 20 points on you. We held them to three. Cleveland was the first game on your schedule and the weather was good.
    aside from sacks the Packers are a better defense without a doubt.
    Vikes have a win against us. That is indisputable. Pack wins and there in essentially a tie for the Norris.
    I don’t know what the heck will happen except it’s going to be a GREAT game and I don’t see the Vikes winning.

    NFC North is a two team race. Chicago is decimated at LB and Detroit is a non factor. Just the way I like it.

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 22414
    #812088

    Passing week 4

    Rogers = 2 TD’s 1 INT
    Favre = 3 TD’s 0 INT

    Score before Vikings went into “prevent” = 28-14….. if the Vikings have a weakness (have for years) it is playing to the level and maybe below the opponent the last quarter I cringe when I have to watch Brett watch it too… He is and always will be a warrior

    big G

Viewing 30 posts - 31 through 60 (of 253 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.