Suzuki 60 hp

  • RedHead
    Posts: 1
    #1231873

    I run a 1660 Pro-v lund with a Yamaha 50 hp four stroke. When I have a couple people in the boat and a full livewell my motor works pretty hard. The boat is rated for a 60. I’m leaning towards a Suzuki because of the cubic inches and the fuel injection. Looking for some thoughts. Any input is appreciated. Thanks

    LeoKam
    Camp Lacupolis, MN
    Posts: 183
    #248867

    Red, I have a 1660 Pro-V tiller with the Suzuki 60 4-stroke. Everything you hear about them is true. One turn of the key and it starts right up, even after long layovers. Without a carb there’s no oil or gas deposit on the engine. After 3 years of use the motor still looks like it came right off the show room floor, its so clean. And remember, the 60 is 4 cyclinders instead of 3 like the lower hp motors.

    Two minus’ for me. The motor is heavy and I’m heavy. I had to add wave whackers. When backtrolling, water would roll in over the transome into the splaswell. Also the same would happen with the wakes of passing boats while I was anchored or drift fishing. It got scarey at times but the wave whackers eliminated the problem. The second minus is speed. I had a 60 2-stroke previously and lost about 5-7 mph at WOT after installing the 4-stroke. But I dont run & gun so no big deal.

    I wouldn’t hesitate to buy another one. Maintanance and winterizing is a snap. A complete tool set is included and the manual spells everything out. If you have other questions, post them or send me a PM.

    Dave G
    Rochester, MN
    Posts: 631
    #248874

    Red,
    I have a 70 hp 4-stroke Johnson (really a Suzuki) on a 1675 Lund Explorer tiller (all 2003). The 60 hp and 70 hp have the same displacement and weight – so they must be very similar. I bought it because I wanted a 4-stroke with fuel injection (I did not want carburetors for the type of fishing I do). At first I was concerned about the weight but this Explorer has a 90-inch beam, which easily handles the motor weight, plus I also put both my batteries in the front part of the boat for better balance.

    I do not back troll so I will not be putting on splashguards, nor will I need a kicker. I find that if I put a couple 2 gallon feed buckets off the sides, I can slow troll forward at the right speed (almost at a stop — depends on the strength of the current) when pulling floaters upstream. For typical long line, or lead line trolling no buckets are needed.

    I retired this year and have already put many hours on the motor since August. It starts instantly no matter how hot or cold it is and always runs like a watch. In fact, I have purposely tried to make it kill, stumble, or surge – so far, no matter what I do to it; I cannot even make it burp. The most common thing my partners ask me when we are trolling is “Is it running?” — it is very quiet, smooth and smoke free.

    For top speed I have gotten to the low 40s by myself with the live wells empty and little gas in the tank. When adding another person and more gas, then I get into the mid 30’s. When I put up my homemade portable 5’ wide by 4’ high windshield and two people, I only get 30 mph.

    This particular motor has been in production about 5 years now as is also used in Suzuki automobiles – so I am hoping it will be reliable. There are a lot of moving parts in the motor compared to the simple 2-stroke on my last boat, so I am keeping my fingers crossed that it will last me a long time.

    From my limited experience I think it will be a good motor. It has proven to be substantially better than my previous motor but technology has improved so much that probably any new motor would be a vast improvement.

    Down side – I think they charge way too much money for the motor. Of course all the new motors are outrageously priced.

    Dave Gulczinski

    lundgeye
    Rochester, Minnesota
    Posts: 1209
    #248922

    I had the 70 hp Suzuki hidden by Evinrude colors on a 16 foot Mr Pike about 3 years ago. The motor was
    whisper quiet at idle, suel injection gave it all the attributes you’d want or expect including effortless starting,
    hot or cold. I loved mine for all those reasons but found it hard to get propped right. The salesman at this dealership
    finally had an idea which was to put a small hub prop on it and that made an incredible difference in performance.
    It did all sorts of wierd things before, made a lot of noise but was a slug out of the hole. THe small hub prop, with right
    pitch, made that boat run mid 30’s WOT light load.

    lundgeye
    Rochester, Minnesota
    Posts: 1209
    #248923

    Just in case you’re not totally set on Suzuki, my buddy just recently put a new Merc 60 EFI 4 stroke onto his
    1650 Lund. I fished out of it 2 weeks ago out of Evertts, was surprised at the small size of the power head for a 4 stroke.
    It started with ease, idled like a Timex (only say that because I don’t know how a Rolex runs) and had very good power for
    his boat. He replaced an OMC 2 stroke 60 which was a very poor engine because of center cylinder overheating. The power
    seemed very comparable to the 2 stroke, both at low end and top end. He was hitting 6000 RPM WOT with the new Merc and
    running about 33mph. I believe his prop pitch was a 12.5 or 13 SS which he bought from Cabelas.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.