Comparing to Lake Magnor……….there are effects on not throwing the eaters back. If the population is high, food competition will definitely slow the rate of growth but doesn’t necessarily indicate stunted genetics. A stunted crappie can still reach 1.5 lbs! But, my experience on Magnor was a good fish population but all the fish over 9″ weren’t being put back. That REALLY reduces the number of quality fish. The numbers that survive to grow bigger are few and the majority just come into size and hit the frying pan. On Magnor, guys started accepting smaller fish and just taking more of them! Bad answer………………
I was listening to a conversation just last night and heard of some guys up north that found a hot bite, got their friends involved, and for 4 days straight, they all caught their limits! No fish released in the eater size! The bite cooled off but the people are still pounding this little 33 acre lake!!!! I just walked away. They’re meat hunters but staying within their legal right. From the numbers I understood, 4 days combined with a total of 14 limits, a limit being 25 combined pannies……….that’s 350 fish being taken out of a mere 33 acre water!!! There’s no way anyone can tell me this won’t effect the overall size and quality of the fishery!
The only reason they can access this lake now is because the beavers built a dam and the level came up enough to reach the road. Now people can access it without trespassing. But if the beavers don’t make a big enough problem, the conditions will stay accessible and I wonder how long a fishery will sustain that kind of pressure and harvesting?
Sorry for the vent guys………..but this kind of stuff is not conservation and it gets me heated up………especially when guys like the one’s being referenced complain about some lake that “just doesn’t produce like it used to”.
If numbers really are the problem, keep some of the little ones and pickle them! It’ll help thin the school and begin improving the quality of the individual fish size.