I like hearing a variety of opinions supported by facts, but Dr. McCullough presented a few things that were just false.
Myself included but this is a red flag. Someone can make a prediction that turns out to be false or someone can clearly speculate and end up being wrong. When someone passes something off as fact that is clearly false, those are huge red flags to me.
my aunt’s example is anecdotal like everything in this thread but there is a lot of data out there. The early reinfection data was derived from genomic sequencing. Basically confirming that the second infection was of a different genetic makeup as the first. This was difficult because there was little genomic sequencing at the beginning but is absolute proof that reinfections were occurring. This was back in the summer of 2020. Not sure how they determine reinfection today though.
The consensus is that immune response from infection can be strong for some and very weak to nonexistent for others. Severity of illness was one of the correlations with immune response. The problem, the immune response varies widely when compared to vaccination.
Immunity is critical to ending this pandemic. Dangerous variants are born in people who have very long illnesses. If you can significantly reduce those long illnesses or prevent infection through immune response, you greatly reduce the chance of variants occurring.
It’s possible omicron is our way out of this since there is still going to be a large portion of the population that won’t get vaccinated but the cost of this running through the population is unknown. This variant is showing it significantly reduces effectiveness of prior immunity from infection and initial vaccination regimen. Although all signs so far point to less severe disease, we don’t know yet if the increased transmissibility and immune evasion will lead to increased hospitalizations and deaths. It likely will but how much is the big question.
It could also just fizzle out without reason just like many other waves have.