Hey guys… I also posted this in another forum… FYI
Basically this has gone through all the internal hurdles already and has been “christened” by the Bass Tech Committee. The only part we need to wait for is the legalese… Public comment period.
To address some of the concerns and part of the reason the proposal was even brought forth was due to the DNR’s sampling of bass by electrofishing over the years (mostly since 1993). We have ample data to evaluate whether bass populations are increasing or decreasing. We know that with some exceptions, recruitment (production of young to adulthood) is not a problem, in fact many lakes in central MN have too much recruitment! We have lakes that have abundant year classes of largemouth bass, rivers that have year class successes during low water (which is typical) and have yet to see major impacts from bass anglers or even incidental anglers due to the small amount of harvest that occurs.
Keep in mind that instant C&R has the least effect on the bedding fish (next to no angling at all), the harvest of bass is very low (most bass anglers C&R) and even other anglers claim less than 10% harvest. Currently people do use the excuse “I am fishing for crappie, walleye, pike, dogfish”… Name any other species and yet are catching bass. This also can simplify enforcement.
The current bass opener in many parts of the state makes those fish available to HARVEST and has been that way for a long, long time, yet we have increasing and expanding bass populations all across the state. So as a resource manager why wouldn’t one offer up additional angling opportunity??? Especially if we have data to suggest that there is limited potential impact to the resource?
In any case if some would like to discuss it further, I would be glad to take your questions. Please look up the contact info on the Little Falls Fisheries Home Page . I will do my best to answer questions/concerns.
Thanks.