Muscatine Public Meeting – Commercial netting

  • NKT
    Louisa County, Iowa
    Posts: 111
    #1216874

    This meeting with the IDNR has been rescheduled and I will not be able to attend. I had made arrangements to make the original meeting date, but, with the new date I am hosed. I hope any sport fishers with an interest in market hunting on the Mississippi River will attend. Anyone that saw the number of nets spread below the New Boston dam last fall can understand the importance of this issue. Below is the note I received today from Mr. Schonhoff regarding the date change.
    ____________________________________________________________
    The meeting date had to be changed due to a problem getting it filed in Des Moines. The new date is July 16 starting at 7pm at the Musser Public Library 304 Iowa Ave. Muscatine. The meeting will start with the introduction of the proposed rule. Then anyone in attendance is welcome to comment on the rule. I would encourage you to have as many people there as you can so that their thoughts are brought out in the meeting. We do adjust the final rule if there is sufficient public comments one way or the other.

    Bernie

    Bernard Schonhoff
    Fishery Biologist
    Fairport Biology Station
    3390 Highway 22
    Muscatine, IA 52761

    Phone 563-263-5062
    email [email protected]

    brovarney
    Posts: 662
    #578523

    What is the importance of the issue? Will they accept letters and emails as public comment?

    NKT
    Louisa County, Iowa
    Posts: 111
    #578540

    Sturgeon netting has become very profitable. So, market hunters had nets strung across the New Boston pool completely covering the areas sport fishers have fished in the fall for generations. You’d have had to seen the amount of nets to have believed it. Two or three crews of out of state commercial netters practically blocked the river for sport fishing. Below is an explanation of the new rules from the IDNR.

    Bass fishing probably won’t be hurt as much as walleye and sauger – yet anyway.

    ____________________________________________________________
    Mr. Toland

    I did hear from one other angler who said you had emailed him. I also talked with a local commercial fisher that confirmed what you said about the high number of nets in the 17 tailwater. Internally there has been a lot of communication going back and forth between the biologist and the upper chain of command. So I want to assure you that this issue has not been dropped. We are attempting to get some addition information from Illinois about there commercial harvest and will be analyzing that when it is available hopefully by mid January.

    To answer your question if Ill and Iowa share regulations and license fees being the same. In general the two states try to keep the regulations the same both for commercial fishers and sport anglers. We have joint meeting between the two states and try to come to agreement
    on regulations that will be used. However, it is not always possible
    to do this. In the case of sturgeon commercial regulations what Iowa has in place.

    1. Harvest slot from 27 to 32 inches
    2. Harvest season from Oct. 15 to May 15

    was what was agreed to during our meeting with Ill. We were able to get these regulations in place. Illinois has not because of opposition by the commercial fishers association in Ill. Currently Ill does not have a season or harvest slot for sturgeon. The commercial fishers like the sport angler are required to follow the more restrictive regulation so both resident and non resident commercial anglers must follow Iowa’s rules when fishing in Iowa water.

    Ill is currently working on a package that has the following regulations.

    1. Harvest slot from 24 to 32 inches
    2. Harvest season from Oct. 1 to May 31
    3 roe harvester license and roe buyer license.

    As far as economics go they play very little part in regulator decisions. We first look at the need of the resource and then the impacts to the fishers. We try to take into account as may factors as possible but it can get troublesome when yo attempt to figure all of the economic, social, and even political consequences of a regulation. As far as the out of stater versus the resident I would say we lean toward the residents when it comes down to a call between them.

    I doubt that the resource could sustain 20 additional commercial anglers in Louisa and Muscatine counties

    Hopefully I addressed your concerns if not pleas contact me again.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.