Climate Change Effects on Lake Minnetonka

  • mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #1404420

    Quote:


    My brain cell is tired.



    I think mine popped.

    desperado
    Posts: 3010
    #1404424

    Quote:


    Quote:


    My brain cell is tired.



    I think mine popped.


    uh oh, I hope it didn’t release any CO2

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #1404435

    Salamanders Disappearing Because of Global Warming

    Quote:


    The scientists haven’t yet confirmed that the salamanders’ smaller size is behind the documented population declines, though they are confident that climate change is what’s driving the shrinkage in body size.


    I swear no scientist can be objective in any natural science because they are predisposed to conclude everything is the result of global warming. And that is a REAL danger.

    ..last one

    nhamm
    Inactive
    Robbinsdale
    Posts: 7348
    #1404443

    Leading scientist from the prehistoric days.

    PB2
    Posts: 329
    #1404501

    Quote:


    Runoff is the biggest contributor to algae blooms. If anyone is concerned with algae, I suggest they focus on changing agricultural practices.


    Fallacy

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #1404506

    Quote:


    Quote:


    Runoff is the biggest contributor to algae blooms. If anyone is concerned with algae, I suggest they focus on changing agricultural practices.


    Fallacy


    So excess nutrients going into bodies of water has nothing or less to do with algae blooms than warmer water, longer warm water seasons?

    Is this where I bet $50 and ask for a linear regressive chart?

    belletaine
    Nevis, MN
    Posts: 5116
    #1404507

    Quote:


    Quote:


    Quote:


    Runoff is the biggest contributor to algae blooms. If anyone is concerned with algae, I suggest they focus on changing agricultural practices.


    Fallacy


    So excess nutrients going into bodies of water has nothing or less to do with algae blooms than warmer water, longer warm water seasons?

    Is this where I bet $50 and ask for a linear regressive chart?


    Yeah, I gotta think all the grass clippings soaked in Trugreens secret sauce has a bit of effect.

    WinnebagoViking
    Inactive
    Posts: 420
    #1404523

    How will you make good on the wager? Trend = 0.035 days earlier ice out per year, about 4.5 days earlier over the 124 years 1890-2013.

    desperado
    Posts: 3010
    #1404540

    a bag of organic fertilizer (produced by male domestic bovine) would probably be the most appropriate for any wager originated via a “debate” on an internet messge board

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #1404541

    Quote:


    How will you make good on the wager? Trend = 0.035 days earlier ice out per year, about 4.5 days earlier over the 124 years 1890-2013.


    And I quote

    Quote:


    Be sure to provide everything to back up whatever data you put forth.


    Where is the tabular data?

    Also, can you please include labels for the axis and legend, that’s a pretty sloppy chart. How can I trust someone who doesn’t even take the time to label his charts.

    belletaine
    Nevis, MN
    Posts: 5116
    #1404549

    Quote:


    Quote:


    How will you make good on the wager? Trend = 0.035 days earlier ice out per year, about 4.5 days earlier over the 124 years 1890-2013.


    And I quote

    Quote:


    Be sure to provide everything to back up whatever data you put forth.


    Where is the tabular data?

    Also, can you please include labels for the axis and legend, that’s a pretty sloppy chart. How can I trust someone who doesn’t even take the time to label his charts.


    Can this be continued at a Perkins with a live webcam?

    desperado
    Posts: 3010
    #1404554

    A Perkins ?
    How is that gonna determine anything ?
    Put ’em both in a feedlot, give ’em each a shovel, and whoever can pile the most cubic yards into a dumptruck in a day wins.

    desperado
    Posts: 3010
    #1404556

    and by the way, so does the water quality in the local lakes … because we can then use the results of this contest for local lawn enhancement (instead of TruGreen secret sauce)

    belletaine
    Nevis, MN
    Posts: 5116
    #1404558

    Brilliant! Get Don King on the phone!!

    biggill
    East Bethel, MN
    Posts: 11321
    #1404564

    Quote:


    How will you make good on the wager? Trend = 0.035 days earlier ice out per year, about 4.5 days earlier over the 124 years 1890-2013.


    Which data did you decide to leave out this time to prove your point?

    WinnebagoViking
    Inactive
    Posts: 420
    #1404565

    If you don’t like the way I presented the trend, do the calculations yourself. I never expected you would make good on the wager when presented with the evidence.

    DaveB
    Inver Grove Heights MN
    Posts: 4469
    #1404568

    Quote:


    How will you make good on the wager? Trend = 0.035 days earlier ice out per year, about 4.5 days earlier over the 124 years 1890-2013.


    I studied economics and accounting in school. All that graph tells us is that there is no identifiable trend. Using year to determine ice out dates has a very low probability of success.

    Yes, you can make a regression equation “fit” any data, but you have to acknowledge when the results are worthless.

    WinnebagoViking
    Inactive
    Posts: 420
    #1404569

    Quote:


    Quote:


    How will you make good on the wager? Trend = 0.035 days earlier ice out per year, about 4.5 days earlier over the 124 years 1890-2013.


    Which data did you decide to leave out this time to prove your point?


    Every year from 1890-2013 is included.

    WinnebagoViking
    Inactive
    Posts: 420
    #1404570

    Quote:


    Using year to determine ice out dates has a very low probability of success.


    Huh? Success of what?

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #1404573

    Send me the data to chart so I can compare it against the data originally presented like I originally requested. And for goodness sakes, put some damn labels up as I requested.

    This isn’t climate science where you can just show a chart and demand we take your word for it.

    belletaine
    Nevis, MN
    Posts: 5116
    #1404577

    Quote:


    If you don’t like the way I presented the trend, do the calculations yourself. I never expected you would make good on the wager when presented with the evidence.


    You are a very, very serious person.

    desperado
    Posts: 3010
    #1404587

    I tend to be much more of a Roebuck kinda guy myself

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #1404594

    ^^^ For those of us slow to the table…that was funny Don!

    Part of me wants to tell you guys to take it off line, but the other part of me likes watching train wrecks.

    Keep it above the belt and all is good.

    desperado
    Posts: 3010
    #1404604

    I’ll be here all week folks

    and now for a something completely different

    desperado
    Posts: 3010
    #1404608

    so if train A left St Anthony MN headed west bound at 70 mph and train B left Hutchinson MN headed east bound at 80 mph, on what day next year will the Lake Minnetonka ice out occur

    ^ I’ll cover Pug’s wager if anyone can accurately/adequately graph it (disclaimer: pmt will be in “FishBucks”)

    Brian Hoffies
    Land of 10,000 taxes, potholes & the politically correct.
    Posts: 6843
    #1404610

    April 14th at 11:30am.

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #1404612

    Hutchinson doesn’t have rails no longer Jack.

    desperado
    Posts: 3010
    #1404614

    Quote:


    April 14th at 11:30am.


    CLOSE; only off by 17 days

    blackbay
    Posts: 699
    #1404616

    I’d like to ask for the standard error, confidence intervals and R^2 to be included with these stats.

Viewing 30 posts - 61 through 90 (of 119 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.