Stink Bait-Dip Tubes-Treble Hooks & The DNR

  • Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #1222298

    It was pointed out earlier to me that treble hooks covered with stink bait might be illegal in MN. So I was off to find the answer. I did find in the regulation book that trebles can’t be used unless they are part of a “lure” in MN. With that I had more questions.

    Can I use stink on a treble?

    What about the dip tubes with treble hooks?

    How can a Mepps spinner be legal?

    I could have talked with the DNR offices in St Paul, but in this case, I wanted to know how the local Conservation Officer is handling it. After all, this is the guy that I’ll be trying to explain myself to. Here’s what I found out after talking to Red Wing MN based CO Tyler Quant…

    Quote:


    Adding fiber bait to the treble hook would NOT make it legal. The fiber bait is no different than any other bait you would add to the hook. The bait itself would not be illegal but using the treble hook is. Thanks and if you have any further questions let me know.

    Tyler Quandt

    Conservation Officer


    After sending CO Quant a photo of a run of the mill dip bait tube that we can buy at any bait shop his response is as follows.

    Quote:


    Correct, in MN this would NOT meet the definition of an artificial lure. It is legal on the WI side because they allow treble hooks. If you wanted to make it legal in MN you would have to use the tube with either a single hook or if it was used with a treble hook the treble hook would need to be part of an artificial lure. Thanks.

    Tyler Quandt

    Conservation Officer


    Photo below is of an illegal MN catfish hook. (Wonder how many bait shops in MN know this?)

    Looks like it’s back to the circle hook and horizontal dip bait tube!

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #969027

    Here’s a photo of a legal catfish tube bait.

    Steve Root
    South St. Paul, MN
    Posts: 5649
    #969035

    This is getting sillier all the time. What if you ran a steel leader up through the tube and jerked it over the weeds for Muskies? Is it legal then? How is a red plastic tube any less “artificial” than a rubber worm? Could I rig a ringworm with a treble hook and use it for Bass? How about if I used a ringworm and gooped it up with stink bait, and let it sit on the bottom?

    In the winter guys like to use quick-strike rigs on Pike, BECAUSE THEY ARE EASIER ON THE FISH. However in Minnesota they’re illegal unless you stick a spinner on a clevis on the line. So a big sucker minnow with two hooks in him is legal as long as you add this dinky, insignificant little spinner. Then it’s “OK”. I don’t get it.

    Rootski

    sauger
    Hastings ,MN
    Posts: 2442
    #969037

    Brian, I always cut the trebles off anyway. Then thread the whole tube on my leader and tie on a circle. Slide it on down and dip away. Trebles are really hard on channels when they get down in thier throat.

    cat-stevens
    Rochester,MN
    Posts: 449
    #969055

    Hey Brian, just tie a ribbon above it

    Seriously, I have always felt it would be a little sketchy even going with the dip bait set-ups you can buy, so I have always used the circle hook and surgical tube rig with good success. I imagine when cattin through the ice a guy could dip a jiggin spoon into the ole’ fiber if you really wanted to use a treble…

    Whiskerkev
    Madison
    Posts: 3835
    #969061

    What a bunch of bogus hooey. So you can hang a treble hook under a tipup with a blade on it and it is legal. I would move across the river if I didn’t live here already. We have better laws, better football, and baseball lately. Circle hooks do work OK. I only lost 4 of 10 bites instead of none when I tried them a couple of times. I’ve caught hundreds of Channel cats with trebles and not injured more than one or two.

    I pulled this string from another website. So if you put a blade on it less than 3 inches from the multiple hook, you’d have an argument. I’d ask the CO to clean off your bait prior to inspecting it for good measure.

    As you have pointed out this is a very confusing topic, especially

    since

    there is no clear legal definition of “artificial lure”. We looked

    into

    doing a statutory definition for the current legislative session, but

    as

    you point out we have a number of issues to address. We hope to have

    this issue cleared up and proposed legislation passed next session.

    Your recommendation for the regulation booklet will also be considered

    for next year. Otherwise, DNR Enforcement has been using the

    following

    definition:

    1. Angling with a multiple hook, either bare or baited, is unlawful

    unless it is attached to an artificial bait or trolling spoon.

    2. Artificial baits are jigs, plugs, spoons, artificial flies, and

    spinner-hook arrangements.

    3. When a spinner is used with a baited multiple hook, it must be

    placed so as to become a part of the hook, and in no instance shall it

    be placed more than three (3) inches from a multiple hook.

    In answer to your specific questions

    A jig with a stinger hook is an artificial lure as long as the stinger

    is made part of the jig and no more than 3 inches from the jig.

    The single bead in front of the worm harness does not make it an

    artificial lure. Instead, you would need to put a spinner in front of

    it as mentioned above in #3.

    dtro
    Inactive
    Jordan
    Posts: 1501
    #969068

    The only person that knows the real answer is the Judge. Ask 10 different CO’s to interpret that rule and you’ll get 5 yes’s and 5 no’s They can write a ticket for just about anything, it’s up to a Judge to enforce it.

    If I had a ton of money and time, it sure would be fun to test out some of these laws in court because my guess is that a lot of them are chock full discrepancies.

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #969075

    That’s the reason I asked the CO on the waters I fish Darren. In my world, he’s the one that counts.

    Once a ticket is written, the citizen loses even if they win in court there’s time, time lost from work and possibly attorney fees.

    I’m thinking that a few example to a coming up work shop might be in order.

    dfresh
    Fridley, MN
    Posts: 3053
    #969090

    Please bring brand new clean ones or you certainly won’t make any friends!

    rod-man
    Pine City, MN.
    Posts: 1279
    #969097

    Hey Brian
    I just got off the phone with the southern reg.fisheries expert.He said that he catfishes and uses dip worms and they are considered lures. he said he would send me a email with clarification on it and will email the COs also
    He (Steve) said to go ahead and use them with out worry

    mplspug
    Palmetto, Florida
    Posts: 25026
    #969100

    Is the law designed to prevent people from purposely snagging fish or is it to prevent damage top fish that might get hooked deep?

    Ron Johnsen
    Platteville wi
    Posts: 2969
    #969112

    BK move to Wisconsin my god what a bunch of bull ====

    Ron Johnsen
    Platteville wi
    Posts: 2969
    #969113

    either that start smoking again & burn the line oops

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #969115

    I’m thinking someone didn’t get that memo Rod Man!

    I’ll shoot you a pm.

    Jack Naylor
    Apple Valley, MN
    Posts: 5668
    #969202

    waiting for Frank’s reply.
    Jack

    northstar42
    west central Minnesotsa
    Posts: 921
    #969211

    It would be very interesting to see a DNR officer try to explain to a jury why a tube worm was not an artificial lure.

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #969213

    The CO doesn’t have to explain the law, that would be the attorney.

    Co’s don’t make the laws. Personally, I wish they had more of a hand in law making, might be less goofy laws out there!

    herb
    6ft under
    Posts: 3242
    #969223

    Minne Ha Ha, you make me laugh.

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #969766

    Near as I can tell, the out come here is:

    A bare treble (with or without stink bait) is illegal.

    Bait tubes that hold stink bait with a treble are illegal.

    To make them legal in MN, we much attach the treble to the tube (which by definition will make it a lure) or attach a spinner of some type within 3 inches*** of the treble.

    ***I couldn’t find any language in the law that talked about 3 inches, but that’s what was recommended.

    MN’s first ever Catfish Workshop held by our DNR will be coming up here in June. This will be a topic of discussion for sure.

    In the mean time, I’ve found that using 1/2 of a dip bait tube and a 3/0 Double Action or circle hook works great for the Team Catfish brand fiber bait.



    CatLance
    Donahue, Iowa
    Posts: 7
    #969788

    That is a crazy law. We use the tubes all the time down here. Even just use a treble with a spring on it at times.

    Lance

    northstar42
    west central Minnesotsa
    Posts: 921
    #970586

    I have used single hooks with tubes for years and had no trouble catching cats. No need for a treble. Just makes it harder to get the hooks out. There is a real problem with stink baits anyway as cats usually swallow the hooks and are difficult to catch and release because of mortality. If they are hitting stink bait, they really pound it.

    aanderud
    Posts: 221
    #970589

    You’re not kidding about trebles being harder to get out. I was using some type of ice fishing jig with a treble hook on it last year and it was a 10 minute adventure unhooking the buggers. It wasn’t but 10 fish into the day that I busted off one hook, the a second a few fish later, and finished the day out with just a single hook. From that point on I just go with single hooks, going so far as swapping them out if I happen to buy a jib with a treble on it.

    CatLance
    Donahue, Iowa
    Posts: 7
    #970689

    I catch alot of my Catfish in the lips with treble hooks from my dip worms. For the ones that do swallow it I have a speciel tool designed just for removing dip worms. It is the the Catfish worm hook remover made by Doc’s Catfish bait Co. out of Parkersburg, IA. It works great, and I loose very few fish to death.

    Lance

    Brian Klawitter
    Keymaster
    Minnesota/Wisconsin Mississippi River
    Posts: 59992
    #970700

    I’m with you on that Cat Lance.

    When I was told by a guide “down south” than more fish were hooked deeper with circles than with a treble, not only didn’t I believe him, I called him a liar.

    But then all of my experience with trebles prior was with live or cut bait. So I gave them a shot myself.

    As I’ve said before, the only trouble I’ve had with a treble is when a smaller cat gets hooked in the upper and lower part of the mouth at the same time. Most channels are hooked in the lips.

    My experience has made me a believer in trebles with stink bait.

    shawnil
    Posts: 467
    #970957

    Quote:


    I have used single hooks with tubes for years and had no trouble catching cats. No need for a treble.


    Agree totally with you Northstar… I only recently (within the last few years) started using single hooks all the time for dip baits (worm or tube rigged) and they work great. And in in Illinois it’s legal to with like 1000 hooks at a time. Ok, 50.

    Shawn

Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.