Corps seeks comments on habitat restoration project on Pigs Eye Lake (St Paul)

  • Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #1759033

    NEWS RELEASE
    ST. PAUL DISTRICT

    March 12, 2018

    MVP-PA-2018-008

    Patrick Loch: 651-290-5679, 651-315-3887, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

    Patrick Moes: 651-290-5202, 651-366-7539, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

    Corps seeks comments on habitat restoration project on Pigs Eye Lake

    ST. PAUL, Minn. – The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District, released a draft Environmental Assessment, or EA, for a project to restore backwater habitat on Pigs Eye Lake, near St. Paul, March 12.

    The proposed project, planned in collaboration with Ramsey County, would enhance and restore backwater habitat by creating island and wetland features on Pigs Eye Lake using material dredged from the Mississippi River by the Corps of Engineers during routine maintenance of the navigation channel. A complex of seven islands would be constructed, benefitting the area by serving as wind barriers to reduce shoreline erosion, improving habitat for migratory birds, stabilizing the lake bottom and providing a beneficial use for more than 400,000 cubic yards of dredged material.

    The proposed fill action would involve placing clean sand, topsoil and rock into Pigs Eye Lake with a total footprint of approximately 40 acres. Work is scheduled to begin in 2019 and anticipated to take approximately two years for construction and planting, with additional monitoring and management to follow. The project would have temporary, minor adverse impacts on noise levels, aesthetic values and recreational opportunities, but would ultimately benefit habitat, habitat diversity, recreation, commercial navigation and surface water quality.

    A draft EA that describes the project and the environmental impacts in detail is available to the public and can be viewed and downloaded from the St. Paul District website at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Home/PublicNotices.aspx <http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Home/PublicNotices.aspx&gt; .

    Questions on the project or comments on the EA can be directed to Aaron Mcfarlane, project biologist, at

    651-290-5660 or [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> . Please address all formal written correspondence on this project to the St. Paul District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ATTN: Regional Planning and Environment Division North, 180 5th St. E., Suite 700, St. Paul, MN 55101.

    The nearly 600 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District, employees working at more than 40 sites in five upper-Midwest states serve the American public in the areas of environmental enhancement, navigation, flood damage reduction, water and wetlands regulation, recreation sites and disaster response. Through the St. Paul District Fiscal Year 2016 $78 million budget, nearly 1,250 non-Corps jobs were added to the regional economy as well as $120 million to the national economy. For more information, see http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil <http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil&gt; .

    -30-

    TROUTMAN
    S.E.Minnesota
    Posts: 304
    #1759100

    Thanks for this,Brian.Anyone know what happened to the pool 3 habitat restoration project that was supposed to start last year?

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #1759103

    The North Lake project was scuttled “because of legal issues”.

    “Progress on the plan has been stopped by concerns over balancing beneficial environmental effects and adverse socioeconomic effects, and related state and federal regulations.”

    The MN DNR is still (last I heard) planning on stabilizing the banks of Brewers Cut with rip rap.

    Jon Jordan
    Keymaster
    St. Paul, Mn
    Posts: 6019
    #1759106

    So your saying they ran out of areas to dump toxic dredge? Suppose its as good a spot as any. Was the St Paul dumping grounds/sewage area for years….

    -J.

    Steve Root
    South St. Paul, MN
    Posts: 5623
    #1759111

    While they’re at it, maybe they could open up the channel into hog lake a little bit too.

    TROUTMAN
    S.E.Minnesota
    Posts: 304
    #1759115

    That just might be the biggest bunch of bureaucratical BS I’ve ever heard.

    Jon Jordan
    Keymaster
    St. Paul, Mn
    Posts: 6019
    #1759116

    While they’re at it, maybe they could open up the channel into hog lake a little bit too.

    They are going to have to open something up to get barges full of dredge back there!

    -J.

    Mike W
    MN/Anoka/Ham lake
    Posts: 13294
    #1759126

    I was just looking for that in the plan and could not find anything that addresses access to work site. This plan has been talked about for a number of years now. Tuna boat owners were happy with it wanting some of those islands to have nice sand beaches on them. Didnt really see that in this plan either.

    Jon Jordan
    Keymaster
    St. Paul, Mn
    Posts: 6019
    #1759133

    If they make islands out in Pigs Eye, they will likely be bird/animal sanctuaries and off limits to people would be my assumption. Probably wouldn’t want your kids making sand castles in the crud anyway…

    -J.

    Mike W
    MN/Anoka/Ham lake
    Posts: 13294
    #1759153

    My thought was upper river barges services wold love to have a parade of tuna boats sharing their barge channel to get in there. Then once they got up to the lake how to get to the islands in a foot of water. Letting your wife and kids enjoys hours of playing in toxic sludge thats on them. Couldnt be any worse than what happened in Tromaville.

    buschman
    Pool 2
    Posts: 1760
    #1759160

    The only way the dredge will access pigs eye is through the barge channel.. They will have to do half their dredging just to get into that lake. I wouldn’t mind them doing this at all. Might help. Cannot hurt anything back there. It has got worst every year now. I would love to see them open the hog side back up but don’t think they will do anything about that. I would be nice though. I agree.

    Jon Jordan
    Keymaster
    St. Paul, Mn
    Posts: 6019
    #1759170

    Don’t get me wrong on this. I’m not against the plan at all. Just call it what it is. Its a dredge/dump project. Not a restoration project!

    -J.

    buschman
    Pool 2
    Posts: 1760
    #1759284

    I agree Jon, it sure sounds nice though.. hahaha

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.