<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>39degrees wrote:</div>
The president said that when the looting starts the shooting starts. You referenced breaking a window. So should anyone who is suspected of breaking a window be shot?
Did I imply that anyone suspected of breaking a window should be shot?
To take the presidents comment about looting/shooting, and somehow turning that into me equating “rioters who break a window, loot, and commit arson deserve a consequence” with “those breaking a window should be shot“ is a special type of logic.
Sorry about that. I thought the president was quite clear with his view of the consequences looting starts shooting starts. Your post mentioned looting and consequences. I equated the two. I am sick of the violent protests. I Apologize. I just think that there is a lot of talk on this string and national guard string about violence stopping violence and that, to me is an unending circle.