he has sent Starlink systems to the FAA free of charge to keep everything running until something more permanent is ready. But yeah, he’s the bad guy.
I don’t even know why I’m wasting my time with this but it’s a lazy Sunday morning so why not…
A big part of what needs modernization is to replace TDM circuits (basically private dedicated lines) with IP based connectivity which is basically regular internet. I replaced many TDM circuits for customers in the last couple years and all we did was have them order Starlink and the problem was solved…
No, actually, the ISPs they use is literally the least important part and could be swapped out at any time. The actual work is how to connect their network to ours over those internet connections. There is a lot of equipment and configuration on both sides to make that happen in a way that is reliable and can deal with connectivity outages, regional outages, etc.
The only factors the internet connection plays is you want it to be generally reliable and diverse. For example, if I have two physical connections going out the same side of a building a backhoe could cut both of them at the same time. This is something that datacenters and serious businesses account for by having different ingress/egress points and ensuring physical lines don’t share the same path anywhere outside their building. If I used only Starlink what happens when it rains hard or their is high solar activity, those both interfere with it. Maybe physical and wireless (Starlink, cell, etc) would be a good mix, maybe wireless could be a third if all else fails option, and so on. Getting off track….
Ok, so simplest example is think of connecting to your work with a VPN. Does your work just ship you Starlink and you’re connected? No, it makes no difference what your home internet is; the VPN is what provides connectivity and Starlink is an option for it to ride on.
The idea that just shipping Starlink terminals somehow saves the FAA network from collapse is a joke.