Boy is Rodgers a CRYER

  • jld
    Holmen
    Posts: 813
    January 1, 2013 at 7:52 pm #1125872

    Why is this whole review hard for you to understand. The review was already initiated and then McCarty threw the flag. Had he thrown the flag BEFORE the review was started the Queens would have gotten the ball with a Packer penalty. Pretty simple to understand. The rule wasn’t changed in the middle of game. Not sure it can be explained any simpler but I will try if need be.

    josh a
    Posts: 588
    January 1, 2013 at 10:57 pm #1125909

    Why do the Packer fans on this site let the Vikings fans get them so worked up they have to resort to name calling? I think when you let a post about football get you so bent out of shape that you start calling strangers on the internet names it may be time to stay offline for a while. We fully understand that our team may lose this weekend. On the other hand, Packer fans think that the Vikings are no match and might as well not show up. Don’t you all realize that Peterson has over 400 yards in 2 games agianst you? Even an idiot/moron Vikings fan knows that in the NFL teams don’t win a lot when they give up 200 yard games on the ground.

    targaman
    Inactive
    Wilton, WI
    Posts: 2759
    January 1, 2013 at 11:21 pm #1125915

    So after all that it’s ok to call yourself a moron?

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 23065
    January 1, 2013 at 11:54 pm #1125936

    Quote:

    Why is this whole review hard for you to understand. The review was already initiated and then McCarty threw the flag. Had he thrown the flag BEFORE the review was started the Queens would have gotten the ball with a Packer penalty. Pretty simple to understand. The rule wasn’t changed in the middle of game. Not sure it can be explained any simpler but I will try if need be.

    Show me in the rule, where a coach can throw a challenge “after the review is initiated” and then avoid the rule that says no review and the 15 yard penalty ? There is no verbage about the review “being initiated”…That is something that the Ref made up & you swallowed whole, do some reading on the subject and come back smarter

    desperado
    Posts: 3010
    January 2, 2013 at 12:22 am #1125953

    When did Vince McMahon become the NFL commissioner ?

    mike_leclaire
    Grand Rapids, MN
    Posts: 412
    January 2, 2013 at 1:45 pm #1126054

    Big G, I get what your are saying but you might as well give up trying to explain it any clearer. Anyone that comes on to a site and starts calling fellow fishing/hunting enthusiasts names isn’t going to listen to any reason you give to him. In is own little world he is right and the Packers are a Perfect 16-0 and have already won this years Super Bowl and have been super bowl champs for 4 years running. There is no point in bantering with someone like that.

    targaman
    Inactive
    Wilton, WI
    Posts: 2759
    January 2, 2013 at 2:33 pm #1126083

    The Packers are the Champions of the Universe, just deal with it.

    jeff_huberty
    Inactive
    Posts: 4941
    January 2, 2013 at 3:22 pm #1126093

    Quote:

    The Packers are the Champions of the Universe, just deal with it.

    Star QB: to STAR COMMAND; Come in STAR COMMAND!

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 23065
    January 2, 2013 at 3:34 pm #1126097

    The Vikings are the best thing to come along since……. wait for it…….. Sliced Cheese !!!

    chomps
    Sioux City IA
    Posts: 3974
    January 2, 2013 at 4:03 pm #1126108

    come on guys let’s stay on what the original poster posted. I want to hear more idiots chime in about this who didn’t watch the game.

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    January 2, 2013 at 5:20 pm #1126133

    Quote:

    come on guys let’s stay on what the original poster posted. I want to hear more idiots chime in about this who didn’t watch the game.


    You are right. I would be embarrassed if my 29 year old kid hopped around in a hissy fit on the sideline showing up his coach.

    Packers by 2013.

    jeff_huberty
    Inactive
    Posts: 4941
    January 2, 2013 at 5:24 pm #1126134

    Will the Packers fire McCarthy after losing two games in a row to the Vikings?

    vikefanmn77
    Northfield,MN
    Posts: 1493
    January 2, 2013 at 5:28 pm #1126137

    Quote:

    Will the Packers fire McCarthy after losing two games in a row to the Vikings?

    Sure hope not!!!

    jld
    Holmen
    Posts: 813
    January 2, 2013 at 9:43 pm #1126227

    So the head referee for the game made that whole thing up? The official NFL rule book says it is a 15 yard penalty for intiating a challenge when they aren’t allowed to, which the Packers were charged with(pages89-90). There is nothing in the rules about not being able to review a play if the challenge flag is thrown before or after the official initiates the review process; so I am not sure where that comes from to begin with. Either way, I am done with this thread.

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 23065
    January 3, 2013 at 12:03 am #1126259

    Quote:

    So the head referee for the game made that whole thing up? The official NFL rule book says it is a 15 yard penalty for intiating a challenge when they aren’t allowed to, which the Packers were charged with(pages89-90). There is nothing in the rules about not being able to review a play if the challenge flag is thrown before or after the official initiates the review process; so I am not sure where that comes from to begin with. Either way, I am done with this thread.

    Let me put this in as simple terms as I can….

    If you would read the rules on page 89-90, you would know, if a team “commits a foul” (IE throwing a challenge flag when it is not challengeable by a coach) they lose the review and get a 15 yard penalty. The rule is in place for the following scenarios… if the Vikings can get a snap off, before the ref stops for a review, the play would stand as called… or if the other team “commits a foul” to slow down play and cause a snap not to happen, (allowing more time for the booth ref to review & call down to the field to review) then they get “no review” play stands as called “and get a 15 yard penalty” it is written in English for all to read. This may be a dumb rule, but until it is re-written, it will only apply to everyone but the Packers evidently

    nowhere does it say, if the review is initiated first, then you can throw a flag and only get a 15 yard penalty… Carey made that up and it is speculated, that the rule change in 2013 will incorporate that part… which he probably read somewhere already & applied in the 2012 season

    chomps
    Sioux City IA
    Posts: 3974
    January 3, 2013 at 1:32 am #1126300

    G I like the endurance of your fingers! cause my lips got tired just reading that

    tbrooks11
    Posts: 605
    January 3, 2013 at 1:41 am #1126303

    I love how mplspug comes on here, talks a toooon of crap.. then deletes his comments like a little wus

    STEVES
    New Richmond, Wi
    Posts: 724
    January 3, 2013 at 2:24 am #1126318

    Quote:

    I love how mplspug comes on here, talks a toooon of crap.. then deletes his comments like a little wus

    Post Deleted Because I’m a Wus…

    STEVES
    New Richmond, Wi
    Posts: 724
    January 3, 2013 at 2:26 am #1126319

    Sorry, Little Wus

    targaman
    Inactive
    Wilton, WI
    Posts: 2759
    January 3, 2013 at 2:33 am #1126323

    targaman
    Inactive
    Wilton, WI
    Posts: 2759
    January 3, 2013 at 2:34 am #1126324

    Quote:

    Quote:

    come on guys let’s stay on what the original poster posted. I want to hear more idiots chime in about this who didn’t watch the game.


    You are right. I would be embarrassed if my 29 year old kid hopped around in a hissy fit on the sideline showing up his coach.

    Packers by 2013.

    targaman
    Inactive
    Wilton, WI
    Posts: 2759
    January 3, 2013 at 2:36 am #1126326

    …..

    targaman
    Inactive
    Wilton, WI
    Posts: 2759
    January 3, 2013 at 2:36 am #1126327

    Quote:

    …..

    DaveB
    Inver Grove Heights MN
    Posts: 4563
    January 3, 2013 at 3:12 am #1126336

    Maybe we can simply agree that lady Packer fans are fat and ugly and move on.

    Post deleted by your fat momma

    jeff_huberty
    Inactive
    Posts: 4941
    January 3, 2013 at 10:55 am #1126363

    Quote:

    Maybe we can simply agree that lady Packer fans are fat and ugly and move on.

    Post deleted by your fat momma

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    January 3, 2013 at 11:50 am #1126367

    Quote:

    I love how mplspug comes on here, talks a toooon of crap.. then deletes his comments like a little wus


    I didn’t delete anything cupcake. Go take a nap.

    Packers by 555

    targaman
    Inactive
    Wilton, WI
    Posts: 2759
    January 3, 2013 at 12:10 pm #1126369

    Quote:

    Quote:

    I love how mplspug comes on here, talks a toooon of crap.. then deletes his comments like a little wus


    I didn’t delete anything cupcake. Go take a nap.

    Packers by 555

    Can I be a cupcake too pug?

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    January 3, 2013 at 12:32 pm #1126375

    Quote:

    Can I be a cupcake too pug?


    You don’t want to know what I cal you

    jeff_huberty
    Inactive
    Posts: 4941
    January 3, 2013 at 12:34 pm #1126376

    Quote:

    Quote:

    Can I be a cupcake too pug?


    You don’t want to know what I cal you

    Buttercup

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 23065
    January 3, 2013 at 12:38 pm #1126378

    no crap, I had to write it about 6 times, so I could even understand what I was sayin’……

    really doesn’t matter now, saturday night this will all be over, for one half of us anyways and we can go back to fishing and drinking beer… (wait, were we suppose to quit ?? )

Viewing 30 posts - 91 through 120 (of 155 total)
1 2 3 4 5 6

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.