What Sturgeon Eat

  • farmboy1
    Mantorville, MN
    Posts: 3668
    #1220767

    I recently sent a email to the MN DNR after reading all the people up in arms about Sturgeon being reintroduced into Upper Red Lake. I knew what I have caught fish on, but not what they normally eat, and since there are a lot of people who think Sturgeon feed exclusively on walleye eggs, I specifically asked that question. I have not been able to look up the specific studies he refered to, but hope to get my hands on them in the future. I have Mr. Thompsons email if anyone has any questions for him, PM me as I don’t want to post it without his permission. Here is his response:

    Feeding ecology of lake sturgeon has been studied, primarily in Canada. Here is one such study: Beamish, F.W.H., D.L.G. Noakes and A. Rossiter, 1998. Feeding ecology of juvenile lake sturgeon, Acipenser fulvescens, in northern Ontario. Can. Field-Nat. 112(3):459-468.

    There is also some discussion of lake sturgeon diet items in Fishes of Wisconsin, by George C. Becker-1983, University of Wisconsin Press; and in Freshwater Fishes of Canada, W.B. Scott and E.J. Crossman, Bulletin 184 – Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Ottawa 1973.

    These types of studies are not commonly found in the “gray literature.” To find this type of information, you pretty much have to gain access to a university library, where such peer-reviewed journal articles are available.

    To summarize the findings of these studies: lake sturgeon eat a wide variety of food items commonly found inhabiting aquatic substrates, including crustaceans (e.g., crayfish, amphipods), insect larvae (e.g., dragonflies, mayflies, midges), nematodes, leeches, clams, snails, plants, dead fish and other detritus. Fish eggs and fish larvae are consumed occasionally as well when they are available.

    In the case of walleye eggs, I would think they would be eaten more as an incidental item since walleye are “broadcast” spawners, and their eggs are small and become widely scattered after spawning. In addition, walleye produce far more eggs than needed for successful reproduction, so some eggs lost to predation are inconsequential.

    Sincerely,

    Andy Thompson

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #618749

    I wonder how many small walleye eat walleye eggs or walleye fry. Some people are so ignorant and naive. Like the carp, they see a fish with a downward mouth and come to the conclusion that they feast only on eggs deposited on the bottom.

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 60002
    #618799

    As a reclined arm chair biologist, you’ve started me on a roll Pug!

    I wonder how many crappies and pike eat walleye eggs and fry?

    Wait! I wonder what’s eating the LS eggs?? (besides people I mean. )

    Farmboy, where did you find the info on reintroducing LS to Red Lake? I missed that one.

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #618815

    Call me crazy, but I think Mother Nature is a bit smarter than us collectively. And Farmboy did say REintroduce. Lemme guess, man eradicated them? Guess what the biggest threat to walleye eggs are? Yup, men with fishing poles and no sense of conservation.

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 60002
    #618820

    Pug…you’re starting to scare me…not so much by making sense…but using the gremlin so much.

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 60002
    #618828

    Thanx PB!

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #618835

    I don’t use that one that much. Only special occasions. When I first started, I used this guy all the time.
    I miss that guy. But I digress.

    So the little guys were jumping out of the water upon being released? Since they were raised in a hatchery, I wonder if the treat the water for parasites? If so, that would shoot holes in the theory that they jump because of parasites. A theory that I never really thought much of as the biologist in the one article put it, parasites are equipped to cling and no amount of jumping is going to knock them off. Maybe it is their joyful expression.
    Here’s to a successful reintroduction. Perhaps our great grandkids will hold a sturgeon excursion to Red lake….man, that’s kind of depressing.

    farmboy1
    Mantorville, MN
    Posts: 3668
    #618858

    Thanks for the post Pier.

    There has been some discussion an a few “other” areas with the sturgeon being blamed for everything from eating walleyes to male pattern baldness And being all the locals at Rainy/LOW think they eat eggs, I wanted to get an opinion other then my “bar room biology” degree

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 60002
    #619151

    Quote:


    male pattern baldness


    Ok…that’s it…from now on, I’m throwing them on the rocks!

    farmboy1
    Mantorville, MN
    Posts: 3668
    #619183

    Quote:


    Quote:


    male pattern baldness


    Ok…that’s it…from now on, I’m throwing them on the rocks!


    Some of us don’t have a whole lot left, so some conservation is in order

    life1978
    Eau Claire , WI
    Posts: 2790
    #619388

    Guess that’s why everyone takes their pictures with hats on

    Quote:


    Quote:


    male pattern baldness


    Ok…that’s it…from now on, I’m throwing them on the rocks!


    crazyice
    Posts: 33
    #619469

    Hopefully all goes well with the reintroduction. I read a similar articl in the outdoor news a couple of weeks ago. In that article they said that there would be 10,000 sturgeon per year released for 10 years. So if all goes well there should be a self sustaining population eventually. If the Red Lak band and DNR can pull off what they did with the walleyes of that lake we could be in for some tremendous fishing oppurtunities, after retirement ofcourse!!

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 60002
    #619483

    Just wondering if the dam has been removed??

    Or are they thinking it will be in the next 20 years??

    ggoody
    Mpls MN
    Posts: 2603
    #619496

    I’m not sure on that but I would assume it will be removed or modified like they are doing with Dams in the Upper water shed of the Red River which is also part of the Sturgeon project.

    A lot of those low head dams are being removed or replaced on the river with rock/riffle dams which turns them into structures that resemble rock-riffle rapids the result is a dam that still retains water without the dangerous roller currents associated with lowhead dams and allows species such as walleyes and catfish to access upstream habitat they couldn’t reach with lowhead dams.

    Here is some info on the Lake Sturgeon restoration in the Red River of the North watershed.

    http://www.fws.gov/midwest/NEPA/RedRiverNEPA/Documents/AppendixG.pdf

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.