isnt it illegal to shoot wolves?

  • mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #1009843

    Quote:


    Quote:


    we could actually use a few more predators in the Twin Cities to help keep the prolific “urban” deer herd in check

    But can you imagine the uproar if a wolf or cougar showed up; even in one of the metro area’s so called Nature Centers?

    Hell every time a yearling black bear gets pushed out of its mother’s territory and wanders into an outer-ring burb, the soccer moms freak out and the sherriffs to have kill the thing.


    CAN I GET AN AMEN!! NOT IN OUR BACKYARD!! But here is what you guys should do up there….. AND YES horses probably taste as good as Moose or beef cattle. Don’t worry they’d be more interested in the newborn. Those don’t count right??



    As long as there are horses to ride.

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #1009845

    Quote:


    Quote:


    Oh my God pictures? That proves absolutely everything you said is 100% correct! I think I see a porch dog in its mouth.


    Actually my information is generated from the International Wolf Center. How about yours?? Pics were simply upon your request.



    My information? I don’t think I have said anything that has required sources. If you need some for anything I said, reply and I’ll try and help you out.

    desperado
    Posts: 3010
    #1009847

    Quote:


    As long as there are horses to ride.


    No worries, there’d still be horses left to ride; FASTER horses.

    dan stien
    Waunakee, Wisconsin
    Posts: 400
    #1009848

    Chris I think you have done a pretty good job of bringing alot of factual info to the forum. In my original post I am and still am against the illegal shooting of the Wolves but I do beleive they are a problem that needs to be resolved, not just in Minnesota but other states also like my state Wisconsin. I am not comparing numbers of wolves just the issue. I am a wildlife ecology student at UW Madison and you are right the wolf population will increase until there is not enough food to support them and deer are paying the big price. What is not being mentioned here or considered by others from what I have been reading is the other species that will suffer also. This does not just affect deer, other predators rely on deer for food also and their numbers will be reduced or they will focus on another prey type reducing those nunbers also. This has a huge affect on the whole ecosystem. I do not know who all the players are who are making the rules for these wolves but I would have to say they do not live in the area of wolves or understand the total implications of there brillance ( sarcasm). I was amazed to see the numbers of wolves estimated to be in Northern Minnesota, I say estimate because that is all it is. Biologist admit they only see a portion of indiviuals and definetly miss alot more than they see so they use a modeling formula to estimate. It gives a general idea but what I saw missing was a range for error in the estimates, is it a few hundred, a thousand? that is important information also to be considered. As for man managing wildlife and screwing it up, yes we do, it is a constant learning process but man has been managing wildlife for as long as we have been around, even the revered original life style of the indians managed wildlife. Plus with our population growth and spread into areas of wildlife’s home ranges we have forced managment. Even though some of us do not mind to see a bear, wolf, or the elusive mtn lion walk through our property others do and we have to take that into consideration also. The major mistake that was made with the wolves was that there was no clear concise plan as to what will happen once they reach a population that becomes determental to the whole ecosystem, livestock and personal property like pets etc. I do believe there should be a open season for wolves, make them valuable and give people a feeling like they have some say and control. That would change alot of perspectives on the wolf and would bring populations of wolves down. I believe it has to be looked at as a whole system also, not just state by state. I believe with the numbers of wolves in Minnesota they are supplying wolves to other states so maybe by controlling wolves populations in Minnesota will effect populations in other states also. I am not saying I have the answers but the ones making the decisions should be listening to those who live it and know it personally because when it comes down to it they are the ones that know the land and animals better than us who do not live there and have a personal relationship with the ecosystem. Also listen to the experts, I have talked with some DNR personell here in Wisconsin and they have some ideas and plans ready to go but there hands are tied by the federal government. They have to be careful in what they say because they also recieve grants for projects from the federal government, so a case like don’t bite the hand tat feeds you. I do not envy the position the local DNR’s are in, it has to be tough.
    I am still against the illegal shooting because it makes me think what else are they shooting because they disagree with the laws, but things regarding the wolves need to change. Thanks for all the info Chris it got me looking for more on this subject and thinking about all the implications invovled.

    arklite881south
    Posts: 5660
    #1009853

    Apparently somehow I misinterpreted your statement somehow was suggesting my findings are not representative of factual information. I assure you this topic needs no fabrication from me or anyone else. It is quite common for those opposing wolf management to become quite emotional. A “Wolf Crush” is hard to break. The issues are simply black and white and true clarity is always best seen that way. If guys want to look into this there will be clarity I promise. If guys want to argue we can simply spin our wheels like our government has taught us, and then we scoff at online. So again if you are against managing wolves I clearly invite your factual information supporting your viewpoints. No personal attacks just the facts please. Resolution comes from intelligent sources sticking to factual information and designing a well thought out solution for the best of all concerned. Right now I think DEER and MOOSE aren’t fairly represented.

    “Oh my God pictures? That proves absolutely everything you said is 100% correct! I think I see a porch dog in its mouth. “

    arklite881south
    Posts: 5660
    #1009861

    Quote:


    Chris I think you have done a pretty good job of bringing alot of factual info to the forum. In my original post I am and still am against the illegal shooting of the Wolves but I do beleive they are a problem that needs to be resolved, not just in Minnesota but other states also like my state Wisconsin. I am not comparing numbers of wolves just the issue. I am a wildlife ecology student at UW Madison and you are right the wolf population will increase until there is not enough food to support them and deer are paying the big price. What is not being mentioned here or considered by others from what I have been reading is the other species that will suffer also. This does not just affect deer, other predators rely on deer for food also and their numbers will be reduced or they will focus on another prey type reducing those nunbers also. This has a huge affect on the whole ecosystem. I do not know who all the players are who are making the rules for these wolves but I would have to say they do not live in the area of wolves or understand the total implications of there brillance ( sarcasm). I was amazed to see the numbers of wolves estimated to be in Northern Minnesota, I say estimate because that is all it is. Biologist admit they only see a portion of indiviuals and definetly miss alot more than they see so they use a modeling formula to estimate. It gives a general idea but what I saw missing was a range for error in the estimates, is it a few hundred, a thousand? that is important information also to be considered. As for man managing wildlife and screwing it up, yes we do, it is a constant learning process but man has been managing wildlife for as long as we have been around, even the revered original life style of the indians managed wildlife. Plus with our population growth and spread into areas of wildlife’s home ranges we have forced managment. Even though some of us do not mind to see a bear, wolf, or the elusive mtn lion walk through our property others do and we have to take that into consideration also. The major mistake that was made with the wolves was that there was no clear concise plan as to what will happen once they reach a population that becomes determental to the whole ecosystem, livestock and personal property like pets etc. I do believe there should be a open season for wolves, make them valuable and give people a feeling like they have some say and control. That would change alot of perspectives on the wolf and would bring populations of wolves down. I believe it has to be looked at as a whole system also, not just state by state. I believe with the numbers of wolves in Minnesota they are supplying wolves to other states so maybe by controlling wolves populations in Minnesota will effect populations in other states also. I am not saying I have the answers but the ones making the decisions should be listening to those who live it and know it personally because when it comes down to it they are the ones that know the land and animals better than us who do not live there and have a personal relationship with the ecosystem. Also listen to the experts, I have talked with some DNR personell here in Wisconsin and they have some ideas and plans ready to go but there hands are tied by the federal government. They have to be careful in what they say because they also recieve grants for projects from the federal government, so a case like don’t bite the hand tat feeds you. I do not envy the position the local DNR’s are in, it has to be tough.
    I am still against the illegal shooting because it makes me think what else are they shooting because they disagree with the laws, but things regarding the wolves need to change. Thanks for all the info Chris it got me looking for more on this subject and thinking about all the implications invovled.


    THANK YOU!! Finhunter. I believe what is happening is representative of pure injustice. I also happen to be guilty of being passionate in things I believe in. Still I do a lot of reasearch before formulating an opinion. I like opinions to be backed by facts. It is frankly quite refreshing from a person of your knowledge to draw similiar conclusions. I of course do know about the fed $$ that can potentially corrupt viewpoints. I hesitate to bring it up a I want to keep things clean if possible. Most still don’t think wolves roam the wolf range. I assure you there is more $$ that corrupst minds as well as you likely know also.

    You are SPOT on that WI will look to Minnesota when wolves raid that herd. I’ll be hunting in Ashland here soon. I promise you the discussions around camps and coffee shops revolve around wolves and sometimes deer. This is an issue that is growing rapidly. It is a problem that has already decimated deer, and it a true reactive form will cause some sort of resolution far too late. Still deer need a solution quickly as do the other animals in the eco system. Again thank you for taking the time to express yourself and your knowledge. Many will sit on their hands and let me hang on the cross. I’m getting pretty good at it, but I’m getting sore.

    dave-barber
    St Francis, MN
    Posts: 2100
    #1009871

    Quote:


    As long as there are horses to ride.


    Uhm… Wolves are known for taking down horses too. It really isn’t that unsual.

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #1009875

    Quote:


    Apparently somehow I misinterpreted your statement somehow was suggesting my findings are not representative of factual information. I assure you this topic needs no fabrication from me or anyone else.



    I don’t think I ever disputed factual information. I probably had a few counter points to their interpretation.

    Quote:


    It is quite common for those opposing wolf management to become quite emotional. A “Wolf Crush” is hard to break. The issues are simply black and white and true clarity is always best seen that way. If guys want to look into this there will be clarity I promise.



    I would submit this thread as proof there is also emotion for those championing management. Emotion is not a disqualification.

    Quote:


    So again if you are against managing wolves I clearly invite your factual information supporting your viewpoints. No personal attacks just the facts please. Resolution comes from intelligent sources sticking to factual information and designing a well thought out solution for the best of all concerned. Right now I think DEER and MOOSE aren’t fairly represented.



    I never stated I was against management, in-fact I stated the opposite. And hHow are the deer and moose not being represented? I thought tags were handed out based on population in a zone, whether those deer populations were affected by hunters, wolves or pick up trucks.

    If this is going to require intelligent sources, it should have never started on a fishing message board.

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #1009876

    Quote:


    Quote:


    As long as there are horses to ride.


    Uhm… Wolves are known for taking down horses too. It really isn’t that unsual.



    That was my response to Chris saying wolves would eat foal.

    arklite881south
    Posts: 5660
    #1009890

    Calm Pug….

    Deer and Moose are the main animals being decimated by wolves thus many fear they are not being represented well. I’m sorry this seemingly remains foggy for you. Many feel allowing a big game population currently under statewide management in Zone 100 to become further decimated is questionable management.

    As far as your poke towards individuals on a “Fishing Message Board” lacking intelligence to discuss anything but fishing?? I’m sorry you feel that way, and again I’ll probably have to disagree with you here.

    If you care to dig through my posts here on this topic and point out what is incorrect I’ll gladly take the time to look through your concerns.

    Brian Hoffies
    Land of 10,000 taxes, potholes & the politically correct.
    Posts: 6843
    #1009829

    There, the thread made it to 100 posts.

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 22604
    #1009909

    Cant’ you shoot a “dog” that is chasing deer in MN ?

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #1009921

    Quote:


    As far as your poke towards individuals on a “Fishing Message Board” lacking intelligence to discuss anything but fishing?? I’m sorry you feel that way, and again I’ll probably have to disagree with you here.




    Me calm? It was a poke indeed, as in poking fun. If I were serious I would be ripping myself and that would not be very intellectual.

    I guess I don’t get it. I believe by your numbers hunters still take more deer every year, so by that logic, man must be decimating the deer as well. If you hunt, then you cannot represent them because it would be a conflict of interest.

    Anyway, with 100 posts I win a bet and it is time to collect my money. Brian, pay up!

    Keith Fischer
    Posts: 116
    #1009934

    Quote:


    But won’t the Wolves eating the Deer lower my auto insurance? I mean I would rather run over a Wolf then a Deer.


    I can tell you from experience an adult Timber will do just
    as much damage as a deer. My wife has hit both and the wolf
    damage cost more to repair than the deer.

    arklite881south
    Posts: 5660
    #1009943

    I’m glad this has been fun for you Pug. I’m glad you’ve gained some sort of entertainment value while the issue at hand is far more important to others. I will admit I have always thought it was strange while select few individuals will go to great lengths to play the devils advocate with seemingly no agenda. Maybe it is a micro version of today’s political arena. Fight with no real solution ever coming to light. Some will try to provide the factual evidence in hopes we might use this to formulate a solution while others in reality simply find it a big joke. I’ve exhausted my efforts in trying to reason with you pug. I simply will have to disagree with you. In retrospect I should have stopped chatter with you after you referenced how you could care less how many deer are eaten by a wolf or shot by man. I’m sure you will retract further statements or twist the meaning in some fashion. Still I believe we have different intentions when it comes to the discussions on this thread. My hopes were furthered education for those supporting a cause many find in trouble. A wildlife ecology major has agreed nearly 100% with my findings. Maybe BK will agree with you. Again I believe we are able to discuss a wide variety of topics here on IDO. Still if a thread becomes personal where the initial topic takes a backseat there is no place for it anymore.

    In closing I’ll leave this thread expressing my viewpoints. Man manages wildlife. Whether you like this or not is not the point. To build the population of a predator with no end goal is irresponsible. By doing this you will decimate animals such as deer and moose here in Minnesota. Elk in other regions were decimated as well. Those states regained control of the Gray wolf. Still this was terrible reactive management that had already did the damage. We are dangerously close to that here in Northern Minnesota where the largest US pack of wolves is growing. I believe we’ve got a big issue on our hand, and it is proven through this thread we’ve got interesting competition while trying to formulate a solution. Even those who seemingly don’t care want to fight and debate it.

    Still for those who honestly do care about what will happen on this current road of Wolves vs. Big game I hope you’ll invest the time and effort to further understand the complexities of this issue. I hope you contact Minnesota leaders and share your concerns. We obviously face an uphill battle.

    Even coming from a “Deer Hunter” which apparently means I can’t help formulate an effective plan……Minnesota we’ve got a problem. BTW I fish and also support slot restritions and managing fisheries………I know call me crazy. Worse than that Pug…….I EAT FISH.

    BTW since this thread started yesterday; At an estimated 60,000 deer eaten by wolves a year you might want to do the math to figure how many deer have been “WHATS FOR DINNER” at the WOLF RESIDENCE on the back forty.

    jeff_huberty
    Inactive
    Posts: 4941
    #1009944

    C’mon Guys

    Deer? Elk? Moose? Buffalo? Puppies?

    Now if Grandma was missing;..well then that would enough of that!

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #1010008

    Quote:


    I’m glad this has been fun for you Pug. I’m glad you’ve gained some sort of entertainment value while the issue at hand is far more important to others. I will admit I have always thought it was strange while select few individuals will go to great lengths to play the devils advocate with seemingly no agenda. Maybe it is a micro version of today’s political arena. Fight with no real solution ever coming to light. Some will try to provide the factual evidence in hopes we might use this to formulate a solution while others in reality simply find it a big joke. I’ve exhausted my efforts in trying to reason with you pug. I simply will have to disagree with you. In retrospect I should have stopped chatter with you after you referenced how you could care less how many deer are eaten by a wolf or shot by man. I’m sure you will retract further statements or twist the meaning in some fashion. Still I believe we have different intentions when it comes to the discussions on this thread. My hopes were furthered education for those supporting a cause many find in trouble. A wildlife ecology major has agreed nearly 100% with my findings. Maybe BK will agree with you. Again I believe we are able to discuss a wide variety of topics here on IDO. Still if a thread becomes personal where the initial topic takes a backseat there is no place for it anymore.

    In closing I’ll leave this thread expressing my viewpoints. Man manages wildlife. Whether you like this or not is not the point. To build the population of a predator with no end goal is irresponsible. By doing this you will decimate animals such as deer and moose here in Minnesota. Elk in other regions were decimated as well. Those states regained control of the Gray wolf. Still this was terrible reactive management that had already did the damage. We are dangerously close to that here in Northern Minnesota where the largest US pack of wolves is growing. I believe we’ve got a big issue on our hand, and it is proven through this thread we’ve got interesting competition while trying to formulate a solution. Even those who seemingly don’t care want to fight and debate it.

    Still for those who honestly do care about what will happen on this current road of Wolves vs. Big game I hope you’ll invest the time and effort to further understand the complexities of this issue. I hope you contact Minnesota leaders and share your concerns. We obviously face an uphill battle.

    Even coming from a “Deer Hunter” which apparently means I can’t help formulate an effective plan……Minnesota we’ve got a problem. BTW I fish and also support slot restritions and managing fisheries………I know call me crazy. Worse than that Pug…….I EAT FISH.

    BTW since this thread started yesterday; At an estimated 60,000 deer eaten by wolves a year you might want to do the math to figure how many deer have been “WHATS FOR DINNER” at the WOLF RESIDENCE on the back forty.




    Don’t hurt your shoulder.

    Some play devil’s advocate to try and offer a different point of view. Sometimes it works with open minds.

    You haven’t reasoned with me. You’ve tried to sway me. I haven’t found one attempt to see the other side on your part. I have seen people called tree huggers and wolf lovers though.

    Crazy? I encourage people to keep fish. Not only do I support selective harvest, I encourage it for the benefit of the ecology.

    Now if you want to try and turn that statement no me and apply it to wolves, well go back and I have agreed that if they need to be managed they should be. However, I haven’t read much to support that they need to be other than that they kill lots of deer and moose. Maybe I missed something. If I did, I apologize.

    I do realize that because of man wildlife needs to be managed, because there will be no natural balance when man is involved. However deer, moose and fish have not been decimated to near extinction.

    Do wolves need to be managed now? I don’t know. If the powers that be said they do, then I am all for it. But because I don’t know, doesn’t automatically mean that they should be at this point.

    Let us not forget, the reason they almost became extinct is because some people thought that they knew better. That they’d be better off if all wolves were dead. So forgive my cynicism.

    arklite881south
    Posts: 5660
    #1010038

    MERCY. I’ve lost my interest in being politically correct. No place for this here anymore.

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 22604
    #1010044

    Why do people think it is not “natural” for humans to harvest deer ? Are we not carnivores ? The fact we have “seasons” kind of contradicts “natural” for humans ??? Good thing we have vehicles hitting them year round Chris, I enjoyed reading your posts and learned alot. Because I don’t have wolves runnin’ through my yard everyday, doesn’t mean I can’t understand where you are, they may be thriving beyond numbers the herd and area can handle. I hope it is proactive management, rather than after the damage is done…

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #1010068

    *Post Deleted by Mplspug Due to Boredom*

    Just would like to say, sincerely, good luck Chris. If wolves need to be managed up there, I hope you get it done.

    I should also say that Brian was not involved in my posting in anyway. Not sure where he’s been today, but I was expecting to find a PM from him in my PM box.

    1hl&sinker
    On the St.Croix
    Posts: 2501
    #1010079

    Quote:


    Oh my God pictures? That proves absolutely everything you said is 100% correct! I think I see a porch dog in its mouth.


    Thanks pug now I have to clean my monitor off from spitting diet coke all over it. I think I see a porch dog in its mouth

    reverend
    Rhinelander, WI
    Posts: 1117
    #1010140


    Sounds good!! Let’s not stop with wolves though. Let’s build elk herds to years past and mow down industry so the buffalo can roam freely…..YOUR BACKYARD. I’ll research past numbers to estimate space that will be needed from Richfield. Might want to move the swingset kids.


    Careful with that one Chris…if we start talking about “managing” ALL wildlife to numbers in years past, building up elk and bison(not to mention cougars and wolverines), we’d also have to knock the snot out of the existing deer numbers. Depending on “years past” definitions, (1800?, 1900?, 1950-1975?) that is…pretty much anytime before 1960 or so and you’re talking half or less the deer numbers we see today. Won’t speak for moose #’s, haven’t spent time tracking the history there.
    Again-Yes, if their poulation is up and sustainable, manage them. We don’t need a wolf “browse line” the same way you see when deer overpopulate.
    Again-NO, do not shoot them(or anything else) illegally if you presume to call yourself a sportsman who claims to care about his wild places or his pasttime.

    Also, FOR SURE I’d really like to meet many of you IDO’ers in person one of these days-it’s only on this site have I seen this many people take such fundamental differences and still respect each other enough to keep it civil. This thread is the abortion/[censored] marriage topic of the hunting/fishing world, and they haven’t had to delete it yet. Point: A hell of a lot of good people here, people willing to help a guy out, willing to argue without hating, people willing to SHARE information, tips and tactics.
    Thank you IDO’ers!
    -Rev

    reverend
    Rhinelander, WI
    Posts: 1117
    #1010144

    “This thread is the abortion/[censored] marriage topic of the hunting/fishing world…”

    What the??? We can’t say “[censored] marriage” on here?

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 60002
    #1010147

    Most sites have an auto censor function. Certain word that “excite” people are automatically censored.

    I just work here.

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 60002
    #1010149

    Quote:


    and they haven’t had to delete it yet.


    Kind of ironic huh?

    arklite881south
    Posts: 5660
    #1010180

    Yes. Many of us personally censor ourselves. Disagreements between IDO members will not alter the bigger picture. Every man has a tipping point, and when he reaches his limits a deep breath needs to take place before henpecking. Again there are fundamental differences in opinion here. Everyone is entitled to an opinon. I simply feel we are currently in a reactive style of management in regards to wolves. Protecting or reintroducing a species with no end game or sustainable number is considered irresponsible by most every ecology major in the world. Don’t need to believe me as I’m just a fisherman and hunter. I believe the numbers will continue to support my theory. I also believe the number will be acted upon in a reactive style like in Idaho and Montana. For those who care to know reality look it up. We’re all capable of the search. See how the Elk Herd did in Yellowstone. See how it was perceived and then what they did to correct the problem after decimation.

    BTW reintroduction of BISON?? Kind of tongue in cheek if you didn’t catch that.

    reverend
    Rhinelander, WI
    Posts: 1117
    #1010201

    Chris-fundamentally I’m agreeing with you.

    Quote:


    BTW reintroduction of BISON?? Kind of tongue in cheek if you didn’t catch that.


    The bison comment went over my head, enlighten me? I don’t always listen to what I’m saying…at least according to my wife.

Viewing 30 posts - 91 through 120 (of 132 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.