MN Fish, Hunt Regulation Changes Are Coming

  • Brad Juaire
    Maple Grove, MN
    Posts: 6100
    #1273130

    Interesting arcticle that was recently featured in the Star Tribune.

    Fish, hunt regulation changes are coming

    Fish, hunt regulation changes are coming
    Article by: Star Tribune
    Updated: July 19, 2011 – 8:49 PM

    Non-profit conservation groups such as Ducks Unlimited could have crucial projects put on hold if the state government shutdown is a lengthy stoppage.

    The number of Minnesota lakes with special northern pike fishing restrictions will be capped at 100, a spearing ban on Cass Lake will be lifted and major changes are coming for duck hunters under a wide-ranging game and fish bill approved Tuesday night during a special session of the Legislature.

    Gov. Mark Dayton is expected to sign it into law as part of a compromise spending bill approved by legislative leaders and the governor.

    It caps the number of lakes with special northern regulations at 100 — 19 fewer than now, but 10 more than had been approved by legislators in a game and fish bill Dayton vetoed in May.

    The DNR imposes the size restrictions, often with approval of lake associations and fishing groups, to try to boost the average size of fish in those lakes. Spearers say the restrictions prevent them from using those lakes.

    The bill also lifts the spearing ban on Cass Lake and prevents the DNR from imposing any spearing restrictions on northerns there — an idea Dayton and the DNR opposed.

    The latest bill includes no ATV restrictions, as did the earlier bill, which Dayton cited when he vetoed it. However, it contains numerous provisions affecting hunters, which also had been in the earlier bill. Among them:

    • Removes a requirement that Minnesota’s waterfowl season begins the Saturday nearest Oct. 1. That means the DNR could open this year’s season on Sept. 24.

    • Removes the 9 a.m. duck opener restriction, meaning hunting may start a half-hour before sunrise.

    • Retains controversial antler-point restrictions for deer hunters in southeastern Minnesota for two more years but then requires legislative approval for any future antler-point restrictions.

    • Removes the 16-foot height restriction for deer stands.

    • Makes it illegal for a parent or guardian to knowingly allow a minor to hunt in violation of game and fish laws.

    • Gives a motorist who hits and kills a deer on a road the first right to the carcass.

    • Allows counties and towns to offer bounties on coyotes.

    • Mandates that money raised by the $5 state walleye stamp be used only to stock walleyes bought from the private sector.

    Doug Smith • [email protected]

    mfreeman451
    Posts: 543
    #982507

    very happy about the 9am rule going away for duck hunting..

    suzuki
    Woodbury, Mn
    Posts: 19056
    #982509

    I like several of them very much.

    dfresh
    Fridley, MN
    Posts: 3053
    #982511

    Quote:


    • Mandates that money raised by the $5 state walleye stamp be used only to stock walleyes bought from the private sector.


    This is pretty huge, isn’t it?

    rangerski
    North Metro
    Posts: 539
    #982542

    Nothing wrong with these amendments! Pass em imo!

    Alex Anderson
    Member
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts: 104
    #982592

    “Gives a motorist who hits and kills a deer on a road the first right to the carcass.”

    Do I need a license for this? lol

    quigley257
    Duluth, MN
    Posts: 3
    #982645

    I never did see the point of opening duck hunting at 9am. They are smart birds… it will be a quick learning curve.

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 23065
    #982737

    Oh boy…. how high am I gonna go with my new Taj Mahal permanent deerstand

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #982746

    Quote:


    “Gives a motorist who hits and kills a deer on a road the first right to the carcass.”

    Do I need a license for this? lol



    Don’t you have to pay the DNR when they investigate it? I don’t think it is much, but I know my brother paid for one someone else drilled.

    I am wondering why they needed that clarification though. Are there a lot of people fighting over the carcasses?

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 60014
    #982755

    Quote:


    “Gives a motorist who hits and kills a deer on a road the first right to the carcass.”

    Do I need a license for this? lol


    Anyone have a car that goes at least 50 mph for less than $100. for sale?

    I don’t have to hit them very hard do I?

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #982760

    BK, it would be easier buying a tag and giving it to someone to shoot one for you. You get more meat that way. Generally, ruptured spleen juice and meat don’t mix.

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 23065
    #982766

    I am almost certain, if someone hit a massive buck… it could get some people wound up about it. It’s mine.. no it’s mine and then finally the DNR saying.. nope it’s ours

    deertracker
    Posts: 9339
    #982775

    Quote:


    Quote:


    “Gives a motorist who hits and kills a deer on a road the first right to the carcass.”

    Do I need a license for this? lol



    Don’t you have to pay the DNR when they investigate it? I don’t think it is much, but I know my brother paid for one someone else drilled.

    I am wondering why they needed that clarification though. Are there a lot of people fighting over the carcasses?


    Not sure what you mean by investigate. It has always been my practice and everyone else I know to give the deer ffirst to the person that hit it. If that driver doesn’t take it most counties have road kill lists. You are given a free possession tag on scene. I would bet that Deputies give out tags 10:1 compares to CO’s as they are the ones at the accident.
    DT

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #982954

    Investigate was a poor choice of words. Arrive on the seen would have been a better phrase. Aren’t you suppose to call the DNR or something if you hit a deer. I am admittedly ignorant on the matter since I have yet to hit one (knock, knock) and have no inclination to take one off the road.

    deertracker
    Posts: 9339
    #983091

    You only need to call if you want the deer or an accident report. You don’t need to report property damage accidents if your vehicle was the only one damaged and car vs. deer are obvious to insurance agents. Possession tags are free however you can’t remove the deer without it.

    deertracker
    Posts: 9339
    #983093

    And there is no fee for them to show up.

    On a side note do you think people would notice if I cut out the back straps before someone came to pick it up.
    DT

    deertracker
    Posts: 9339
    #983095

    On a side note do you think people would notice if I cut out the back straps before someone came to pick it up.
    DT

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 17 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.