Not a bad article, it all seemed true to me. There’s alot more to those shortcuts than the article really says though. Look at what it takes to understand the areas mentioned, especially understanding #1 for a variety of bodies of water . I mean look at some of the categories… vegetation, natural forage, cover, structure… vegetation and natural forage covers alot of ground… knowing the difference between curly pond weed, eel grass, deer tongue, northern milfoil, eurasian water milfoil, hydrilla etc… heck in some places you have to find out what the locals call things to understand what people are talking about… In alot of places people call ‘rushes’ “pencil reeds” or ‘cat tails’ “bullrushes” … so even if you actually know what they are there’s a communication problem unless you ask the guy to really describe the plant hehehe. Forage is even more difficult unless you generalize to minnows versus crawfish vs leeches vs bullheads vs bluegills vs shad and don’t get into the gazillion different types of forage that are available to the fish. There are some pretty significant differences in ecosystems as well plus, again, some of the local and some of the scientific definitions throw you hahaha… a gizzard shad is a herring… but a lake herring (cisco) is actually a salmonidae… a walleye is not a pike its a perch. Don’t see many cisco or tulibee in the lower Mississippi but you do in Northern Minnesota. Alot to learn on a single body of water let alone several bodies of water. Makes you sure respect the folks that can be consistent all over. I know it related the article as ‘short cuts’ but I think it left out ‘time on the water’ as probably the thing that seperates folks more than any other thing. Those that are more fanatic spend more time on the water and everything else seems to improve from there. The ability to recognize the general and subtle differences in all the categories he listed improves with time on the water. Makes me wonder sometimes how good several anglers I consider to be good would really be if they had 250+ days on the water… WOW… I think they’d stun folks cause of what they do as weekend anglers really.
I never have purchased an oxygen meter though I’ve thought about it. I’ve always depended on looking at the shape vegetation is in or the presence of current (wind or flowage) or springs. Probably something worth looking at.
Consistency is a difficult thing to achieve. I sure haven’t achieved it though its a goal. It goes in streaks for me … now there’s a conflict in terms… streaky consistency hahaha! But… thats how it seems to go… I’m hoping the streaks get closer together and last longer as time goes on hahaha.
Anyway, thanks for posting that. I enjoyed the read. Articles like that always cause me to look at what I’m doing.
Curt