Vikings/Packers Playoff

  • mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    January 1, 2013 at 5:19 pm #1125819

    I didn’t know people take it so literally. I’ll refrain until the first time I hear the Vikings referred to anything other than the Vikings.

    Mudshark
    LaCrosse WI
    Posts: 2973
    January 1, 2013 at 5:33 pm #1125824

    I always use Vikings……
    A vulgar term is just that…no working around it..

    Exactly how do you answer your son or daughter or grandchildren when they ask “what is a fudgepacker”?

    Just say’in Pug….

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    January 1, 2013 at 6:17 pm #1125840

    I know you don’t.

    Simple. People at the fudge factory that box up the treats for shipment to the sweet shops.

    But that’s neither here nor there. I’ll stop.

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 22454
    January 1, 2013 at 6:41 pm #1125845

    Quote:

    the packers have not got dominted by any means. The packers have more yards, points, first downs, and time of possesion in the first 2 games. Turnovers are also equal. but yeah youre right, they have sure dominated the pack…?

    Oh and congrats, daunte culpepper led the viks to a win in lambeau 7-8 years ago.. youre right, that has a lot to do with saturdays game!

    So we never forget…4Ever

    Mudshark
    LaCrosse WI
    Posts: 2973
    January 1, 2013 at 6:49 pm #1125847

    Thanks Pug….

    Willy Wonka
    Forest Lake, Mn.
    Posts: 161
    January 1, 2013 at 6:58 pm #1125853

    Gee, I never have taken the time to read the football threads. Pretty entertaining. Thanks!

    WS

    mike_leclaire
    Grand Rapids, MN
    Posts: 412
    January 2, 2013 at 1:54 pm #1126058

    Quote:

    Let’s see. You barely win at home, the Queens secondary is beat up and the Packers get Cobb and Woodson back. I like the Packers chances in Lambeau. No doubt Petersen is a beast but Rodgers a whiner? Totally disagree. All he wanted was the slow a$$ refs to do was spot the ball faster and he was mad a McCarty for throwing the challenge flag. Pack by at least 10.

    This is the second thread where you insuate the Vikings barely win at home. Last time I checked I think they only have 1 or 2 losses at home this year. And since years past are ancient in regards to this season those stats don’t mean squat. Take your cheese head off and Packers jersey off for a moment and reality check the Packers aren’t the best team in the NFL right now either.

    jeff_huberty
    Inactive
    Posts: 4941
    January 2, 2013 at 8:05 pm #1126190

    Quote:

    the packers have not got dominted by any means. The packers have more yards, points, first downs, and time of possesion in the first 2 games. Turnovers are also equal. but yeah youre right, they have sure dominated the pack…?

    Oh and congrats, daunte culpepper led the viks to a win in lambeau 7-8 years ago.. youre right, that has a lot to do with saturdays game!

    I here we are going to break out our Kick()
    offense for this game.

    jld
    Holmen
    Posts: 813
    January 2, 2013 at 11:30 pm #1126250

    They barely won this LAST game. Sorry I didn’t qualify my statement better. Where did I say all home games. I guess I missed the part where I said the Packers are the best team. If they win Sat. I would rather play Atlanta than SF, they are a bad matchup for GB. You seem to be reading a lot into my posts.

Viewing 9 posts - 31 through 39 (of 39 total)
1 2

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.