I agree Yo- Zuri. I am not saying that they don’t have the right to keep fish, if the DNR says it’s ok, who am I to judge.
I just wish the state of Wisc would get into the 2000’s and increase size limits to protect their state fish. Wisconsin historically has been the “Musky Capital”
of the world.
But with the DNR still having a 34″ limit on a majority of lakes and the catch and kill ratio still too high in my opinion, they are no longer the Musky Capital.
Just look at recent Muskie Inc release lists. The high majority of monster muskies are coming from Minnesota and Canada (obviously), and even states like Illinois (who by the way I believe has a 48″ limit on all lakes).
Unfortunately the Wisc DNR has fallen behind in their qwest for large muskies because of pressure from resort owners who think that people traveling to “their” lake should have the right to keep a fish.
Well, I will end it with this. The day a 34″ musky is a trophy, is the day a 1 lb largemouth is a trophy too.
I think the state of Wisc tourism is suffering from their lack of management for large fish. Heck, look at all the “big name” musky anglers from nothern Wisconsin.
You think they are filming their big fish shows in their home state?
The answer to that is … no.