Great Perspective on the Gun Debate

Jon Stewart Show

Love the parts about hammers, muskets, and surface to air anythings….

Good statement at the end too!

Dealing with “Guns”, there are many sides to the fence, do ya’ think??

http://www.hulu.com/#!watch/443266

http://www.hulu.com/#!watch/443675

There are some relative point of views if you look through the comedy, I think. Then there are issues to take on what is not stated clearly.

Give the tubes a serious look, then give your point of view input,,

Not sure if i’m walking into the hornets nest,but I’ll reply I see the need for changes in the laws, the bottom line is the right to bear arms is set forth in the second ammendment. I have no problem with tougher backround checks, waiting periods, etc: what I have a problem with is somone telling me my fundemental rights, that I fought for and my friends died for no longer exist. The Costitution isnt a joke or a peice of paper to be taken lightly,It is what this country was built upon, sorry if this offends some people but it is what I believe.

Quote:

---

I have no problem with tougher backround checks, waiting periods

---

So would I if it would have changed the out come of just one of the mass shooting since Columbine.

We will need to be respectful of others opinions.

I think BK said it all and is what is missing these days ‘
}
RESPECT OTHERS OPINIONS AND PERSPECTIVES

Dog

Quote:

---

Dealing with “Guns”, there are many sides to the fence, do ya’ think??

CHECK YOUR PMS

http://www.hulu.com/#!watch/443266

http://www.hulu.com/#!watch/443675

There are some relative point of views if you look through the comedy, I think. Then there are issues to take on what is not stated clearly.

Give the tubes a serious look, then give your point of view input,,

---

THANK YOU BCK–ABOUT TIME SOMEONE REMINDED THE IDIOTS IN WASHINGTON WHAT THIS UNION IS ALL ABOUT–SNAGGED

Jon Stewart can kiss my #$%.

Wonder what “Ted” has to say about all of this?

Quote:

---

Jon Stewart can kiss my #$%.

---

And after yours, mine!

Why does any vehicle manufacturer make vehicles that can go faster than 70 MPH and sell them in MN ? Some of his analogies are way off…. for example, McDonalds hot coffee, can I sue McDonalds as being responsible, because somebody poured hot coffee over my head ? Definitely plenty to the left and right… I am stuck in the middle…AGAIN. Try to take my guns from me and you got a fight… try to take my AR15 & high capacity mags…. well, I guess I don’t have any of them He didn’t have much to say about LaPieres comments about good guy with a gun, stopping a bad guy with a gun… I am also betting that a principal I know, could shoot a AR15 wielding crazy with a bullet proof vest.. right in the head…

Well stated!

Be nice to John Stewart. Living in a bubble isn’t easy.

There is some interesting irony in the description:

Quote:

---

Gun rights activists’ paranoid fear of a possible dystopic future prevents America from addressing its actual dystopic present.

---

Thanks for your comments BCK as I also believe this is a constitutional issue. But rather than citing 2A, I’ll stand behind the preamble,

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Notice there is no asterisk at the end pointing to a footnote that says, “Except for issues that could be interpreted to infringe upon the 2nd amendment”.

After the words “insure domestic tranquility” there is no parentheses stating (as defined by the NRA).

We have a problem in this country that is affecting our way of life and we need to solve it. The 2nd amendment was not established to stand in the way of it.

ET

He’s anti 2A in my opinion. Enemy.