Some people just understand things better.
IDO » Forums » Fishing Forums » General Discussion Forum » WY way for dealing with Obama gun assault
WY way for dealing with Obama gun assault
-
January 10, 2013 at 11:54 pm #1129203
States disregard federal drug laws couldn’t states do the same thing with gun laws? The federal government spends billions trying to stop drugs coming in and some states just ignore that fact.
blackbayPosts: 699January 11, 2013 at 12:12 am #1129212WY, one of my favorite places on earth! This Bill is true and not a hoax. I went on the WY gov’t site and the HB0104 is “Introduced”
My first time hunting in WY and we were out on ATV’s. I couldn’t find anything in their regs regarding gun case requirements, so I asked a CO. He about died laughing when he replied “Your in Wyoming, we don’t have stupid gun laws here”
January 11, 2013 at 12:19 am #1129216Quote:
States disregard federal drug laws couldn’t states do the same thing with gun laws? The federal government spends billions trying to stop drugs coming in and some states just ignore that fact.
This is true but federal agents can come into states like California and bust legal dealers, for breaking federal laws even though it’s legal in their state. Just read an article over Christmas on this. The states cannot do anything about it but the Feds are not doing this very often but they have and I’m thinking they could possibly do the same in a gun ban scenario.
January 11, 2013 at 2:54 am #1129251love it when people do something rather than whining or chuckling and forgetting about it.
January 11, 2013 at 1:57 pm #1129362Quote:
love it when people do something rather than whining or chuckling and forgetting about it.
What are we supposed to do?! I wrote all my reps including that puke franken. I dont know anybody in national media which is driving everything.
January 11, 2013 at 2:02 pm #1129323Quote:
Quote:
love it when people do something rather than whining or chuckling and forgetting about it.
What are we supposed to do?! I wrote all my reps including that puke franken. I dont know anybody in national media which is driving everything.
Media isn’t the only one. Do you think the firearms and ammunition manufactures has any interest in getting you boys whipped into a “ban” frenzy?
January 11, 2013 at 2:05 pm #1129372True but that would be short sighted if things start getting banned and taxed out of existence. But then again most big companies are more interested in instant gratification than the long haul.
January 11, 2013 at 2:12 pm #1129380Also don’t forget the NRA.
They have sold thousands of memberships during this latest round of panic. Everything they typically do they do behind closed doors and via newsletters and e-mails to membership. They now are on TV every chance they get telling how they will stand-up and defeat any attempts at any sort of ban. BTW, I’m not passing judgement on them, I’m just stating there are far more people and organizations interested in keeping the flames fanned then just the media.
Follow the money.
January 11, 2013 at 2:15 pm #1129386CC classes are being booked like mad now too. I saw report yesterday along the lines of more CC training in January than all of 2011? Can’t recall the details. Either way, an armed society is a good society.
January 11, 2013 at 2:21 pm #1129395That is an ugly side of the equation no doubt. Just as long as they dont impose any wierd restrictions I will be happy. We survived a mag ban before so we know that is doable though I still dont like it.
January 11, 2013 at 2:23 pm #1129396Quote:
CC classes are being booked like mad now too. I saw report yesterday along the lines of more CC training in January than all of 2011? Can’t recall the details. Either way, an armed society is a good society.
Agreed. Either nobody has them, which is impossible, or a lot of the good guys have them which will keep the bad guys in check. And according to our master set of rules (Constitution) bad guys can mean a tyranical government.
January 11, 2013 at 2:28 pm #1129405I clicked on MSNBC this morning to see Joe Scarburough talking with a glum face about people making millions of dollars off the death of 24 innocent children. He then said, listen to me, they are not coming for your guns. He didn’t mention how his network made $$$ off the tragedy or that in fact his very statement was exploitation.
January 11, 2013 at 2:37 pm #1129417Of course it was exploitation. That’s all this counrty does anymore. One area the constitution does not have a solution for.
desperadoPosts: 3010January 11, 2013 at 2:48 pm #1129422Quote:
This is true but federal agents can come into states like California and bust legal dealers, for breaking federal laws even though it’s legal in their state. The states cannot do anything about it; but the Feds are not doing this very often, but they have, and I’m thinking they could possibly do the same in a gun ban scenario.
The States can’t do anything about it?
I would submit that no state has yet made a sufficient effort to do anything about it.
Although I do suspect that if Wyoming were pushed hard enough on this one, they’d push back more than most other states would (or have).desperadoPosts: 3010January 11, 2013 at 2:54 pm #1129423Sooooo
Does anyone else find it quite ironic that the Feds want their drug and gun laws enforced by the states, but don’t want to be bothered by AZ when it comes to enforcement of immigration laws
(insert “puking” icon here)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.