Saw this on Facebook. Apparently the lake has pike we 3 eyes too and there have been several caught.
February 7, 2014 at 5:42 am
#1356888
3 Eyed Walleye
-
February 7, 2014 at 5:56 am #1386632
I didn’t read the rest of the story Pug. Was there more then one photo of this wall-eyes?
There’s more credibility with several photos then one “possibly” photoshoped pic.
Just saying.
February 7, 2014 at 6:01 am #1386633Looks like the old ‘Snorks’ cartoon!
February 7, 2014 at 6:02 am #1386634Quote:
I didn’t read the rest of the story Pug. Was there more then one photo of this wall-eyes?
There’s more credibility with several photos then one “possibly” photoshoped pic.
Just saying.
come on BK…..its on the internet soooo it has to be true.
and can not beleive i am saying this. but pug is usually good about researching before posting stuff . and i did say usually
February 7, 2014 at 6:07 am #1386635Finally…a fish with side imaging.
February 7, 2014 at 6:13 am #1386639Quote:
Finally…a fish with side imaging.
FDR
February 7, 2014 at 6:17 am #1386640The cats nicknamed him Periscope.
February 7, 2014 at 6:37 am #1386648Don’t drink the water.
February 7, 2014 at 6:43 am #1386651Holy Hannah, it’s a real life Blinky!
February 7, 2014 at 6:51 am #1386657Quote:
I didn’t read the rest of the story Pug. Was there more then one photo of this wall-eyes?
There’s more credibility with several photos then one “possibly” photoshoped pic.
Just saying.
Your just bummed out there is not a third check to slice off on that fish.
February 7, 2014 at 6:55 am #1386658Thanks Will for posting the link.
The thought did cross my mind of it being Photoshopped, but I got a pretty good eye for that, if I say so myself. And it was an article on a newspaper site, which I think lended more credence to the story and photos.
Anyone know where this is from? I am guessing Thunder Bay, Ontario.
Never mind, I did some of that research I am famous for
and it is North Bay, Ontario.February 7, 2014 at 7:12 am #1386666Why are all 3 pictures basically of the same angle? none from behind looking back towards the head of the fish.
February 7, 2014 at 7:19 am #1386670Are any of these mutant fish kept and turned over to a university or something for testing?
February 7, 2014 at 7:33 am #1363576Quote:
Why are all 3 pictures basically of the same angle? none from behind looking back towards the head of the fish.
Uh, because the eye is not growing on it’s anus?
RobbinsdaleFebruary 7, 2014 at 7:33 am #1386673Real life Blinky……
February 7, 2014 at 10:42 am #1386762Its a good photoshop job. I used to do lots of photoshopping myself but that’s top of the line!
February 8, 2014 at 3:33 pm #1387037So you wouldn’t want to take pictures of the same thing from different angles to prove the validity, lol I got a $1 that I’ll sell you thats worth$100K then.
February 8, 2014 at 3:59 pm #1387039Quote:
So you wouldn’t want to take pictures of the same thing from different angles to prove the validity, lol I got a $1 that I’ll sell you thats worth$100K then.
I wouldn’t, because I don’t think it is a big deal. I could care less if people thought it was real or not.
They did take 3 pictures from different angles. It’s easy to fake one photo. Its another to fake 3 different angles of the same thing.
If they did photoshop it, it’s a spectacular job and I’m sending them a photo of me to see if they can make me handsome.
February 8, 2014 at 4:02 pm #1387042They don’t make that good of software yet Pug. Some day though.
February 8, 2014 at 4:04 pm #1387043Quote:
They don’t make that good of software yet Pug. Some day though.
And here I posted a nice comment flattering you on Facebook just seconds ago.
February 8, 2014 at 7:44 pm #1387093lol, I’d like to see a good picture from front, side, side, and rear. Like going to the gentleman’s club, might as well get a good look at it all!
Viewing 22 posts - 1 through 22 (of 22 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.