Guys,
It’s been pretty quiet on the bass forum. I had this idea around for some time know so I put it together today. This is primarily pointed at the tournament guys but it’s true for all anglers. I encourage everyone to chime in.
Dock Talk 101
A substantial part of fishing our knowledge revolves around listening to, and deciphering information from other anglers. As a tournament angler I have learned the hard way that the information one gets isn’t always truthful. After having my confidence beat down, been deceived by, and outright lied to during the “dock talk”, I have developed a skeptical attitude. I try to block it out but that’s easier said than done. I’ve been fishing tournaments since the late 70’s and only in the last few years have I become confident enough to totally shut it out.
Here is the best advice I can pass on: The assumption is you’re preparing for a tournament. You have spent time practicing. You have spots, and have developed a couple of patterns that are working. You get together with the competition the night before the tournament and they start talking about all the big fish they are catching. The natural reaction is to question your game plan. Did you miss something? The answer is likely, yes. If you always got it right you would be winning all the tournaments you enter. So what do you do? Scuttle everything you have accomplished and start over? The answer is no, you stick with what you have learned and fish it to the patterns to the best of you ability. It’s a simple answer but what else can you do. You must execute based on what you know. To even talk about changing you game plan will undermine you confidence and distract from you concentration.
On the flip side, there are always a few pearls of information in some of the dock talk. Some guys are just to open for there own good. If I am part of the talk and think I may learn something, my approach is to compare what I’m hearing and what I’m finding on the water. Usually, you need a little more information. The skill is to ask the right questions. The question has to be formulated so that you’re not just reinforcing your belief (which may be wrong), but are parallel to what you are experiencing. The questions have to be generic enough to not have the guy clam up. They must not be too specific or treating. General questions like how deep, in current, in cover, schooled or spread out? If the answer’s line-up with what you are experiencing adds creditably to his comments. What you might learn is a detail that you missed or something you can use in the future.
Learning to tell the difference between BS and pearls and not letting the BS drive you off coarse may be the hardest part.