You may not need equity in the house for the loan, but be careful on whether or not the interest is deductible as Mortgage Interest then. I would advise consulting a “knowledgeable” tax professional.
IDO » Forums » Hunting Forums » Sponsors Showcase – Sales & Product Announcements » Looking for MORE tax deductions?
Looking for MORE tax deductions?
-
March 21, 2007 at 8:37 am #1435022
You are correct about that I have yet to see one loan that has been funded that was not deductable, but good advice about consulting a tax person. I should have included that because not everyone’s financial status is going to be the same, and there are some that may not be able to take advantage of the deductions, but it is very rare. Thanks again
March 21, 2007 at 9:30 am #1435023Although some get around the rule, you can deduct the interest of up to 100% of the value of your property. If you have a 100k valued home and owe $70,000, and have a second mortgage for say $20,000, then if you go this way, you can only deduct the interest of $10,000. You also only deduct interest if you itemize. I have not yet heard of this product, does it put a lein against your property in any way? And I would assume if there is a lein then it would be third in line behind the primary and second (if there is a second mortgage). If an individual defaults on this loan, can they take your home?
March 21, 2007 at 9:54 am #1435024Yes there is a mortgage that we file against the property, and we will take a 3rd position based on the fact that we are looking at the auto/boat as collateral. This loan may work for some and may not for others, and that is not something that I can tell you until we go through a loan application and look to see where we stand. As stated above, this is something that should be talked about with your tax person
March 21, 2007 at 10:00 am #1435025In the event of default we could take the auto/boat back and if that collateral was not enough to pay the loan back in full, then yes we would look to the home to pay the balance of the loan.
March 21, 2007 at 10:43 am #1435026Over all that does sound interesting, one has to look at the after tax cost of the interest, not just the “up front” interest rate, which if you are able to deduct the interest 100% and in a higher tax bracket, makes a big difference. For example a 7% boat loan, nondeductible, vs. a 7 1/2% deductible loan: The 7 1/2% comes out cheaper in the long run.
March 21, 2007 at 1:14 pm #197765Take advantage of this great way to maximize your deductions. The credit union offers a loan product called an RPM. It stands for Regular Plus Mortgage, and we can do this on anything that you can finance. Take a truck or boat for example. You still get the same great rate and flexibility with terms, but we file a mortgage so you can deduct the interest as mortgage interest. When we do an RPM we are looking at the truck or boat as collateral, but the mortgage is there so you can take advantage of the tax deductibility. You do not need to have an appraisal done on the home to qualify for this kind of loan, there are absolutely no closing costs involved…period. Look at it this way, you have to pay interest on the loan, why not be able to deduct that interest as mortgage interest. Feel free to contact me @ 763-549-6502 for further assistance with any loan product we have to offer.
Bob Bowman
Branch ManagerMarch 21, 2007 at 1:27 pm #1435027Your illustration was correct, but the actual rule is lesser of Equity or $100,000. Like I said, consult a “knowledgeable” tax professional. (There are many that don’t fit the knowledgeable part. )
March 21, 2007 at 1:29 pm #30002You may not need equity in the house for the loan, but be careful on whether or not the interest is deductible as Mortgage Interest then. I would advise consulting a “knowledgeable” tax professional.
March 21, 2007 at 1:29 pm #551352You may not need equity in the house for the loan, but be careful on whether or not the interest is deductible as Mortgage Interest then. I would advise consulting a “knowledgeable” tax professional.
March 21, 2007 at 1:37 pm #30003You are correct about that I have yet to see one loan that has been funded that was not deductable, but good advice about consulting a tax person. I should have included that because not everyone’s financial status is going to be the same, and there are some that may not be able to take advantage of the deductions, but it is very rare. Thanks again
March 21, 2007 at 1:37 pm #551355You are correct about that I have yet to see one loan that has been funded that was not deductable, but good advice about consulting a tax person. I should have included that because not everyone’s financial status is going to be the same, and there are some that may not be able to take advantage of the deductions, but it is very rare. Thanks again
March 21, 2007 at 2:30 pm #30005Although some get around the rule, you can deduct the interest of up to 100% of the value of your property. If you have a 100k valued home and owe $70,000, and have a second mortgage for say $20,000, then if you go this way, you can only deduct the interest of $10,000. You also only deduct interest if you itemize. I have not yet heard of this product, does it put a lein against your property in any way? And I would assume if there is a lein then it would be third in line behind the primary and second (if there is a second mortgage). If an individual defaults on this loan, can they take your home?
March 21, 2007 at 2:30 pm #551382Although some get around the rule, you can deduct the interest of up to 100% of the value of your property. If you have a 100k valued home and owe $70,000, and have a second mortgage for say $20,000, then if you go this way, you can only deduct the interest of $10,000. You also only deduct interest if you itemize. I have not yet heard of this product, does it put a lein against your property in any way? And I would assume if there is a lein then it would be third in line behind the primary and second (if there is a second mortgage). If an individual defaults on this loan, can they take your home?
March 21, 2007 at 2:54 pm #30006Yes there is a mortgage that we file against the property, and we will take a 3rd position based on the fact that we are looking at the auto/boat as collateral. This loan may work for some and may not for others, and that is not something that I can tell you until we go through a loan application and look to see where we stand. As stated above, this is something that should be talked about with your tax person
March 21, 2007 at 2:54 pm #551399Yes there is a mortgage that we file against the property, and we will take a 3rd position based on the fact that we are looking at the auto/boat as collateral. This loan may work for some and may not for others, and that is not something that I can tell you until we go through a loan application and look to see where we stand. As stated above, this is something that should be talked about with your tax person
March 21, 2007 at 3:00 pm #30007In the event of default we could take the auto/boat back and if that collateral was not enough to pay the loan back in full, then yes we would look to the home to pay the balance of the loan.
March 21, 2007 at 3:00 pm #551402In the event of default we could take the auto/boat back and if that collateral was not enough to pay the loan back in full, then yes we would look to the home to pay the balance of the loan.
March 21, 2007 at 3:32 pm #1435028“but the actual rule is lesser of Equity or $100,000”
Or $50,000 if married filing separately.
March 21, 2007 at 3:43 pm #30008Over all that does sound interesting, one has to look at the after tax cost of the interest, not just the “up front” interest rate, which if you are able to deduct the interest 100% and in a higher tax bracket, makes a big difference. For example a 7% boat loan, nondeductible, vs. a 7 1/2% deductible loan: The 7 1/2% comes out cheaper in the long run.
March 21, 2007 at 3:43 pm #551452Over all that does sound interesting, one has to look at the after tax cost of the interest, not just the “up front” interest rate, which if you are able to deduct the interest 100% and in a higher tax bracket, makes a big difference. For example a 7% boat loan, nondeductible, vs. a 7 1/2% deductible loan: The 7 1/2% comes out cheaper in the long run.
March 21, 2007 at 3:48 pm #1435030Bob,
I want to apologize to you if you took my post as “taking a shot at you.” That was not the intent, whatsoever. My intent was to caution everyone to use/contact a tax advisor to make sure the interest would be deductible/advantageous to them.
Apparently I ruffled at least one person’s feathers. Sorry for the confusion.
JD
March 21, 2007 at 3:59 pm #1435031Thats ok, I don’t claim to be a “knowledgeable” tax professional, but I did sleep at a Holiday Inn last night.
March 21, 2007 at 6:27 pm #30010Your illustration was correct, but the actual rule is lesser of Equity or $100,000. Like I said, consult a “knowledgeable” tax professional. (There are many that don’t fit the knowledgeable part. )
March 21, 2007 at 6:27 pm #551542Your illustration was correct, but the actual rule is lesser of Equity or $100,000. Like I said, consult a “knowledgeable” tax professional. (There are many that don’t fit the knowledgeable part. )
March 21, 2007 at 6:37 pm #1435035Quote:
Bob,
I want to apologize to you if you took my post as “taking a shot at you.” That was not the intent, whatsoever. My intent was to caution everyone to use/contact a tax advisor to make sure the interest would be deductible/advantageous to them.
Apparently I ruffled at least one person’s feathers. Sorry for the confusion.
JD
No problem at all ….I agree with you 100%, it is something that we always talk about with our members when we do these loans. I have no background in tax advising, just loans!
Thanks
March 21, 2007 at 8:07 pm #1435036Whenever you change your financial status, it is highly advisable to consult a tax person first. A simple phone call could save you thousands when you “think” you are saving yourself some money.
March 21, 2007 at 8:32 pm #30016“but the actual rule is lesser of Equity or $100,000”
Or $50,000 if married filing separately.
March 21, 2007 at 8:32 pm #551626“but the actual rule is lesser of Equity or $100,000”
Or $50,000 if married filing separately.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.