Any reports from GC hearings at the Capitol?

  • jon_jordan
    St. Paul, Mn
    Posts: 10908
    #1149149

    Latest from the capitol.

    ST. PAUL, Minn. – A clear majority of the Minnesota House is backing a new plan that would modestly revise the state’s gun laws, while scuttling much-talked about universal background checks.

    Rep. Debra Hilstrom, a Brooklyn Center Democrat, unveiled on Wednesday a bill with 73 cosponsors from both parties. Her bill would tighten the state’s current background check system, add to the parameters of who cannot legally own a gun and help county attorneys crack down on illegal gun owners.

    It won’t impose universal background checks for gun purchases.

    Hilstrom says her bill is the Legislature’s best bet at passing some laws to prevent some gun violence while still respecting Minnesotans’ right to own guns.

    Hennepin County Sheriff Rich Stanek and other members of the Minnesota Sheriff’s Association announced their support for Hillstrom’s bill. Stanek cited the bill’s call for improved and more timely data sharing as essential for keeping guns out of the hands of dangerous and mentally ill people.

    “A background check is only as good as the data that is put into the system and we need complete, timely information about people who are ineligible to possess a firearm,” said Sheriff Stanek during a press conference at the State Capitol. “When a court deems a person mentally ill and dangerous to oneself and others, that person should not have access to a gun.”

    Advocates for tighter control say that Minnesotans overwhelmingly support expanding background checks, and that Hilstrom’s bill ultimately won’t have much of an impact on gun violence.

    (Copyright 2013 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

    lhprop1
    Eagan
    Posts: 1899
    #1149162

    Quote:


    Hilstrom says her bill is the Legislature’s best bet at passing some laws to prevent some gun violence while still respecting Minnesotans’ right to own guns.

    Advocates for tighter control say that Minnesotans overwhelmingly support expanding background checks, and that Hilstrom’s bill ultimately won’t have much of an impact on gun violence.


    So now, they’re just passing bills for the sake of saying that they passed a bill. How about enforcing the other 2,000 some odd other firearm laws that already exist?

    Buncha no-good busy bodies.

    AllenW
    Mpls, MN
    Posts: 2895
    #1149163

    Quote:


    Quote:


    Hilstrom says her bill is the Legislature’s best bet at passing some laws to prevent some gun violence while still respecting Minnesotans’ right to own guns.

    Advocates for tighter control say that Minnesotans overwhelmingly support expanding background checks, and that Hilstrom’s bill ultimately won’t have much of an impact on gun violence.


    So now, they’re just passing bills for the sake of saying that they passed a bill. How about enforcing the other 2,000 some odd other firearm laws that already exist?

    Buncha no-good busy bodies.


    All about getting votes.
    Criminals will still be criminals.

    al

    jon_jordan
    St. Paul, Mn
    Posts: 10908
    #1149177

    Quote:


    Quote:


    Hilstrom says her bill is the Legislature’s best bet at passing some laws to prevent some gun violence while still respecting Minnesotans’ right to own guns.

    Advocates for tighter control say that Minnesotans overwhelmingly support expanding background checks, and that Hilstrom’s bill ultimately won’t have much of an impact on gun violence.


    So now, they’re just passing bills for the sake of saying that they passed a bill. How about enforcing the other 2,000 some odd other firearm laws that already exist?

    Buncha no-good busy bodies.


    My thought exactly.

    -J.

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #1149180

    You nay sayers!

    These people are working (hard) to make your world a safer place and you go and call them names.

    lhprop1
    Eagan
    Posts: 1899
    #1149185

    Quote:


    You nay sayers!

    These people are working (hard) to make your world a safer place and you go and call them names.


    You callin’ me a nay sayer? That’s not nice.

    The free nay that I say paves the way for a happy day. Be careful or you may rue the day that you have to pay for the nay that I say. Got it B-Kay?

    I bet that confused everyone from Iow-A.

    suzuki
    Woodbury, Mn
    Posts: 18704
    #1149191

    “Minnesotans overwhelmingly support expanding background checks”

    And they know this for a fact how??????
    I dont support it because it will be the kindling for universal databases.

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #1149218

    Stribe poll Mike. 70% of MN supports more background checks.

    kooty
    Keymaster
    1 hour 15 mins to the Pond
    Posts: 18101
    #1149491

    Man, have you tried reading this bill. I’ve tried a few times talk about painful.

Viewing 9 posts - 91 through 99 (of 99 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.