It looks to me like they are trying to create an engine that combines the best attributes of an I/O with the best features of an outboard. The goal seems to be to get the quiet running of an I/O with no blocked access to the area behind the boat, so you can have swim platforms, etc with no outboards in the way, but then have the ease of access when the engine is out of the water.
Interesting, but I have to wonder if times haven’t moved on too far to go back toward the I/O days. The biggest thing the I/Os had going for them was that you could go way, way, way beyond what an outboard could produce as far as HP and torque. Well, now that outboards are going north of 400 HP and twins, triples, quads etc are designed into boats from the get-go, is there really a market to go back?
I got no clue about a bombardier outboard motor, but I sure like the snowmobiles and ATV’s.
The ironic thing–and it shows you the sticking power of a product’s reputation in the minds of many consumer–is that there are a lot of outboard guys who won’t touch a HPDI outboard like and Evinrude eTec because they heard they are unreliable.
To be certain there were some teething issues with both the HPDI Evinrude and the Merc has had its share of issues. Buy yet the snow machine guys seem to love the HPDI engines from BRP/Skidoo, Polaris, and I believe Cat has its own as well. Try to tell a moutain or high-performance snowmobiler that he should dump the “unreliable” HPDI 2 stroker and go 4 stroke.
So go figure.