Quote:
My question to you all…
Would you take a PED if you knew it would get you millions?
I’d like to say I would be above this, but the reality is, I’d probably take them. I was always afraid of roids growing up along with cocaine, heroin etc… I don’t know enough about the PEDs of today, but I assume they have a less detrimental affect on your body than roids did in the past?
I think the thing is that for athletes who are already performing at very high levels, the siren call of PEDs is that they will take you past a personal pleateau.
If you look at enduance athletes like speed skaters or nordic skiers, the are posting VO2-Max numbers that are off the charts and that puts them at the very edge of what their physology will support. In other words, improving performance to any signifcant degree may not be physically possible.
So I can see where some see PEDs and doping as the ONLY way they can get to the next level. So they start rationalizing…and then it’s a slippery slope.
The sad fact of the matter is that when I look at results for some endurance sports, it’s hard NOT to think that blood doping was playing a major role during certain periods where records were dropping left and right. It was well-known that blood doping improves performance long before there was a test for it. Since it’s your own blood, I can see where many athletes started thinking about it. And then they start wondering if they are the only ones NOT doing it…
Grouse