I ran into Mike Meyers who sets up Rangers for Frankie’s Marine. There seems to be a bit of confusing about placing GPS antennas’s that needs clearification.
If you were mapping, the best theoretical placement of the antenna for accuracy would be to place one like the Lowrance Puck directly over the transducer. As with all things in life, that’s theoretical. Unfortunately in real life there are far more important factors. One of these is whats called shadow zones created by objects between the satilite and the antenna. This can be created by almost anything at that high of freq, even down to a person. But the big problem with installing the antenna back by the transom is the motor, an almost perfect black hole. Unless the puck was mounted on a pole so the antenna cleared the top of the engine, which is impractical, there is almost a 90 degree wedge on the horizon raising almost to straight up that will prevent any signals from coming thru, and that’s just the motor.
Second, motors are notorious for creating whats called RFI, or Radio Freguency interference. With the new fuel injection systems you have more than just the good ole spark plug problems. The nice part is that getting even half a boat lenght way can help if you have that problem, but there is now way to tell if that might be causing problems other than poor acquisition of satilites.
So you can see, having the GPS antenna and the transducer close to each other would be nice, its not a real good idea in most cases.
And one more fact. Lowrance has done a great job with its abilities to collect data so you can make your own maps, but the system is not that accurate that you need to worry about having the antenna that close to the transducer.
WarrenMN