there is really no way to compare what happened in 1929 to what happened this year. almost everything about our country and our money system is fundamentally different. And in most ways its better, but in some ways you could argue its not. losing the gold standard allows our gvt to go to war without its populace’s say so. Before they needed the populations approval to fund it, through war bonds and such. We rationed food and all that noise because it was something we believed in.
in the 40’s we ushered in quantitative easing en mass which can help in these crisis’ but also is not really managed by the people anymore.
1920’s: rapid expansion, market all time highs, buying stock with easy credit – followed by production decline, rising unemployment, overvalued companies, proliferation of debt and excess debt that could not be liquidated.
But it’s different this time, right? That’s the universal lie we tell ourselves.
Leading up to 2020: rapid expansion, market all time highs, buying stock with easy credit – followed by production & service decline (shutdowns), unemployment through the roof, balance sheets leveraged to the hilt & full of “goodwill value”, proliferation of debt, hiding the problem with “forbearance” agreements to keep the loans & mortgages on the books as performing (aka overvalued).
The more things change the more they stay the same…