Great post, Gary. I hate that the regs are so ambiguous when it comes to these things.
Quote:
This is a tool used all over the US to collect bait. It should be stated in the regs clearly whether it’s legal to use one. It’s not like it’s an oddball thing.
Why do we always have to guess????
I guess when it comes to ambiguous things like this (cast nets not being called out in the regs), or rules that are just plain stupid and make absolutely no difference in safety or fishery quality mainetnance (9 inch bullies illegal when a 7 incher is legal) I’m just going to use the system that makes the most sense — good old fashioned knowledge of right and wrong.
To the fellow who thinks I’m having a ‘bad day’ because I can’t follow the rules, I guess I have the mindset that there’s rules and enforcers in place for two reasons — a) some people don’t have enough common sense to know what’s right and wrong without having things spelled out for them and b) some people don’t care to do what’s right even if they know the difference. I am neither of those folks.
Doing the “legal” thing doesn’t always make one a better person. Certainly you can’t tell me that ‘legal and illegal’ corresponds exactly with ‘right and wrong’. At one time it was legal in North Dakota to shoot an Indian as long as it’s from a covered wagon. It might still be legal, I haven’t checked lately. It was also illegal to hang both mens and womens underwear on the same clothesline in Minnesota at one time (maybe still is?).
I tend to think that fewer sheep and more common sense would better our society. The problem is that the common sense is lacking in so many people. It’s a pipe dream to think we could ever get by with FEWER laws/rules…Just like I drive might 5-10 miles over the speed limit where it is safe to do so (or 5-30 miles under the speed limit where/when that’s the safest speed to travel), I will continue to make my own judgement calls on regs that are either ambiguous or just plain stupid, and I’ll take any punishment that I might end up with because of that decision.
Taxpayers weren’t always so willing to give huge piles of money to governments to make and enforce more rules and regulations….it’s a relatively new thing, actually. The inherent notions of right and wrong are much older, and always more correct.
Laws are merely written rules that try to convey through language the concept of right and wrong, and do it in such a way that it’s enforceable by the CO/Police. You can only spell out the rules so explicitly before your regulations ‘booklet’ that people pick up at the counter when they get their license becomes too thick for the average person to read or comprehend. Beyond that, one has to rely on interpretation, reading between the lines, etc. I’m glad Thor has interpreted and decided that a casting net and a seine net aren’t really different when it comes to RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, which is what it’s all about, really.