Potential World Record Largemouth

  • Jeremiah Shaver
    La Crosse, WI
    Posts: 4941
    #431803

    Is the fish a World Record? IMO Unofficially YES, but there is too much red tape and question for this to become certified…

    nick
    Lakeville, MN
    Posts: 4977
    #431806

    Dude think of the size of the filets on that, I could eat that fish for a week solid and I really like bass.

    col._klink
    St Paul
    Posts: 2542
    #431818

    Eat a bass???

    YUCK!

    deeplake
    Iron, mn
    Posts: 247
    #431828

    yuck. nothing could make that fish taste good….

    farmboy1
    Mantorville, MN
    Posts: 3668
    #431829

    That is one huge fish. Too bad there was not a certified scale there, but I think the guy did the right thing by releasing it. He seemed very concerned about the health of the fish, and those genetics are now spawning

    shayla
    Posts: 1399
    #431850

    Quote:


    yuck. nothing could make that fish taste good….


    No, but the MILLION DOLLARS they have been promising to the next world record bass could sure buy a lot of walleye dinners!

    dank
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts: 1123
    #431861

    What a cow.

    My thoughts, if the scale checks out to be accurate the record should be his.

    A quote from Jaws, “That fish is 20, nope 25 (Pounds) feet.”

    chris-tuckner
    Hastings/Isle MN
    Posts: 12318
    #431865

    If they have a picture of the fish on the scale, all you need is a NIST standards block to verify what the scale actually is when it reads 25 pounds. You should be able to reverse certify it. (If you can prove the same scale was used to weigh the fish! ) Then the question is the foul hooking. Which I understand may net be a question. Like Slop said, it may be too much red tape.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.