I’m not completely against raises license fees, but 1, I don’t trust them to use the extra funds for what they say they will and 2, choosing this particular year with the ridiculous surplus this state has is extremely poor timing.
LOL!
Minnesota doesn’t hold a candle to the Dakota fisheries.
lol. St Louis and Lake county alone > either of the Dakota fisheries.
<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>bullcans wrote:</div>
LOL!
Minnesota doesn’t hold a candle to the Dakota fisheries.lol. St Louis and Lake county alone > either of the Dakota fisheries.
In no galaxy is that even remotely close to true lol. Wild take. Respect
The selling point in ND is no closed season. Plus far less people. I wouldn’t necessarily say that one is better than the other.
Some day I’d like to tag along to sakawea and spear that baby. I’ve seen some huge fish out of there!! 
It is a big jump in a couple spots, but overall I support it as long as the money goes for what it is supposed to go for.
The money will not go for what its intended, and anybody who believes that is just fooling themselves. Considering how much we are already being OVERTAXED, and the current surplus they are NOT going to give back, this increase is just insulting.
Paulski
Lots of missed pictures here.
HUGE surpluses, constant tax increases.
IF they use the money appropriately that’s great – but they won’t. They are currying favor with a few to keep their jobs at the hog trough.
Beautiful state, plentiful resources. Don’t mind paying more for that but it never happens.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
