Tracker Pro Guide Reveiw

  • jake47
    WI
    Posts: 602
    #1282341

    Hey guys!….and ladies!

    I am considering a new boat and am looking at possibly getting a Tracker Pro Guide 16′ with a 50 hp Merc on it. I have been looking at 16′ footers cause I can still tow it with our Murano. I have been looking at the Trackers because we have a little addition to the family on the way and the Trackers appear to be a little more economical than say a Lund or Alumacraft.

    Do any of you have reviews of this boat or something similar? Positive or negative, all feedback will be appreciated.

    chubby
    Bloomington
    Posts: 244
    #1173072

    Lower price because they are lower quality. Most of the time you really do get what you pay for.

    live2fishmillelacs
    Blaine, MN
    Posts: 155
    #1173074

    I run a Tracker Pro Guide V-175. Mine is a 2012. I absolutely love it. Also the quality is awesome. I would recommend Tracker. Brand loyalty will be in play here. Just like trucks, if you love Chevrolet a Ford…well they are just not as good.

    Steve Plantz
    SE MN
    Posts: 12240
    #1173085

    Quote:


    Lower price because they are lower quality. Most of the time you really do get what you pay for.


    X2

    jake47
    WI
    Posts: 602
    #1173088

    Quote:


    Lower price because they are lower quality. Most of the time you really do get what you pay for.


    Do either of you (Chubby or Steve) have direct experience with this statement? Or is this just a generalization that is meant to say that “because it is cheaper, it is no good.”

    chubby
    Bloomington
    Posts: 244
    #1173089

    Most everyone loves their boat and I do not doubt that yours has been great for you. However when you compare Tracker to some of the other popular brands you will find that they use cheaper hardware and components and cheaper lower quality construction methods. Was not meant to be a knock on Tracker however they do build a product that is meant to hit certain price points and when you do that something has to be sacrificed

    gary d
    cordova,il
    Posts: 1125
    #1173093

    I have a Tracker 2002 Super Guide 16 V with a 40 HP. I also love my boat.It had every thing on it that I wanted at the time that I bought it.At the time it had a built in gas tank and enough storage, that was a big selling point for me. For the money it is a very good buy. You can away see what a new Tracker cost than take the money and go buy a new used boat if a name brand is big for you. Good luck on what ever you do!!!

    chubby
    Bloomington
    Posts: 244
    #1173096

    I have worked in the Marine industry for about 20 years and have sold the following aluminum boat brands Lowe, Lund, Alumacraft, Smokercraft, Sylvan, Harbercraft, Jetcraft, Klamath, Bayrunner, Crestliner, Northwoods, and probably a couple others that I have forgotten.

    After that long you can look at a boat, its construction methods, and components and tell what level of quality it is in a few short minutes. I have looked at many Trackers over the years so I am quite familiar with them. One thing that Tracker was notorious for doing (not sure if they still do)is using a butt weld where the transom and bottom joined. Very quick and cheap to do but very weak. If you hit a rock while underway it is almost always in the back quarter of the hull, if you have a butt welded joint it is very easy for the bottom to push upwards as you move over it until the rock reaches the transom where it then catches and tears the transom loose from the bottom. Lund and Alumacraft fold the bottom of the transom and attach on top of the bottom sheet. This will allow a rock, pipe, stump, etc to slide across the bottom without catching the transom. Much more expensive but much stronger and safer. Tracker opts for a much cheaper lower strength method of construction. That is just one way that Tracker uses cheaper construction methods to make a cheaper boat.

    Bundie
    Monticello, MN
    Posts: 79
    #1173091

    I have owned two trackers a Bass Tracker 175 and also a proguide 175. The only problem i have had with both of them it that they didn’t cost me an arm and a leg just to have a boat and go fishing.

    esoxrox
    Posts: 75
    #1173113

    I owned a 2005 tracker pro guide v 16 with a 50hp mercury for 4 years. I fished 4-6 days a week. Tackled mille lacs and leech and even an mtt event. They are solid built and handle big waves well. I now run a lund but if the budget doesn’t allow it id totally run a tracker again. Good luck in your decision making!

    jonb
    Fayette, Iowa
    Posts: 73
    #1173135

    I have owned a Tracker TV-18 for 12 years, great boat for the style of fishing I do. Boat is generally well made – have had no issues with it other that general use items that any boat would have. There are some things that could be improved, as with anything. I have been looking at new boats but have yet to find anything under $40K that is laid out as well or as fishable for me as my tracker – will be keeping it for a few more years. I have been especially impressed with the trailer – it is very well built and very easy to load on. Previously I had a Tracker TV-17 which had about the poorest trailer that could be made – significant upgrade with the TV-18. I haven’t looked much at the new ones to see if the quality has remained. I would not be a bit afraid of a new Tracker.

    biggill
    East Bethel, MN
    Posts: 11321
    #1173136

    I can tell you I won’t buy another aluminum boat unless its a hardcore river boat. And I still own my Crestliner. Glass for me next time.

    Oh, and you do get what you pay for. As long as you look very close at what you are buying. It usually take one boat purchase to figure that out though.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.