Can the Pack beat the Vikes

This one really has to sting for you guys.

To answer the question…

I believe they just DID!!!!

And then the crickets chirp……

I guess I called this game almost spot on.
Packers 4 penalties for 19 yards though I didnt know the vikes would have at least 9 penalties for over 100 yards after being one of least penalized in the league. Vikes imploaded.
Zimmer has to quit making esxuses for “deer in the headlights” Bridgewater and realize the second coming cant make quick decisions and go back to quick passes more regularly.

If you want to crown there ass, crown there ass!!!

I feel your embarrassment now….. wait, we didn’t lose to the Lions…

Not what I wanted, but this game was not a season defining one… yet.

bigpike wrote:

If you want to crown there ass, crown there ass!!!

A little testy aren’t we………?

your o-line sucks

I was honestly expecting more from the queens after all the talk on here this week about how good they are. They seemed mediocre at best. TB will be one sore dude tomorrow.

I wonder what Debra Dallas aka jd winston aka gabe has to say about all this?

I read two postings on this thread, the first… and the most recent, priceless!

Started w….
NO! Oh, I’m back on the Vikes bandwagon. #2 defense looks pretty awesome. AP has the fire burning again.
Next Sunday the Green Bay Packers will have 4 losses in a row.

Eelpoutguy wrote:

I’m officially off the Vikings bandwagon, for the 54 straight year. I’m moving to sconny!

We did play a terrible game… that’s the bright spot for me. Looked like the team that played San Fran and lost… 7-3 is well, 7-3, you know how that is. The only thing worse than the Vikings play, was the head referee.. I was waiting for his green and gold panties to be thrown on the roughing Rogers play…. my god, is he not a FB player ???

six sacks and a fumble most teams lose.

I say yep. plus it souned almost like a home game on tv.

Typical Vikes. Can’t win a big game. They can get to the big game, but same result. Choke under the pressure Grrrr…..

-J.

I am not worried, most teams have let downs… heck the Pack were on a 3 game skid… they were due and the Vikings were due for a let down. That team that played today, did not look familiar… this was not the Superbowl so… still full speed ahead They abandoned any kind of run game around the ends… when AP starts doing that (and hangs onto the ball) it opens up the passing game and the middle of the line. I hang alot of this on Norv Turner and his lack of using his playbook. And like clockwork, as soon as I bench Lacy, he starts in again.

big_g wrote:

We did play a terrible game… that’s the bright spot for me. Looked like the team that played San Fran and lost… 7-3 is well, 7-3, you know how that is. The only thing worse than the Vikings play, was the head referee.. I was waiting for his green and gold panties to be thrown on the roughing Rogers play…. my god, is he not a FB player ???

He did take 2 steps and push him. Wasn’t malice at all but he could of slowed up and that’s what the nfl wants

I like these coaches we have but for the love of peter there has to be a contingency plan when the front line gets man handled. Turner ever heard of a quarter back rolling out away from the attack up the middle.
You right big_g turner did not do so well. I would not put it only on him. Zimmer’s defensive plan sucked! he wasnt prepaired for the run one bit like yousaid. One more thing a qb like rogers thats deadly on roling out for escapes how do they not contain the outside?

Typical, barely compete in the biggest game they’ve had in years.. Not surprised

The answer to the original post is YES. In fact rodgers pretty much owns the vikings for the last 5 years. 😨

Greg Coleman’s preach on the radio before the game was probably one of the sweetest moments I’ve heard, epic!

Its a small part of the big picture, but Walsh is killing me this year. After missing that extra point I almost threw off my headphones into the lake.

big_g wrote:

We did play a terrible game… that’s the bright spot for me. Looked like the team that played San Fran and lost… 7-3 is well, 7-3, you know how that is. The only thing worse than the Vikings play, was the head referee.. I was waiting for his green and gold panties to be thrown on the roughing Rogers play…. my god, is he not a FB player ???

An excuse is like a crutch…..only for the lame and the ViQueens

There is no way that the Queen’s can’t win this game, after all they are destined to win the super bowl…..oh wait! Wrong team, sorry!

We laugh but they all walked away millionaires at the end.

all i will say. i will tune n to PA,tomrrow

rkd-jim wrote:

WE’LL SEE……………..

Your confidence before the game in this thread spoke volumes…. what you have to say “after” the game, means about as much to me as your first post did before the game. Your irrelevant at this point…. typical Fudgie response.

“rkd-jim wrote:

WE’LL SEE……………..

Your confidence before the game in this thread spoke volumes…. what you have to say “after” the game, means about as much to me as your first post did before the game. Your irrelevant at this point…. typical Fudgie response. ”

Love the come-back G!

Now….if the Vikes are SO bad, why is GB having the same 7-3 record as the Vikes? Lots of football left. GB caved in for three games prior to beating the Vikes which means they are capable of doing it again.

Got a few undefeated teams out there yet so a 7-3 scorecard right now isn’t all that promising for either the Vikes or GB. GB gave up bragging rights when they handed out 3 wins to lesser teams. 7-3, just like the Vikes. No worse, no better. And lots of football to be played yet

Tom- All that doesn’t matter. We just whooped your…

catmando wrote:

all i will say. i will tune n to PA,tomrrow

Think I might do the same.

Not rubbing it in as I’m

Tom Sawvell wrote:

“rkd-jim wrote:

WE’LL SEE……………..

Your confidence before the game in this thread spoke volumes…. what you have to say “after” the game, means about as much to me as your first post did before the game. Your irrelevant at this point…. typical Fudgie response. ”

Love the come-back G!

Now….if the Vikes are SO bad, why is GB having the same 7-3 record as the Vikes? Lots of football left. GB caved in for three games prior to beating the Vikes which means they are capable of doing it again.

Got a few undefeated teams out there yet so a 7-3 scorecard right now isn’t all that promising for either the Vikes or GB. GB gave up bragging rights when they handed out 3 wins to lesser teams. 7-3, just like the Vikes. No worse, no better. And lots of football to be played yet

They are better in the sense they just whipped the vikings. They will be better when the season ends.

Vikings could not win a game rest of the season. They will only be favored in 1 game in the final 6. Falcons, Seahawks, Cardinals,Giants, and PACKERS will be favored over the vikings. Vikings probably beat Chicago, coin flip against the Giants, and maybe the Falcons. Schedule is brutal for them.

Packers will be favored against Chicago, Detroit, Dallas, Raiders, and vikings. Packers should win 4-5 of their final 6. Besting airzona will be a huge statement if they can pull it off.

The reason the reply was so short was I wanted all you queenies to hang yourselves early. Don’t you just love it when a plan comes together

“Packers should win 4-5″…..Blacktrans…..

They shouldn’t have lost the three they did.

Its just a game as far as I am concerned. I gain nothing from football and actually would rather watch college ball. In the end when GB advances thru the play-offs and the Vikes are finished I most always give the neighbors the cheers. And not the Bears. But as long as the Vikes have games I cheer them on.

I honestly thought a couple of Mn’s front O line should be carrying garbage cans today for the way they played last night. If there is one place that Mn needs to clean up, its the O line. Then they can start with cleaning up the D’s penalty issues that popped up. Walsh needs to get some counseling too.