Ok, I’ll add my 1/2 cent.
Since I learned to fish on reseovoirs, I would have agreed with Eric 100% whole heartedly. Spots on resovoirs are more like “locations”. Granted, there is the “spot on the spot”, i.e stump on the point, log on the channel swing, etc. Regardless, most of those are deep. Thus even if you give me the spot, I still have to catch the fish. The latter being MUCH more part of the game, even if you know the fish are there. If you show me where you caught fish like crazy with a jig, and I go there and throw a fluke, I might not catch anything.
When I first moved to MN, I pretty much thought the same thing as Eric. “Spots suck”. LOL Meaning they weren’t that big of a deal (see above). Since being here, I’ve learned that MN Lakes and the River are WAY different than a southern resevoir. Granted you still have to catch the fish, but there are certain spots that are just plain “money”. I believe that is because fish school more in the natural lakes and especially on the river.
Then there is the old saying, the only thing certain is change. This is definitely true on the river. A “spot” could be a great “spot” for many years, and then poof it’s gone.
The last thing I wanted to mention was about Eric’s (and someone else I believe) about feeling that you can never go back to someone’s spot although you probably would have learned it yourself eventually. I understand that completely. I don’t think you should quit fishing with folks because of that. I do, however, believe that is why a person usually has a few people he fished with a LOT. The 2 guys that I fish with on the river the most have showed me a TON. One pool I wonder if there is actually any shoreline left to fish that I haven’t been shown! BUT, I communicate very well with these guys and know I could fish stuff at anytime as long as I talk to them about it first. Even if I have been shown exactly where to go and what to do, I still have a lot to learn!
Chuck