Quote:
Go to Minnesota regulations and read them. It will set you straight. The same holds true for eather state license holder. That is why the boarder rules differ from the rest of the state. Here is the link scroll down to page 50 and read it. http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/rlp/regulations/fishing/fishing.pdf
Not so simple bassmaster. It really comes down to the state you reside in. If you buy a WI non-resident license but reside in MN, when in controversy you must still follow the restrictions enforced by your state of residency. Residency is the determing factor in this argument. You cannot tell me, a WI resident, with a resident license, to go pick up a MN book of regulations and follow those rules simply because it’s border water. Read the WI regs and it permits RESIDENT license holders 3 lines on all inland and border waters. This is what the WI book says about WI/MN boundary waters and this is what will protect me in MN court all day long.
“Wi residents need a WI fishing license and MN residents need a MN license to fish in these boundary waters. Residents of other states need a nonresisdent license from WI or MN. Regulations on these waters may differ between states. You must obey the regulations of the state in which you are fishing.”
How do I know which state I’m fishing in? First and foremost, I’m a WI resident so boundary or not, by definition of the law, I’m fishing in WI water. When does it become MN?
The “boundary water” concerning the Mississippi River is defined as the area between two sets of railroad tracks. ANY AREA between them, by definition of the law, is WI water when I’m the fisherman in question. There is no half.
It’s like this…… when the MN DNR tickets me, I’m going to walk up to the judge and show him these two things: One, if MN regs are required to fish with a WI resident license, the burden of proving this is upon him….. and it won’t happen. Two, the definition of border water is all water up to “stated structure”, which means my regulatory obligations are subject only to MY state of residence, which permits 3 lines. Until I’m in sole MN jurisdiction, this doesn’t change.
The confusion between DNR offices is because the MN DNR is for enforcing MN law, which for MN residents, is in fact 2 lines. They expect controversy because of the WI regs and are going to stick to MN regs every time. But in MN court, it won’t stand against a WI resident fishing his resident water. If you’re a WI resident, you’re entitled to WI provisions. If you’re a MN resident, you’re entitled to MN provisions. If you try to jump the border to gain a provison, you’ll be busted. If you try to practice resident law in non-resident water, you’re asking for trouble.
Briank……. about those other questions….. stick to residency to clear any confusion.