Climate Change Effects on Lake Minnetonka

  • biggill
    East Bethel, MN
    Posts: 11321
    #1357704

    You be the judge:

    Lake Minnetonka Ice Out Records

    Minnetonka,27013300
    ice out date,source,comments
    1855-04-18,MNDNR-SCO,
    1855-04-18,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1857-05-05,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1857-05-05,MNDNR-SCO,
    1858-03-30,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1858-03-30,MNDNR-SCO,
    1859-05-04,MNDNR-SCO,
    1859-05-04,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1860-04-04,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1860-04-04,MNDNR-SCO,
    1863-04-15,MNDNR-SCO,
    1873-04-27,MNDNR-SCO,
    1877-04-14,MNDNR-SCO,
    1877-04-14,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1878-03-11,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1878-03-11,MNDNR-SCO,
    1887-04-14,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1887-04-14,MNDNR-SCO,
    1888-04-25,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1888-04-25,MNDNR-SCO,
    1889-04-01,MNDNR-SCO,
    1889-04-01,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1890-04-16,MNDNR-SCO,
    1890-04-16,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1891-04-21,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1891-04-21,MNDNR-SCO,
    1892-04-11,MNDNR-SCO,
    1892-04-11,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1893-04-28,MNDNR-SCO,
    1893-04-28,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1894-04-09,MNDNR-SCO,
    1894-04-09,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1895-04-05,MNDNR-SCO,
    1895-04-05,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1896-04-05,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1896-04-05,MNDNR-SCO,
    1897-04-18,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1897-04-18,MNDNR-SCO,
    1898-04-18,MNDNR-SCO,
    1898-04-18,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1899-04-24,MNDNR-SCO,
    1899-04-24,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1900-04-16,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1900-04-16,MNDNR-SCO,
    1901-04-23,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1901-04-23,MNDNR-SCO,
    1902-04-01,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1902-04-01,MNDNR-SCO,
    1903-04-13,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1903-04-13,MNDNR-SCO,
    1904-04-25,MNDNR-SCO,
    1904-04-25,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1905-04-02,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1905-04-02,MNDNR-SCO,
    1906-04-16,MNDNR-SCO,
    1906-04-16,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1907-04-08,MNDNR-SCO,
    1907-04-08,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1908-04-12,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1908-04-12,MNDNR-SCO,
    1909-04-26,MNDNR-SCO,
    1909-04-26,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1910-03-27,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1910-03-27,MNDNR-SCO,
    1911-04-01,MNDNR-SCO,
    1911-04-01,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1912-04-13,MNDNR-SCO,
    1912-04-13,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1913-04-18,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1913-04-18,MNDNR-SCO,
    1914-04-17,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1914-04-17,MNDNR-SCO,
    1915-04-17,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1915-04-17,MNDNR-SCO,
    1916-04-19,MNDNR-SCO,
    1916-04-19,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1917-04-18,MNDNR-SCO,
    1917-04-18,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1918-04-14,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1918-04-14,MNDNR-SCO,
    1919-04-06,MNDNR-SCO,
    1919-04-06,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1920-04-17,MNDNR-SCO,
    1920-04-17,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1921-04-03,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1921-04-03,MNDNR-SCO,
    1922-04-17,MNDNR-SCO,
    1922-04-17,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1923-04-23,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1923-04-23,MNDNR-SCO,
    1924-04-24,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1924-04-24,MNDNR-SCO,
    1925-04-07,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1925-04-07,MNDNR-SCO,
    1926-04-18,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1926-04-18,MNDNR-SCO,
    1927-04-12,MNDNR-SCO,
    1927-04-12,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1928-04-18,MNDNR-SCO,
    1928-04-18,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1929-04-07,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1929-04-07,MNDNR-SCO,
    1930-04-05,MNDNR-SCO,
    1930-04-05,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1931-04-06,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1931-04-06,MNDNR-SCO,
    1932-04-14,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1932-04-14,MNDNR-SCO,
    1933-04-18,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1933-04-18,MNDNR-SCO,
    1934-04-10,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1934-04-10,MNDNR-SCO,
    1935-04-07,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1935-04-07,MNDNR-SCO,
    1936-04-20,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1936-04-20,MNDNR-SCO,
    1937-04-19,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1937-04-19,MNDNR-SCO,
    1938-04-09,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1938-04-09,MNDNR-SCO,
    1939-04-17,MNDNR-SCO,
    1939-04-17,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1940-04-25,MNDNR-SCO,
    1940-04-25,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1941-04-14,MNDNR-SCO,
    1941-04-14,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1942-04-04,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1942-04-04,MNDNR-SCO,
    1943-04-12,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1943-04-12,MNDNR-SCO,
    1944-04-23,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1944-04-23,MNDNR-SCO,
    1945-03-30,MNDNR-SCO,
    1945-03-30,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1946-04-02,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1946-04-02,MNDNR-SCO,
    1947-04-19,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1947-04-19,MNDNR-SCO,
    1948-04-11,MNDNR-SCO,
    1948-04-11,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1949-04-13,MNDNR-SCO,
    1949-04-13,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1950-05-02,MNDNR-SCO,
    1950-05-02,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1951-04-28,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1951-04-28,MNDNR-SCO,
    1952-04-22,MNDNR-SCO,
    1952-04-22,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1953-04-08,MNDNR-SCO,
    1953-04-08,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1954-04-12,MNDNR-SCO,
    1954-04-12,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1955-04-12,MNDNR-SCO,
    1955-04-12,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1956-04-21,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1956-04-21,MNDNR-SCO,
    1957-04-20,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1957-04-20,MNDNR-SCO,
    1958-04-11,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1958-04-11,MNDNR-SCO,
    1959-04-10,MNDNR-SCO,
    1959-04-10,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1960-04-16,MNDNR-SCO,
    1960-04-16,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1961-04-14,MNDNR-SCO,
    1961-04-14,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1962-04-25,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1962-04-25,MNDNR-SCO,
    1963-04-10,MNDNR-SCO,
    1963-04-10,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1964-04-13,MNDNR-SCO,
    1964-04-13,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1965-05-01,MNDNR-SCO,
    1965-05-01,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1966-04-04,MNDNR-SCO,
    1966-04-04,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1967-04-09,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1967-04-09,MNDNR-SCO,
    1968-04-01,MNDNR-SCO,
    1968-04-01,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1969-04-17,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1969-04-17,MNDNR-SCO,
    1970-04-19,MNDNR-SCO,
    1970-04-19,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1971-04-17,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1971-04-17,MNDNR-SCO,
    1972-04-26,MNDNR-SCO,
    1972-04-26,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1973-04-04,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1973-04-04,MNDNR-SCO,
    1974-04-19,MNDNR-SCO,
    1974-04-19,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1975-04-28,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1975-04-28,MNDNR-SCO,
    1976-04-03,MNDNR-SCO,
    1976-04-03,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1977-04-10,MNDNR-SCO,
    1977-04-10,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1978-04-17,MNDNR-SCO,
    1978-04-17,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1979-04-23,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1979-04-23,MNDNR-SCO,
    1980-04-19,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1980-04-19,MNDNR-SCO,
    1981-03-27,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1981-03-27,MNDNR-SCO,
    1982-04-19,MNDNR-SCO,
    1982-04-19,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1983-04-22,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1983-04-22,MNDNR-SCO,
    1984-04-13,MNDNR-SCO,
    1984-04-13,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1985-04-13,MNDNR-SCO,
    1985-04-13,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1986-04-08,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1986-04-08,MNDNR-SCO,
    1987-03-21,MNDNR-SCO,
    1987-03-21,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1988-04-07,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Dick Gray
    1988-04-07,MNDNR-SCO,
    1989-04-17,MNDNR-LAKESDB,1989 date taken from climatology ice-out book summary page at front of book. RJH 10/25/90 – Climatology Ice-Out Book statistics
    1989-04-17,MNDNR-SCO,
    1990-04-04,MNDNR-LAKESDB,1990 date taken from climatology ice-out book summary page at front of book. RJH 10/25/90 – Climatology Ice-Out Book statistics
    1990-04-04,MNDNR-SCO,
    1991-04-08,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Climatology Ice-Out Book statistics
    1991-04-08,MNDNR-SCO,
    1992-04-09,MNDNR-SCO,
    1992-04-09,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Climatology Ice-Out Book statistics
    1993-04-19,MNDNR-SCO,
    1994-04-11,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Climatology Ice-Out Book statistics
    1994-04-11,MNDNR-SCO,
    1995-04-03,MNDNR-SCO,
    1995-04-03,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Climatology Ice-Out Book statistics
    1996-04-24,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Climatology Ice-Out Book statistics
    1996-04-24,MNDNR-SCO,
    1997-04-18,MNDNR-SCO,
    1997-04-18,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Climatology Ice-Out Book statistics
    1998-04-03,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Climatology Ice-Out Book statistics
    1998-04-03,MNDNR-SCO,
    1999-04-02,MNDNR-SCO,
    1999-04-02,MNDNR-LAKESDB,Climatology Ice-Out Book statistics
    1999-04-02,MNPCA,BB: Changed On to Off due to possible entry error
    2000-03-18,MNDNR-SCO,
    2001-04-19,MNDNR-SCO,
    2002-04-16,MNDNR-SCO,
    2003-04-12,MNDNR-SCO,
    2004-04-05,MNDNR-SCO,
    2005-04-09,MNDNR-SCO,
    2006-04-09,MNDNR-SCO,
    2007-04-03,MNDNR-SCO,
    2008-04-23,MNDNR-SCO,
    2009-04-13,MNDNR-SCO,
    2010-04-02,MNDNR-SCO,
    2011-04-14,MNDNR-SCO,Freshwater Foundation 5:14 AM Hennepin County Sheriff 6:00 AM
    2012-03-21,MNDNR-SCO,
    2013-05-02,MNDNR-SCO,Freshwater Society

    vikefanmn77
    Northfield,MN
    Posts: 1493
    #1403982

    I could be mistaken, but I see nothing at all.

    DaveB
    Inver Grove Heights MN
    Posts: 4469
    #1403989

    Quote:


    I could be mistaken, but I see nothing at all.


    Huh? From what I am seeing, the ice out dates are change nearly every year. This is all the proof I need that climate change is happening.

    Anyone who denies climate change just has to stay outside for 24 hours straight. It is colder at night and warmer during the day….can you honestly deny that?

    vikefanmn77
    Northfield,MN
    Posts: 1493
    #1403997

    Hold on…So, you’re saying that since the ice out date isn’t identical every year, that it’s somehow proof of climate change?? Sweet lord I hope I’m just missing your sarcasm.

    vikefanmn77
    Northfield,MN
    Posts: 1493
    #1403998

    Scratch that, coffee is still trying to get me started. I see what you did there!

    biggill
    East Bethel, MN
    Posts: 11321
    #1404000

    Who is this Dick Gray and how did he live so long?

    1855-1988

    DaveB
    Inver Grove Heights MN
    Posts: 4469
    #1404010

    Quote:


    Who is this Dick Gray and how did he live so long?

    1855-1988


    BK’s favorite adult film star

    Ben Putnam
    Saint Paul, MN
    Posts: 1001
    #1404011

    He drank the water in Minnetonka!
    On another note, it’s a pretty awesome chart showing no one direction trend… But I must disagree, it doesn’t Always get cooler at night.

    suzuki
    Woodbury, Mn
    Posts: 18621
    #1404016

    Quote:


    Who is this Dick Gray and how did he live so long?

    1855-1988


    WinnebagoViking
    Inactive
    Posts: 420
    #1404029

    Quote:


    He drank the water in Minnetonka!
    On another note, it’s a pretty awesome chart showing no one direction trend… But I must disagree, it doesn’t Always get cooler at night.


    So you’ve run a linear regression on the data? I’ll bet $50 there’s a trend.

    haasjj
    Cordova, IL
    Posts: 373
    #1404031

    I’m not seeing much there either.

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #1404034

    Quote:


    …it’s a pretty awesome chart showing no one direction trend…


    That’s because they conveniently left out pre ice age ice out dates.

    desperado
    Posts: 3010
    #1404044

    Quote:


    Who is this Dick Gray and how did he live so long?

    1855-1988


    It would certainly appear that he was one of those species who BENEFITED from the 19th/20th Century climate cycle

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #1404054

    I was trying to figure out when the Pool 2 water temp hit 50 degrees in the fall.

    I don’t recall the actual date I came up with but let’s say it was Oct 15th. In looking back at the dates, Oct 15 was never listed. In other words, the water temp never changed to 50 degrees on the average date.

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #1404110

    Quote:


    That’s because they conveniently left out pre ice age ice out dates.


    Come on. No ones going to bite? Throw me a bone here.

    suzuki
    Woodbury, Mn
    Posts: 18621
    #1404114

    Quote:


    Quote:


    That’s because they conveniently left out pre ice age ice out dates.


    Come on. No ones going to bite? Throw me a bone here.


    crickets

    biggill
    East Bethel, MN
    Posts: 11321
    #1404115

    I did a little math because I was curious.

    Average ice out by the decade:

    1850’s : 4/21
    1860’s : 4/9
    1870’s : 4/7
    1880’s : 4/13
    1890’s : 4/15
    1900’s : 4/14
    1910’s : 4/11
    1920’s : 4/14
    1930’s : 4/12
    1940’s : 4/12
    1950’s : 4/14
    1960’s : 4/14
    1970’s : 4/16
    1980’s : 4/10
    1990’s : 4/10
    2000’s : 4/10
    2010’s : 4/9

    Buzz
    Minneapolis MN
    Posts: 1814
    #1404118

    Glad to see some of you are looking at climate change, there is a free seminar coming up on Wednesday if any would like to attend. Seminar

    gixxer01
    Avon, MN
    Posts: 639
    #1404128

    Quote:


    I did a little math because I was curious.

    Average ice out by the decade:

    1850’s : 4/21
    1860’s : 4/9
    1870’s : 4/7
    1880’s : 4/13
    1890’s : 4/15
    1900’s : 4/14
    1910’s : 4/11
    1920’s : 4/14
    1930’s : 4/12
    1940’s : 4/12
    1950’s : 4/14
    1960’s : 4/14
    1970’s : 4/16
    1980’s : 4/10
    1990’s : 4/10
    2000’s : 4/10
    2010’s : 4/9


    Hard numbers and facts have no place here!

    Seriously, though, nice work!

    Ben Putnam
    Saint Paul, MN
    Posts: 1001
    #1404162

    Quote:


    Quote:


    He drank the water in Minnetonka!
    On another note, it’s a pretty awesome chart showing no one direction trend… But I must disagree, it doesn’t Always get cooler at night.


    So you’ve run a linear regression on the data? I’ll bet $50 there’s a trend.



    I wouldn’t doubt there’s a trend buddy, but from what I could see there isn’t a “one direction trend” as if ice out is consistently getting earlier due to a warming in the climate. The one trend I did see seems to follow the 11 year sun cycle quite well in a matter of generality.

    lhprop1
    Eagan
    Posts: 1899
    #1404254

    Quote:


    Quote:


    I did a little math because I was curious.

    Average ice out by the decade:

    1850’s : 4/21
    1860’s : 4/9
    1870’s : 4/7
    1880’s : 4/13
    1890’s : 4/15
    1900’s : 4/14
    1910’s : 4/11
    1920’s : 4/14
    1930’s : 4/12
    1940’s : 4/12
    1950’s : 4/14
    1960’s : 4/14
    1970’s : 4/16
    1980’s : 4/10
    1990’s : 4/10
    2000’s : 4/10
    2010’s : 4/9


    Hard numbers and facts have no place here!

    Seriously, though, nice work!


    Take out the highest and lowest one because they could be abnormalities.

    After that, everything is within a week. Over the course of 150+ years, that seems pretty consistent to me.

    Buzz
    Minneapolis MN
    Posts: 1814
    #1404258

    Ice out on Tonka is not the measure of climate change. You measure climate change in many ways, increased summer water temperatures, increased aquatic vegetation growing seasons and hundreds of other measures.Increasing air temperatures are causing water temperatures to rise, which impacts aquatic species as well as human health. Increased water temperature results in decreased dissolved oxygen and greater vulnerability of aquatic organisms to water pollution. Shifts of population of fish species from coldwater to warmwater species are expected to occur.

    Increased water temperatures also may contribute to the occurrence of harmful algal blooms, including potentially toxic algae, in lakes and waterways where people swim, fish, or engage in other recreational activities (some of this information is from a 2013 PCA report). If we (including myself) continue to burn fossil fuels, we will influence climate change toward warming.

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #1404281

    Runoff is the biggest contributor to algae blooms. If anyone is concerned with algae, I suggest they focus on changing agricultural practices.

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #1404290

    If we can’t count ice out dates, then can we not count glaciers and arctic ice?

    biggill
    East Bethel, MN
    Posts: 11321
    #1404294

    Quote:


    Shifts of population of fish species from coldwater to warmwater species are expected to occur.


    This is a great point but I found what could be an exception. Whitefish have recently returned to the fox river in Green Bay. Something they haven’t seen in decades. Cleaner water is believed to be a contributor but it seems that a cold water fish has returned to a historical spawning area.

    http://m.jsonline.com/more/news/wisconsin/a-century-later-whitefish-are-turning-up-in-wisconsin-rivers-b99148047z1-233569571.html

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #1404301

    Seems for every Ying, there’s a Yang.

    Buzz
    Minneapolis MN
    Posts: 1814
    #1404303

    The return of Whitefish is good news. The changes from climate will be minuet, it isn’t that climate change isn’t a natural cycle, it is. The question many have is how much are we contributing to it increasing and if there is anything we can do about it. Here is what MN is looking to do. PCA report

    WinnebagoViking
    Inactive
    Posts: 420
    #1404314

    Quote:


    Quote:


    I did a little math because I was curious.

    Average ice out by the decade:

    1850’s : 4/21
    1860’s : 4/9
    1870’s : 4/7
    1880’s : 4/13
    1890’s : 4/15
    1900’s : 4/14
    1910’s : 4/11
    1920’s : 4/14
    1930’s : 4/12
    1940’s : 4/12
    1950’s : 4/14
    1960’s : 4/14
    1970’s : 4/16
    1980’s : 4/10
    1990’s : 4/10
    2000’s : 4/10
    2010’s : 4/9


    Hard numbers and facts have no place here!

    Seriously, though, nice work!


    Really? How can you get a decadal average for the 1850s, 1860s, 1870s, and 1880s when you have less half a decade’s worth of data for each of those decades? 1850s, 4 years of data. 1860s, 2 years. 1870s, 3 years. 1880s, 3 years.

    Anyone reasonably competent in stats would start from the beginning of the continuous data. If we take your decadal averages starting with decades where we really have a decade’s worth of data (1890-present), there’s appears to be a pretty clear downward trend.

    1890’s : 4/15
    1900’s : 4/14
    1910’s : 4/11
    1920’s : 4/14
    1930’s : 4/12
    1940’s : 4/12
    1950’s : 4/14
    1960’s : 4/14
    1970’s : 4/16
    1980’s : 4/10
    1990’s : 4/10
    2000’s : 4/10
    2010’s : 4/9 (incomplete)

    But looking at the descriptive data actually tells us nothing. Again, anyone reasonably competent in stats, would run a regression of the continuous time series to identify whether actual trend exists (I’ll wager there is) and whether the trend is significant (perhaps. perhaps not).

    But as was pointed out above, even if there were a trend, the ice out dates on a particular lake are not indicative of climate change. Ice out is influenced by many factors not related to temperature (although in a large data set those factors would tend to offset and cancel each other out over time).

    Even if ice out were a good proxy for temperature change, one 14,500 acre lake says absolutely nothing about regional let alone hemispheric or global climate change.

    Ben Putnam
    Saint Paul, MN
    Posts: 1001
    #1404322

    I’m just glad that nothing on the chart indicates that we are in for consistent winters like this last one in a trend that will continue to get progressively colder/longer. Not that that isn’t a possibility, but it doesn’t look like the last 150 years of history show us that it is likely to occur.

    biggill
    East Bethel, MN
    Posts: 11321
    #1404336

    Quote:


    Really? How can you get a decadal average for the 1850s, 1860s, 1870s, and 1880s when you have less half a decade’s worth of data for each of those decades? 1850s, 4 years of data. 1860s, 2 years. 1870s, 3 years. 1880s, 3 years.


    Take the amount of data available, add it up and divide it by the number of entries. Pretty simple really.

    I don’t discount your point. It’s a great point and I agree. But you should also then take out the earliest and latest date as well to account for anomalies. It’ll look like this:

    1890’s : 4/15
    1900’s : 4/14
    1910’s : 4/11
    1920’s : 4/14
    1930’s : 4/12
    1940’s : 4/12
    1950’s : 4/14
    1960’s : 4/14
    1970’s :
    1980’s : 4/10
    1990’s : 4/10
    2000’s : 4/10
    2010’s : (incomplete)

    I’m ply posting what I had to work with.

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 119 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.