Quote:
Times have changed since the Constitution was written. That stuff is old and outdated and will likely have many changes in the future.
What you or other’s believe doesn’t make what I believe wrong or right or vice versa.
I have to leave for work so I’ll keep this short…but this argument is a classic example of the liberal “living breathing Constitution” argument. The left trots this argument out whenever they want to restrict free speech, ban guns, trample on private property, etc.
I am a strict constructionist, which means I believe that when the Constitution says “the right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed”, it actually means that the right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed. The left has attacked the Second Amendment for years on the “things change all the time” argument.
I personally don’t care much about gay marriage, and would support civil unions for same-sex partners. However, to make gay marriage a Constitutional issue you must first prove that marriage is a basic human right all individuals deserve. I don’t see how that point can be made. I believe marriage is a social tradition, not a basic human right, and so long as most people think it should be reserved for a man and a woman, that is how it should stay.