Hummingbird 997c SI – Review

  • jason-cyboron
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts: 487
    #1235757

    As promised I thought I’d do a little write up on what I thought of the Hummingbirds.

    As a past Lowrance user I’d have to say I was very impressed with the unit. The most attractable feature is the side imaging. After using it about a month I wouldn’t want to be without it.

    Installation was quite easy. I already had a ram mount for my Lowrance and the 997 fit right in. The lockable knobs even worked. I was surprised that the gps puck even used the same holes as the Lowrance. It is almost like this unit was made to replace Lowrance. Anyway, the installation was very easy. I had the perfect spot on the back of my Skeeter to mount the transducer to. The Hummingbird had a single power source to wire up and after that it was just connecting the cables. It doesn’t get any simpler than that.

    One of the things I was worried about was the menu on the Hummingbirds. The more I use the unit the easier it gets to navigate through the different screens. It’s almost second nature as it was navigating the menus of the Lowrance. Everything is pretty self explanatory with the menu screens. Those of you not wanting to get one of these units because of the learning curve on the menu screens have noting to worry about.

    I spent a whole week with the unit at a Bassmaster Central Open on Lake Amistad. The first image is of a bridge I captured. I really didn’t have anything special to do the dial in the side imaging. I get perfect images on either side of the boat. Depending on the situation you can look either the right or left sides or both. You can adjust how far you want to scan. The closer you look the sharper the images are. Depending on the speed you are trolling you can adjust the screen speed to get the sharpest image. While trolling if you come across a brush pile or other point of interest you can move the cursor and it pauses the screen and you can place the cursor on the brush pile place a waypoint on the that spot. The first image is of a submerged bridge I found on Laka Amistad. The image isn’t as clear as it could be, but pretty good for as rough as it was. The second image is of a creek channel on Amistad. You can clearly see the channel and hydrilla growing around it along with some brush.

    In the third photo I went out to a local lake and found a rock pile near a dam. I marked the gps point and trolled right up to it. I threw a finesse worm on the pile and it wasn’t long before I caught the bass in the last photo.

    I’m sure I have a lot to learn with this unit, but from what I do know I am impressed. From the start it has been easy to set up and use. There is a lot more to it than the side imaging and videos you can record. I was impressed with the Navionics Platinum Card, but the features on the platinum card is a whole other review. If anyone is interested in a new Hummingbird for yourself, I’m sure Wade at JollyAnn Marine would be happy to set you up.

    Jason



    t-ellis
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts: 1316
    #614707

    Good report, thanks for sharing. Keep us guys on the fence in on future reports and thoughts of the unit. I’m thinking a change over to a Humminbird myself.

    wade_kuehl
    Northwest Iowa
    Posts: 6166
    #614726

    Jason, Great review! I’m really glad to hear you’re enjoying your new Humminbird. I’m a Lowrance user too, but the more I hear good reviews from customers like you, the more I’m thinking I may have to put one of these on my rig as well.

    I’m looking forward to your review of the Platinum chip a well!

    KirtH
    Lakeville
    Posts: 4062
    #614746

    ok, someone tell me they are junk so I quit thinking of getting one

    jason-cyboron
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts: 487
    #614836

    Actually, they are junk. I wouldn’t recommend that anyone get one. It makes it hard to decide where to fish. Who wants to know where all the brush piles are anyway or what the bottom looks like. Since I bought one I’ll have to continue using it, but I would prefer it if no one else buys one.

    Jason

    jhalfen
    Posts: 4179
    #614857

    Quote:


    Actually, they are junk. I wouldn’t recommend that anyone get one. It makes it hard to decide where to fish. Who wants to know where all the brush piles are anyway or what the bottom looks like. Since I bought one I’ll have to continue using it, but I would prefer it if no one else buys one.


    I couldn’t agree more.

    I find the SI unit to be an INCREDIBLE distraction, especially while pulling cranks. I’m constantly hopping away from the kicker to look at things that the SI picks up. “Wow, look at those cribs.” “Wow, check out that rockpile”.

    I think it’s important to remember that (IMHO) these units are not fishfinders in the traditional sense (unless you re running them in “standard” mode making use of the 200 KHz beam right under the boat). They are, however, superior structure locators, for hard (rocks, timber, cribs, etc) and soft (weeds) structure alike. The ability to drop waypoints on structure that SI identifies is probably my favorite feature so far. I’ve been pulling cranks past a row of cribs that I now have waypoints for, and I’ll be able to walk right to these cribs in a couple of months, pop holes right on top of them, and (hopefully) start pulling some slabs through the ice.

    Thanks again for setting me up with this unit Wade (I’m running the smaller of the two SI units). If you’re ready to take the plunge, check out the units at Jolly Ann Sales.

    Mark Steffes
    Farmington, MN
    Posts: 1376
    #614862

    Jason, did you mount your on the bow or on the console?

    jhalfen
    Posts: 4179
    #614866

    Which Jason? Me, or bassmaster Jason?

    I have mine at the console.

    The SI transducer, which is about as big as a wallet (and thicker than my wallet typically is ) has to be mounted lower than any other transducers you have so those ducers don’t interfere with the side beams. I have my SI ducer mounted as low as I can go on my mounting board, and moved my lowrance ducer above and outboard of the SI ducer. As I mentioned in a previous post, I have been pleasantly surprised at my ability to use both the SI and my X25C at the same time, with relatively few interference issues.

    jason-cyboron
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts: 487
    #614880

    Mine is on the consol as well. Next year I plan to change out the front unit to a Hummingbird as well that way I can share waypoints between the units. Right now I have a Lowrance 334c on the bow so I after placing waypoints I have to go to the front and troll up to them and then place them on the front unit as well. The nice thing is the way I have it set up now there is no interference between the two units.

    Jason

    wade_kuehl
    Northwest Iowa
    Posts: 6166
    #615214

    Quote:


    I think it’s important to remember that (IMHO) these units are not fishfinders in the traditional sense (unless you re running them in “standard” mode making use of the 200 KHz beam right under the boat).


    Jason, You raise a good point, that I’m not sure everyone is aware of. You can use this unit in SI mode or you can switch to normal fishfinder mode as well, giving you the best of both worlds, so to speak.

    How has the unit functioned when used as a regular sonar/fishfinder for you guys?

    Quote:


    Thanks again for setting me up with this unit Wade (I’m running the smaller of the two SI units). If you’re ready to take the plunge, check out the units at Jolly Ann Sales.


    Thank you for your business Jason! (and to the “bassmaster Jason” too)

    jhalfen
    Posts: 4179
    #615217

    Quote:


    How has the unit functioned when used as a regular sonar/fishfinder for you guys?


    During my last two guide trips, I have been running the SI unit in split screen with “normal” sonar on the top half and SI on the bottom. This does not require (or even allow) the user to adjust the sonar frequencies used….it’s simply a matter of scrolling through the available split screen views until this one appears. In this mode, you get a traditional sonar view (below) as well as an SI view (sides).

    At the same time, I have been running my X25C in full screen sonar mode.

    As I mentioned above, I have not had any significant interference issues, even though both units are transmitting at 200 KHz straight down. This has been in depths as great as 25-30 feet pulling leadcore. Every once in a while, the lowrance gets confused and shifts depth scales (from 0-50 feet to 0-10 or 0-5) but it doesn’t take too long for it to recover (couple of seconds at the most).

    Best of all, whenever I see fish on my Lowrance, which I have really come to rely on during the FLW circuit and for guiding this summer, I see those same fish at the same time on the 200 KHz view on the humminbird. Even bottom huggers that are barely separated at all from the lakebed appear on both units. So, I conclude that the side imaging technology has not been included at the expense of very good down-looking sonar performance.

    KirtH
    Lakeville
    Posts: 4062
    #615286

    Stop it you are going to make get one of these yet

    gregmerz
    Minnetonka & Remer, MN
    Posts: 135
    #615292

    Quote:


    Stop it you are going to make get one of these yet


    I hear ya Kirt. Darn near inevitable…

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.