Cellular carriers

  • John Rasmussen
    Blaine
    Posts: 6334
    #2218065

    Serious suckage. Suckville, USA. Big time suckathon. The Big Suckowski.

    So your saying the coverage is no good. jester

    supercat
    Eau Claire, WI
    Posts: 1332
    #2218132

    I have had both att and verizon, both are good in some areas and both are bad. I am currently with att because they are the only carrier that offers 50gb tether data in Canada. You can get higher tether data with other carriers but it is extremely exspensive. With att its just $15.

    ShldHveBenHreYserdy
    MN
    Posts: 184
    #2218183

    verizon has been pretty good overall for us, but spendy. Thinking of going to “visible” by verizon

    like rj said, we are in baxter and get 1-2 bars for verizon but all in all coverage in most areas.

    Jackpine brewery has 5G and that works great grin

    Bearcat89
    North branch, mn
    Posts: 20334
    #2218188

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>Deuces wrote:</div>
    Serious suckage. Suckville, USA. Big time suckathon. The Big Suckowski.

    So your saying the coverage is no good.

    He was just saying its sucky, sucks, suckerson and sucks even more

    Gitchi Gummi
    Posts: 3021
    #2218215

    Verizon is the way to go, You hear about everyone else complaining but you never hear a Verizon customer complaining about coverage. Just saying……..

    verizon is great in big cities… at&t is way better than verizon once you get off the beaten path, especially in the areas I hunt in northern MN. Specifically, in the Superior National Forest and areas around the BWCA, at&t is far better than verizon.

    but yes, you’re right. you’re not going to hear many complaints about verizon in the concrete jungle

Viewing 5 posts - 31 through 35 (of 35 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.